Mihály Károlyi, Malgorzata Polacin, Márton Kolossváry, Justyna M Sokolska, Ioannis Matziris, Lucas Weber, Hatem Alkadhi, Robert Manka
{"title":"Comparative analysis of late gadolinium enhancement assessment techniques for monitoring fibrotic changes in myocarditis follow-up.","authors":"Mihály Károlyi, Malgorzata Polacin, Márton Kolossváry, Justyna M Sokolska, Ioannis Matziris, Lucas Weber, Hatem Alkadhi, Robert Manka","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10756-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the repeatability and interrelation of various late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessment techniques for monitoring fibrotic changes in myocarditis follow-up.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>LGE extent change between baseline and 3-month cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was compared in patients with acute myocarditis using the full width at half maximum (FWHM), gray-scale thresholds at 5 and 6 standard deviations (SD5 and SD6), visual assessment with threshold (VAT) and full manual (FM) techniques. In addition, visual presence score (VPS), visual transmurality score (VTS), and a simplified visual change score (VCS) were assessed. Intraclass-correlation (ICC) was used to evaluate repeatability, and methods were compared using Spearman's correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients (38 male, median age: 27 [IQR: 21; 38] years) were included. LGE extent change differed among quantitative techniques (p < 0.01), with variability in the proportion of patients showing LGE change during follow-up (FWHM: 62%, SD5: 74%, SD6: 66%, VAT: 43%, FM: 60%, VPS: 53%, VTS: 77%, VCS: 89%). Repeatability was highest with FWHM (ICC: 0.97) and lowest with SD5 (ICC: 0.89). Semiquantitative scoring had slightly lower values (VPS ICC: 0.81; VTS ICC: 0.71). VCS repeatability was excellent (ICC: 0.93). VPS and VTS correlated with quantitative techniques, while VCS was positively associated with VPS, VTS, VAT, and FM, but not with FWHM, SD5, and SD6.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FWHM offers the least observer-dependent LGE follow-up after myocarditis. VPS, VTS, and VCS are practical alternatives, showing reliable correlations with quantitative methods. Classification of patients exhibiting either stable or changing LGE relies on the assessment technique.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>This study shows that LGE monitoring in myocarditis is technique-dependent; the FWHM method yields the most consistent fibrotic tracking results, with scoring-based techniques as reliable alternatives.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Recognition of fibrotic changes during myocarditis follow-up is significantly influenced by the choice of the quantification technique employed. The FWHM technique ensures highly repeatable tracking of myocarditis-related LGE changes. Segment-based visual scoring and the simplified visual change score offer practical, reproducible alternatives in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10756-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the repeatability and interrelation of various late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) assessment techniques for monitoring fibrotic changes in myocarditis follow-up.
Materials and methods: LGE extent change between baseline and 3-month cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was compared in patients with acute myocarditis using the full width at half maximum (FWHM), gray-scale thresholds at 5 and 6 standard deviations (SD5 and SD6), visual assessment with threshold (VAT) and full manual (FM) techniques. In addition, visual presence score (VPS), visual transmurality score (VTS), and a simplified visual change score (VCS) were assessed. Intraclass-correlation (ICC) was used to evaluate repeatability, and methods were compared using Spearman's correlation.
Results: Forty-seven patients (38 male, median age: 27 [IQR: 21; 38] years) were included. LGE extent change differed among quantitative techniques (p < 0.01), with variability in the proportion of patients showing LGE change during follow-up (FWHM: 62%, SD5: 74%, SD6: 66%, VAT: 43%, FM: 60%, VPS: 53%, VTS: 77%, VCS: 89%). Repeatability was highest with FWHM (ICC: 0.97) and lowest with SD5 (ICC: 0.89). Semiquantitative scoring had slightly lower values (VPS ICC: 0.81; VTS ICC: 0.71). VCS repeatability was excellent (ICC: 0.93). VPS and VTS correlated with quantitative techniques, while VCS was positively associated with VPS, VTS, VAT, and FM, but not with FWHM, SD5, and SD6.
Conclusion: FWHM offers the least observer-dependent LGE follow-up after myocarditis. VPS, VTS, and VCS are practical alternatives, showing reliable correlations with quantitative methods. Classification of patients exhibiting either stable or changing LGE relies on the assessment technique.
Clinical relevance statement: This study shows that LGE monitoring in myocarditis is technique-dependent; the FWHM method yields the most consistent fibrotic tracking results, with scoring-based techniques as reliable alternatives.
Key points: Recognition of fibrotic changes during myocarditis follow-up is significantly influenced by the choice of the quantification technique employed. The FWHM technique ensures highly repeatable tracking of myocarditis-related LGE changes. Segment-based visual scoring and the simplified visual change score offer practical, reproducible alternatives in resource-limited settings.
期刊介绍:
European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field.
This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies.
From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.