Yingxin Chen, Zhida You, Cuiyu Wang, Ruiyao Gao, Kai Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of keratoplasty outcomes at the scar versus edema stages of keratoconus.","authors":"Yingxin Chen, Zhida You, Cuiyu Wang, Ruiyao Gao, Kai Zhang","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty or penetrating keratoplasty at the scar and the edema stages.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-five patients (45 eyes) with keratoconus scar stage (scar group, n=26; penetrating keratoplasty a subgroup, n=7; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty b subgroup, n=19) and keratoconus edema stage (edema group, n=19; penetrating keratoplasty c subgroup, n=12; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty d group, n=7) who received penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively studied. At 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, corneal endothelial cell density, and complications were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best-corrected visual acuity and average corneal endothelial cell loss rate were not significantly different between the scar and edema groups (p>0.05). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, the astigmatism and spherical equivalent in the scar group were significantly lower than those in the edema group (p<0.05). The spherical equivalent of the deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty b subgroup was lower than that of the penetrating keratoplasty a subgroup in the scar group 6 months after surgery (p<0.05). In the edema group, there was no significant difference in spherical equivalent between subgroups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism between subgroups within the two groups (p>0.05). In comparison to the scar group, the edema group experienced more complications. According to a survival analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the scar group and the edema group regarding the progression of vision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In terms of the outcomes and prognosis for vision after keratoplasty with edema stage and scar stage, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty may be as effective as penetrating keratoplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":"87 4","pages":"e2023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2023-0144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty or penetrating keratoplasty at the scar and the edema stages.
Methods: Forty-five patients (45 eyes) with keratoconus scar stage (scar group, n=26; penetrating keratoplasty a subgroup, n=7; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty b subgroup, n=19) and keratoconus edema stage (edema group, n=19; penetrating keratoplasty c subgroup, n=12; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty d group, n=7) who received penetrating keratoplasty or deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty from 2000 to 2022 were retrospectively studied. At 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery, the best-corrected visual acuity, astigmatism, spherical equivalent, corneal endothelial cell density, and complications were analyzed.
Results: The best-corrected visual acuity and average corneal endothelial cell loss rate were not significantly different between the scar and edema groups (p>0.05). At 6 and 12 months after surgery, the astigmatism and spherical equivalent in the scar group were significantly lower than those in the edema group (p<0.05). The spherical equivalent of the deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty b subgroup was lower than that of the penetrating keratoplasty a subgroup in the scar group 6 months after surgery (p<0.05). In the edema group, there was no significant difference in spherical equivalent between subgroups (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity and astigmatism between subgroups within the two groups (p>0.05). In comparison to the scar group, the edema group experienced more complications. According to a survival analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between the scar group and the edema group regarding the progression of vision.
Conclusions: In terms of the outcomes and prognosis for vision after keratoplasty with edema stage and scar stage, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty may be as effective as penetrating keratoplasty.
目的:评估深前板层角膜移植术或穿透性角膜移植术在瘢痕期和水肿期的疗效:方法:45 名患者(45 只眼)处于角膜瘢痕期(瘢痕组,n=26;穿透性角膜成形术 a 亚组,n=7;深前板层角膜成形术 b 亚组,n=19)和角膜水肿期(水肿组,n=19;穿透性角膜成形术 c 亚组,n=7;深前板层角膜成形术 b 亚组,n=19);对 2000 年至 2022 年期间接受穿透性角膜移植术或深前板层角膜移植术的患者(穿透性角膜移植术 c 亚组,n=12;深前板层角膜移植术 d 组,n=7)和角膜水肿阶段(水肿组,n=19;穿透性角膜移植术 c 亚组,n=12;深前板层角膜移植术 d 组,n=7)进行了回顾性研究。分析了术后1、6和12个月的最佳矫正视力、散光、球面等值、角膜内皮细胞密度和并发症:疤痕组和水肿组的最佳矫正视力和角膜内皮细胞平均损失率无明显差异(P>0.05)。术后 6 个月和 12 个月,瘢痕组的散光度数和球面等效度数明显低于水肿组(P0.05)。两组内亚组之间的最佳矫正视力和散光无明显差异(P>0.05)。与瘢痕组相比,水肿组出现的并发症更多。根据生存分析,疤痕组和水肿组在视力进展方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异:就水肿期和瘢痕期角膜移植术后视力的结果和预后而言,深前板层角膜移植术可能与穿透性角膜移植术一样有效。
期刊介绍:
The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.