The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults.

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY

CoDAS Pub Date : 2024-04-08 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt

Lidiéli Dalla Costa, Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher, Maristela Julio Costa

{"title":"The word-with-noise test: test-retest reliability in normal-hearing adults.","authors":"Lidiéli Dalla Costa, Ana Valéria de Almeida Vaucher, Maristela Julio Costa","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To investigate the reliability of the Word-with-Noise Test in a group of normal-hearing adults.Methods: Forty-five normal-hearing adult subjects participated in the research. The interval between the first and second assessment was 14 to 28 days, performed during the same time of the day and by the same evaluator. The comparison analysis between the test and the retest was performed considering the general result of the ears, totaling 90 ears evaluated. The inferential analysis included the comparison of the situations in the first and second assessment using the Wilcoxon Test, calculation, and interpretation of the Intraclass Correlation Index.Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the test and retest performances. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained were indicative of good reliability (r=0.759; p<0.001) for the monosyllabic stimulus and moderate reliability (r=0.631; p<0.001) for the disyllabic stimulus.Conclusion: The Word-with-Noise Test demonstrated satisfactory reliability for both the monosyllabic and disyllabic stimuli.","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20232023093pt","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the reliability of the Word-with-Noise Test in a group of normal-hearing adults.

Methods: Forty-five normal-hearing adult subjects participated in the research. The interval between the first and second assessment was 14 to 28 days, performed during the same time of the day and by the same evaluator. The comparison analysis between the test and the retest was performed considering the general result of the ears, totaling 90 ears evaluated. The inferential analysis included the comparison of the situations in the first and second assessment using the Wilcoxon Test, calculation, and interpretation of the Intraclass Correlation Index.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the test and retest performances. The intraclass correlation coefficients obtained were indicative of good reliability (r=0.759; p<0.001) for the monosyllabic stimulus and moderate reliability (r=0.631; p<0.001) for the disyllabic stimulus.

Conclusion: The Word-with-Noise Test demonstrated satisfactory reliability for both the monosyllabic and disyllabic stimuli.

查看原文本刊更多论文

带噪单词测试：正常听力成人的重复测试可靠性。

目的：在一组听力正常的成年人中调查噪声单词测试的可靠性：方法：45 名听力正常的成年人参加了研究。第一次和第二次评估之间的间隔时间为 14 至 28 天，在一天中的同一时间由同一评估者进行。测试和复测之间的比较分析是根据耳朵的总体结果进行的，共评估了 90 只耳朵。推理分析包括使用 Wilcoxon 检验比较第一次和第二次评估的情况，计算和解释类内相关指数：结果：在统计意义上，测试和复测成绩之间存在显著差异。获得的类内相关系数表明测试结果具有良好的可靠性（r=0.759；p）：单音节和双音节刺激下的单词噪音测试均表现出令人满意的可靠性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

12.50%

发文量

103

审稿时长

30 weeks