Patient Experience and Decision-Making Process for Laser Photocoagulation for Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy: A Qualitative Exploration.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1159/000539054
Laura Colicchia, Saul Snowise, Whitney L Wunderlich, Jessica R Taghon, Anna K Schulte, Abbey C Sidebottom
{"title":"Patient Experience and Decision-Making Process for Laser Photocoagulation for Monochorionic Twin Pregnancy: A Qualitative Exploration.","authors":"Laura Colicchia, Saul Snowise, Whitney L Wunderlich, Jessica R Taghon, Anna K Schulte, Abbey C Sidebottom","doi":"10.1159/000539054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to explore patients' perspectives on diagnosis and treatment options for complicated monochorionic multiple gestations, and experiences with fetoscopic laser photocoagulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing laser photocoagulation. Participants were interviewed during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Qualitative analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Twenty-seven patients who were candidates for laser photocoagulation were included. All elected to have laser photocoagulation. Patients chose surgery with goals of improving survival, decreasing the risk of preterm delivery, and improving the long-term health of their fetuses. They demonstrated accurate knowledge of the risks and benefits of treatment. Most (74%) felt that laser photocoagulation represented their only viable clinical option. Few seriously considered pregnancy termination or selective reduction (7% and 11% respectively). Postpartum, patients expressed no regrets about their decisions for surgery, but many felt unprepared for the challenges of preterm delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants weighed treatment options similarly to fetal specialists. They acknowledged but did not seriously consider treatments other than fetoscopic laser photocoagulation and were highly motivated to do whatever they could to improve outcomes for their fetuses.</p>","PeriodicalId":12189,"journal":{"name":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"377-387"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to explore patients' perspectives on diagnosis and treatment options for complicated monochorionic multiple gestations, and experiences with fetoscopic laser photocoagulation.

Methods: This is a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing laser photocoagulation. Participants were interviewed during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Qualitative analysis was performed.

Result: Twenty-seven patients who were candidates for laser photocoagulation were included. All elected to have laser photocoagulation. Patients chose surgery with goals of improving survival, decreasing the risk of preterm delivery, and improving the long-term health of their fetuses. They demonstrated accurate knowledge of the risks and benefits of treatment. Most (74%) felt that laser photocoagulation represented their only viable clinical option. Few seriously considered pregnancy termination or selective reduction (7% and 11% respectively). Postpartum, patients expressed no regrets about their decisions for surgery, but many felt unprepared for the challenges of preterm delivery.

Conclusion: Participants weighed treatment options similarly to fetal specialists. They acknowledged but did not seriously consider treatments other than fetoscopic laser photocoagulation and were highly motivated to do whatever they could to improve outcomes for their fetuses.

单绒毛膜双胎妊娠激光光凝术的患者体验和决策过程:定性探索。
引言目的:探讨患者对复杂的单绒毛膜多胎妊娠的诊断和治疗方案的看法,以及使用胎儿镜激光光凝术的经验:这是一项针对接受激光光凝术患者的前瞻性队列研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是接受激光光凝治疗的患者,在孕期和产后接受了访谈。结果:研究共纳入了 27 名适合接受激光光凝术的患者。所有患者都选择了激光光凝术。患者选择手术的目的是提高存活率、降低早产风险和改善胎儿的长期健康状况。他们对治疗的风险和益处都有准确的认识。大多数患者(74%)认为激光光凝是他们唯一可行的临床选择。很少有人认真考虑过终止妊娠或选择性减胎(分别为 7% 和 11%)。产后,患者对自己的手术决定并不后悔,但许多人认为自己对早产的挑战毫无准备:结论:参与者与胎儿专家一样权衡治疗方案。他们承认但并未认真考虑胎儿镜激光光凝术以外的其他治疗方法,而且非常愿意尽其所能改善胎儿的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy
Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The first journal to focus on the fetus as a patient, ''Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy'' provides a wide range of biomedical specialists with a single source of reports encompassing the common discipline of fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信