Determinants of Health Care Providers' Attitudes Toward Safe Abortion Care in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2024-04-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329241245218
Bikila Balis, Habtamu Bekele, Tegenu Balcha, Sisay Habte, Adera Debella, Ahmed Mohammed Husen, Ibsa Mussa, Fila Ahmed, Deribe Bekele, Abdi Amin, Addisu Alemu, Amalshet Getachew, Getachew Amare, Elias Yadeta, Abraham Negash, Magarsa Lami, Addis Eyeberu, Mohammed Abdurke Kure, Tamirat Getachew, Bajrond Eshetu
{"title":"Determinants of Health Care Providers' Attitudes Toward Safe Abortion Care in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Bikila Balis, Habtamu Bekele, Tegenu Balcha, Sisay Habte, Adera Debella, Ahmed Mohammed Husen, Ibsa Mussa, Fila Ahmed, Deribe Bekele, Abdi Amin, Addisu Alemu, Amalshet Getachew, Getachew Amare, Elias Yadeta, Abraham Negash, Magarsa Lami, Addis Eyeberu, Mohammed Abdurke Kure, Tamirat Getachew, Bajrond Eshetu","doi":"10.1177/11786329241245218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unsafe abortion is a serious reproductive health problem in developing countries including Ethiopia. The attitude of healthcare providers toward abortion is one of contributing factors to unsafe abortion. This study aimed to determine the pooled effect of healthcare workers' attitudes toward safe abortion care and its determinants factors in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Search engines such as Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and CAB Abstracts were used to find published studies where as Google and Google Scholar were used to find unpublished research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. The analysis was performed using STATA 14 and the random-effects model was used to calculate the odds ratios of medical professionals' attitudes regarding safe abortion services. Study heterogeneity was assessed by using <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> and <i>P</i>-values. To evaluate the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, respectively, sensitivity analysis and funnel plot were also performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 published and unpublished articles with a sample size of 4060 were incorporated in this Review. The overall pooled prevalence of this study was 56% (95% CI: 45-67). Sex of participants (AOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.57, 3.58), having training (AOR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.58, 5.17), Professional type (AOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.04, 4.46), and knowledge of abortion law (AOR:2.26; 95% CI: 1.14, 4.46) were the determinants factors that significantly associated with health care workers' attitude toward safe abortion care. Sensitivity analysis shows that the pooled odds ratios were consistently stable throughout all meta-analyses, and the funnel plot shows no evidence of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Half of health care providers sampled among the pooled studies have favorable attitudes toward abortion services in Ethiopia; which could hamper women's access to safe abortion care. Sex, training, type of profession, and knowing abortion law were determinants of health care workers' attitudes toward safe abortion services. Stakeholders should emphasize improving the attitude of healthcare workers toward safe abortion care which has a vital role in reducing maternal mortality. Moreover, working on modifiable factors like training, assigning personnel whose professions align with the service, and updating care providers about abortion law is also the essential key point to improve their intentions to deliver the services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10999111/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329241245218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unsafe abortion is a serious reproductive health problem in developing countries including Ethiopia. The attitude of healthcare providers toward abortion is one of contributing factors to unsafe abortion. This study aimed to determine the pooled effect of healthcare workers' attitudes toward safe abortion care and its determinants factors in Ethiopia.

Methods: Search engines such as Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and CAB Abstracts were used to find published studies where as Google and Google Scholar were used to find unpublished research. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. The analysis was performed using STATA 14 and the random-effects model was used to calculate the odds ratios of medical professionals' attitudes regarding safe abortion services. Study heterogeneity was assessed by using I2 and P-values. To evaluate the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, respectively, sensitivity analysis and funnel plot were also performed.

Results: A total of 15 published and unpublished articles with a sample size of 4060 were incorporated in this Review. The overall pooled prevalence of this study was 56% (95% CI: 45-67). Sex of participants (AOR: 2.37; 95% CI: 1.57, 3.58), having training (AOR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.58, 5.17), Professional type (AOR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.04, 4.46), and knowledge of abortion law (AOR:2.26; 95% CI: 1.14, 4.46) were the determinants factors that significantly associated with health care workers' attitude toward safe abortion care. Sensitivity analysis shows that the pooled odds ratios were consistently stable throughout all meta-analyses, and the funnel plot shows no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusion: Half of health care providers sampled among the pooled studies have favorable attitudes toward abortion services in Ethiopia; which could hamper women's access to safe abortion care. Sex, training, type of profession, and knowing abortion law were determinants of health care workers' attitudes toward safe abortion services. Stakeholders should emphasize improving the attitude of healthcare workers toward safe abortion care which has a vital role in reducing maternal mortality. Moreover, working on modifiable factors like training, assigning personnel whose professions align with the service, and updating care providers about abortion law is also the essential key point to improve their intentions to deliver the services.

埃塞俄比亚医疗服务提供者对安全堕胎护理态度的决定因素:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:在包括埃塞俄比亚在内的发展中国家,不安全堕胎是一个严重的生殖健康问题。医护人员对人工流产的态度是导致不安全人工流产的因素之一。本研究旨在确定埃塞俄比亚医护人员对安全人工流产护理的态度及其决定因素的综合影响:使用 Scopus、CINAHL、EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science 和 CAB Abstracts 等搜索引擎查找已发表的研究,并使用 Google 和 Google Scholar 查找未发表的研究。使用了《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)指南。使用 STATA 14 进行分析,并使用随机效应模型计算医务人员对安全堕胎服务态度的几率比。使用 I2 和 P 值评估研究的异质性。为了分别评估汇总值对异常值和发表偏倚的稳定性,还进行了敏感性分析和漏斗图:本综述共纳入了 15 篇已发表和未发表的文章,样本量为 4060 个。本研究汇总的总体患病率为 56%(95% CI:45-67)。参与者的性别(AOR:2.37;95% CI:1.57, 3.58)、是否接受过培训(AOR:2.86;95% CI:1.58, 5.17)、专业类型(AOR:1.55;95% CI:1.04, 4.46)和对堕胎法的了解(AOR:2.26;95% CI:1.14, 4.46)是与医护人员对安全堕胎护理的态度显著相关的决定因素。敏感性分析表明,在所有的荟萃分析中,汇总的几率比始终保持稳定,漏斗图显示没有证据表明存在出版偏倚:结论:在汇总研究中,有一半的医疗服务提供者对埃塞俄比亚的人工流产服务持赞成态度,这可能会阻碍妇女获得安全的人工流产护理。性别、培训、职业类型和对堕胎法的了解是医护人员对安全堕胎服务态度的决定因素。利益相关者应重视改善医护人员对安全堕胎护理的态度,这对降低孕产妇死亡率至关重要。此外,努力改变可改变的因素,如培训、指派专业与服务相符的人员、向医护人员提供有关堕胎法的最新信息等,也是改善医护人员提供服务意愿的关键点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信