The Association between "Knee Movement" Method and Traditional Radiograph Positioning Procedure with the Incidence of True Lateral Knee Radiograph Achieved.

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Cpb John, S Wendell, L Kevin, T S Earlene, A R Dio
{"title":"The Association between \"Knee Movement\" Method and Traditional Radiograph Positioning Procedure with the Incidence of True Lateral Knee Radiograph Achieved.","authors":"Cpb John, S Wendell, L Kevin, T S Earlene, A R Dio","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2403.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to find the association between the Knee Movement or KM method versus the traditional lateral knee radiograph positioning procedure and the incidence of true lateral knee radiographs achieved.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study of patients with knee problems that underwent lateral knee radiograph using the knee movement method (KM method), starting from March 2022 until August 2022. Fifty knee radiograph results using the KM method (KM group) were compared to retrospective data from fifty knee radiograph from the patients before March 2022 using the traditional method of lateral knee radiograph as the control (TM group). The data were analysed using the Chi-Square test to see if the KM method is associated with more true lateral knee radiograph results achieved compared to the traditional procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty patients in the KM method group had 80% (n=40) true lateral knee radiographs and 20% (n=10) untrue lateral knee radiographs, while in the Traditional Procedure group from the retrospective data of 50 patients had 44% (n=22) true lateral knee radiographs and 56% (n=28) untrue lateral knee radiographs (P<0.05). There is no significant association between the type of procedure applied with the types of error (P=0.432). Nevertheless, it helps us as it gives a gross picture that most of the errors are under-rotation of the knee, either from the KM method Group 90% (n=9) or the Traditional procedure Group 79% (n=22).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The KM method was associated with achievement of a more true and accurate lateral knee radiograph. Additional studies with a larger sample should be done to evaluate the reliability of this method.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11023352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2403.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to find the association between the Knee Movement or KM method versus the traditional lateral knee radiograph positioning procedure and the incidence of true lateral knee radiographs achieved.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of patients with knee problems that underwent lateral knee radiograph using the knee movement method (KM method), starting from March 2022 until August 2022. Fifty knee radiograph results using the KM method (KM group) were compared to retrospective data from fifty knee radiograph from the patients before March 2022 using the traditional method of lateral knee radiograph as the control (TM group). The data were analysed using the Chi-Square test to see if the KM method is associated with more true lateral knee radiograph results achieved compared to the traditional procedure.

Results: Fifty patients in the KM method group had 80% (n=40) true lateral knee radiographs and 20% (n=10) untrue lateral knee radiographs, while in the Traditional Procedure group from the retrospective data of 50 patients had 44% (n=22) true lateral knee radiographs and 56% (n=28) untrue lateral knee radiographs (P<0.05). There is no significant association between the type of procedure applied with the types of error (P=0.432). Nevertheless, it helps us as it gives a gross picture that most of the errors are under-rotation of the knee, either from the KM method Group 90% (n=9) or the Traditional procedure Group 79% (n=22).

Conclusion: The KM method was associated with achievement of a more true and accurate lateral knee radiograph. Additional studies with a larger sample should be done to evaluate the reliability of this method.

膝关节运动 "法和传统 X 光片定位程序与获得真实膝关节外侧 X 光片的发生率之间的关系。
简介本研究旨在发现膝关节运动法或KM法与传统的膝关节外侧位片定位程序之间的关联,以及所获得的真实膝关节外侧位片的发生率:自2022年3月至2022年8月,对使用膝关节运动法(KM法)进行膝关节外侧位片检查的膝关节疾病患者进行横断面研究。将使用 KM 方法(KM 组)拍摄的 50 张膝关节 X 光片结果与 2022 年 3 月前使用传统膝关节外侧 X 光片方法拍摄的 50 张膝关节 X 光片的回顾性数据进行对比(TM 组)。数据采用Chi-Square检验法进行分析,以确定与传统方法相比,KM方法是否能获得更真实的膝关节侧位X光片结果:结果:KM 方法组的 50 名患者中,80%(n=40)获得了真实的膝关节外侧X光片,20%(n=10)获得了不真实的膝关节外侧X光片,而传统方法组的 50 名患者中,44%(n=22)获得了真实的膝关节外侧X光片,56%(n=28)获得了不真实的膝关节外侧X光片:KM方法可获得更真实、更准确的膝关节外侧X光片。应进行更多的样本研究,以评估该方法的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信