The role of gel-infused translabial ultrasound as a new modality in evaluation of female urethral stricture.

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.168
Nastaran Mahmoudnejad, Alireza Abrishami, Farzaneh Sharifiaghdas, Ramin Borabadi, Mehdi Dadpour, Amirhossein Nayebzade, Mehdi Khazaei
{"title":"The role of gel-infused translabial ultrasound as a new modality in evaluation of female urethral stricture.","authors":"Nastaran Mahmoudnejad, Alireza Abrishami, Farzaneh Sharifiaghdas, Ramin Borabadi, Mehdi Dadpour, Amirhossein Nayebzade, Mehdi Khazaei","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To investigate the role of trans-labial ultrasound study in detection of female urethral stenosis (FUS) compared to former cysto-urethroscopy as the currently available definitive diagnostic modality.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 60 consecutive patients with bladder outlet obstruction diagnosed by clinical symptoms and urodynamic study, were included from 2019 to 2022. For additional assessment, all these patients underwent gel-Infused trans-labial ultrasound (GITLUS) and cystourethroscopy. Trans-labial real-time ultrasonography was performed following the insertion of 20 ml steady stream viscous jelly into the urethral meatus to assess the length of the urethra and exact location and length of the probable narrowing, as well as the presence of peri-urethral fibrosis (PUF).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In GITLUS evaluation, urethral stricture was found in 27 patients. Mean urethral length and stricture length were 35.63 ±4.78 and 17.04 ±10.59, respectively. All these stenosis were confirmed via cysto-urethroscopy. PUF was found in 20 of 27 patients. In cysto-urethroscopy, urethral stricture was confirmed in 40 patients: 13 in urethral meatus and 27 in other parts or pan-urethra. GITLUS could not reveal urethral stricture in 13 patients with meatal stenosis, confirmed with cystoscopy. GITLUS detected FUS less accurately when it involves pure distal urethra compared to other parts of urethra or pan-urethral stenosis (p value = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GITLUS is a safe, non-invasive, and valuable technique for detecting FUS. The location and the length of the stricture and probable peri-urethral fibrosis can be identified by this method. However, in meatal or pure short-length distal urethral strictures, this method should be used with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 1","pages":"152-156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11032035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: To investigate the role of trans-labial ultrasound study in detection of female urethral stenosis (FUS) compared to former cysto-urethroscopy as the currently available definitive diagnostic modality.

Material and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 60 consecutive patients with bladder outlet obstruction diagnosed by clinical symptoms and urodynamic study, were included from 2019 to 2022. For additional assessment, all these patients underwent gel-Infused trans-labial ultrasound (GITLUS) and cystourethroscopy. Trans-labial real-time ultrasonography was performed following the insertion of 20 ml steady stream viscous jelly into the urethral meatus to assess the length of the urethra and exact location and length of the probable narrowing, as well as the presence of peri-urethral fibrosis (PUF).

Results: In GITLUS evaluation, urethral stricture was found in 27 patients. Mean urethral length and stricture length were 35.63 ±4.78 and 17.04 ±10.59, respectively. All these stenosis were confirmed via cysto-urethroscopy. PUF was found in 20 of 27 patients. In cysto-urethroscopy, urethral stricture was confirmed in 40 patients: 13 in urethral meatus and 27 in other parts or pan-urethra. GITLUS could not reveal urethral stricture in 13 patients with meatal stenosis, confirmed with cystoscopy. GITLUS detected FUS less accurately when it involves pure distal urethra compared to other parts of urethra or pan-urethral stenosis (p value = 0.002).

Conclusions: GITLUS is a safe, non-invasive, and valuable technique for detecting FUS. The location and the length of the stricture and probable peri-urethral fibrosis can be identified by this method. However, in meatal or pure short-length distal urethral strictures, this method should be used with caution.

注入凝胶的经皮腔超声波作为一种新模式在评估女性尿道狭窄中的作用。
导言研究经腹腔超声检查在女性尿道狭窄(FUS)检测中的作用,与目前可用的明确诊断方式--前膀胱尿道镜检查相比:在这项横断面研究中,从2019年至2022年连续纳入了60名通过临床症状和尿动力学检查确诊的膀胱出口梗阻患者。为了进行额外评估,所有这些患者都接受了凝胶注入式经唇超声检查(GITLUS)和膀胱尿道镜检查。将20毫升稳定流动的粘稠果冻注入尿道肉腔后,进行经唇实时超声检查,以评估尿道长度、可能狭窄的确切位置和长度,以及是否存在尿道周围纤维化(PUF):结果:在 GITLUS 评估中,27 名患者发现了尿道狭窄。平均尿道长度和狭窄长度分别为(35.63 ± 4.78)和(17.04 ± 10.59)。所有这些狭窄均经膀胱尿道镜检查证实。27 名患者中有 20 人发现了 PUF。在膀胱尿道镜检查中,40 名患者被确诊为尿道狭窄:其中 13 例位于尿道肉腔,27 例位于其他部位或泛尿道。GITLUS 无法发现 13 名尿道肉腔狭窄患者的尿道狭窄,膀胱镜检查证实了这一点。与尿道其他部位或全尿道狭窄相比,当 FUS 涉及纯远端尿道时,GITLUS 检测 FUS 的准确性较低(P 值 = 0.002):GITLUS是一种安全、无创、有价值的FUS检测技术。结论:GITLUS 是一种安全、无创和有价值的 FUS 检测技术,可通过该方法确定狭窄的位置和长度以及可能的尿道周围纤维化。但是,对于肉腔或纯短尿道远端狭窄,应谨慎使用这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信