Inset techniques for the DIEP flap - what improves aesthetic outcomes?

Q4 Medicine
M Kadhum, C Symonette, M U Javed
{"title":"Inset techniques for the DIEP flap - what improves aesthetic outcomes?","authors":"M Kadhum, C Symonette, M U Javed","doi":"10.48095/ccachp202410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is widely considered as the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The inset technique of the DIEP flap is crucial in determining the overall aesthetic outcome; however, to date no systematic review is available that comprehensively assesses the various techniques. Evaluation of topic: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The methodology is outlined within our published protocol (Prospero CRD42023449477). Included articles met a minimal criterion compromising of the intervention (DIEP free flap for breast reconstruction) and outcomes (aesthetic and clinical outcomes). Six articles were included in this review, with a total of 346 patients and a follow-up ranging from 6 months to 4 years. Four articles were of a prospective case series study design, one article was a randomized controlled trial, and one article was a case-control study. The risk of bias was assessed to be high in the case series, but low and moderate in the randomized controlled trial and case-control study respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although limited by the quality of the evidence, the single aesthetic unit principle, dual-plane inset, elimination of the need for a skin paddle, appropriate flap positioning and rotation, and algorithmic in-setting may all improve the aesthetic outcome of DIEP free flaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":7098,"journal":{"name":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","volume":"66 1","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta chirurgiae plasticae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/ccachp202410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is widely considered as the gold standard in breast reconstruction. The inset technique of the DIEP flap is crucial in determining the overall aesthetic outcome; however, to date no systematic review is available that comprehensively assesses the various techniques. Evaluation of topic: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The methodology is outlined within our published protocol (Prospero CRD42023449477). Included articles met a minimal criterion compromising of the intervention (DIEP free flap for breast reconstruction) and outcomes (aesthetic and clinical outcomes). Six articles were included in this review, with a total of 346 patients and a follow-up ranging from 6 months to 4 years. Four articles were of a prospective case series study design, one article was a randomized controlled trial, and one article was a case-control study. The risk of bias was assessed to be high in the case series, but low and moderate in the randomized controlled trial and case-control study respectively.

Conclusion: Although limited by the quality of the evidence, the single aesthetic unit principle, dual-plane inset, elimination of the need for a skin paddle, appropriate flap positioning and rotation, and algorithmic in-setting may all improve the aesthetic outcome of DIEP free flaps.

DIEP 皮瓣的嵌入技术--如何提高美学效果?
导言:下腹穿孔器(DIEP)皮瓣被广泛认为是乳房重建的黄金标准。DIEP 皮瓣的嵌入技术是决定整体美学效果的关键;然而,迄今为止还没有系统性综述对各种技术进行全面评估。专题评估:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。我们公布的方案(Prospero CRD42023449477)中概述了该方法。纳入的文章符合干预(用于乳房重建的 DIEP 游离皮瓣)和结果(美学和临床结果)的最低标准。本综述共收录了六篇文章,共计 346 名患者,随访时间从 6 个月到 4 年不等。其中四篇为前瞻性病例系列研究,一篇为随机对照试验,一篇为病例对照研究。经评估,病例系列研究的偏倚风险较高,而随机对照试验和病例对照研究的偏倚风险分别较低和中等:尽管受证据质量的限制,但单一美学单位原则、双平面嵌入、无需皮瓣桨、适当的皮瓣定位和旋转以及算法内置设置都可以改善 DIEP 游离皮瓣的美学效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta chirurgiae plasticae
Acta chirurgiae plasticae Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信