Escalation on Kihon Checklist Scores Preceding the Certification of Long-Term Care Need in the Older Population in Japan. A 9-Year Retrospective Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-04-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23333928241247027
Kazuki Kitazawa, Kenji Tsuchiya, Kazuki Hirao, Tomomi Furukawa, Fusae Tozato, Tsutomu Iwaya, Shinichi Mitsui
{"title":"Escalation on Kihon Checklist Scores Preceding the Certification of Long-Term Care Need in the Older Population in Japan. A 9-Year Retrospective Study.","authors":"Kazuki Kitazawa, Kenji Tsuchiya, Kazuki Hirao, Tomomi Furukawa, Fusae Tozato, Tsutomu Iwaya, Shinichi Mitsui","doi":"10.1177/23333928241247027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is valuable for predicting long-term care (LTC) certification. However, the precise association between KCL scores and the temporal dynamics of LTC need certification remains unclear. This study clarified the characteristic trajectory of KCL scores in individuals certified for LTC need.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The KCL scores spanning from 2011 to 2019 were obtained from 5630 older individuals, including those certified for LTC need in November 2020, in Iiyama City, Nagano, Japan. We analyzed the KCL score trajectories using a linear mixed model, both before and after propensity score matching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout the 9-year observation period, the KCL scores consistently remained higher in the certified group compared to the non-certified group. Notably, a significant score increase occurred within the 3 years preceding LTC certification.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings highlight the effectiveness of continuous surveillance using the KCL in identifying individuals likely to require LTC within a few years.</p>","PeriodicalId":12951,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","volume":"11 ","pages":"23333928241247027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11044799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23333928241247027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The Kihon Checklist (KCL) is valuable for predicting long-term care (LTC) certification. However, the precise association between KCL scores and the temporal dynamics of LTC need certification remains unclear. This study clarified the characteristic trajectory of KCL scores in individuals certified for LTC need.

Methods: The KCL scores spanning from 2011 to 2019 were obtained from 5630 older individuals, including those certified for LTC need in November 2020, in Iiyama City, Nagano, Japan. We analyzed the KCL score trajectories using a linear mixed model, both before and after propensity score matching.

Results: Throughout the 9-year observation period, the KCL scores consistently remained higher in the certified group compared to the non-certified group. Notably, a significant score increase occurred within the 3 years preceding LTC certification.

Discussion: Our findings highlight the effectiveness of continuous surveillance using the KCL in identifying individuals likely to require LTC within a few years.

日本老年人口在获得长期护理需求认证前的 Kihon 检查表评分升级。一项为期 9 年的回顾性研究。
目的:Kihon 检查表(KCL)对预测长期护理(LTC)认证很有价值。然而,KCL 分数与 LTC 需求认证的时间动态之间的确切联系仍不清楚。本研究阐明了获得长期护理需求认证的个人的 KCL 分数的特征轨迹:我们从日本长野县饭山市的 5630 名老年人(包括 2020 年 11 月获得 LTC 需求认证的老年人)中获得了 2011 年至 2019 年的 KCL 分数。我们使用线性混合模型分析了倾向得分匹配前后的 KCL 分数轨迹:结果:在长达 9 年的观察期内,获得认证组的 KCL 分数始终高于未获得认证组。值得注意的是,在获得 LTC 认证前的 3 年内,得分出现了明显的增长:我们的研究结果凸显了使用 KCL 进行持续监测在识别几年内可能需要 LTC 的人群方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信