Fire risk assessment tools for the built environment - An explorative study through a developers’ survey

IF 3.4 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Louis Cleef, Ming Yang, Britte Bouchaut, Genserik Reniers
{"title":"Fire risk assessment tools for the built environment - An explorative study through a developers’ survey","authors":"Louis Cleef,&nbsp;Ming Yang,&nbsp;Britte Bouchaut,&nbsp;Genserik Reniers","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the built environment, often too much focus is put on compliance instead of seeking the optimal fire-safety solution for the building. Because of a lack of tangible incentives for building owners, the benefits of implementing fire safety measures and their societal contribution are often not recognized and therefore, not considered. By means of a literature review and a survey, we have indicated necessary fire-safety related attributes and tool features and analyzed the currently available fire risk assessment tools. This study shows that a limited number of these tools can provide a partial fire risk analysis of a building. A total of 26 tools were found. No tools were found that included all the identified fire consequence-related attributes to ensure fire-safe buildings. However, we did identify 11 tools that have the potential to assess between 32 % and 52 % of the found attributes of building fire safety. To stimulate the development of such tools, this paper provides 12 factors by which to assess fire risk assessment tools – quantifying the overall ‘quality’ of the assessment tool – which can incentivize industry to refine the existing ones with enhanced predictability of the potential consequences of fire incidents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 104169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224000821/pdfft?md5=5cabad96fe216a8b797c6899297c20e4&pid=1-s2.0-S0379711224000821-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711224000821","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the built environment, often too much focus is put on compliance instead of seeking the optimal fire-safety solution for the building. Because of a lack of tangible incentives for building owners, the benefits of implementing fire safety measures and their societal contribution are often not recognized and therefore, not considered. By means of a literature review and a survey, we have indicated necessary fire-safety related attributes and tool features and analyzed the currently available fire risk assessment tools. This study shows that a limited number of these tools can provide a partial fire risk analysis of a building. A total of 26 tools were found. No tools were found that included all the identified fire consequence-related attributes to ensure fire-safe buildings. However, we did identify 11 tools that have the potential to assess between 32 % and 52 % of the found attributes of building fire safety. To stimulate the development of such tools, this paper provides 12 factors by which to assess fire risk assessment tools – quantifying the overall ‘quality’ of the assessment tool – which can incentivize industry to refine the existing ones with enhanced predictability of the potential consequences of fire incidents.

建筑环境火灾风险评估工具--通过开发商调查进行的探索性研究
在建筑环境中,人们往往过于注重合规性,而不是寻求最佳的建筑消防安全解决方案。由于缺乏对建筑业主的实际激励措施,实施消防安全措施的好处及其对社会的贡献往往得不到认可,因此也就得不到考虑。通过文献综述和调查,我们指出了与消防安全相关的必要属性和工具特征,并分析了当前可用的火灾风险评估工具。这项研究表明,这些工具中数量有限的几种可以对建筑物进行部分火灾风险分析。总共发现了 26 种工具。没有发现任何工具包含所有已确定的火灾后果相关属性,以确保建筑物的消防安全。不过,我们确实发现了 11 种工具,它们有可能评估 32 % 到 52 % 的已发现建筑消防安全属性。为了促进此类工具的开发,本文提供了评估火灾风险评估工具的 12 个因素--量化评估工具的整体 "质量"--这可以激励行业改进现有工具,提高火灾事故潜在后果的可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信