Planfulness in Psychological Well-being: Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Presence of Meaning in Life

IF 2.8 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Theodoros Kyriazos, Mary Poga
{"title":"Planfulness in Psychological Well-being: Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Presence of Meaning in Life","authors":"Theodoros Kyriazos,&nbsp;Mary Poga","doi":"10.1007/s11482-024-10314-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the intricate dynamics between Planfulness in Personal Growth Initiative and Psychological well-being, emphasizing the mediating roles of General Self-Efficacy, the Presence of Meaning in Life, and the moderating impact of gender. A sample of 1,089 Greek adults was analyzed using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Personal Growth Initiative Scale, and Meaning in Life Questionnaire. The study employed a comprehensive analytical strategy, including correlation analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, path analysis, and covariance and variance analysis, to examine the interrelationships among the constructs. The results revealed significant positive correlations between Planfulness in Personal Growth Initiatives and Psychological Well-being. GSE and MLQ_P significantly mediated this relationship. Higher Planfulness was associated with increased self-efficacy and a stronger sense of life's meaning, contributing to enhanced psychological well-being. Gender differences were observed, with more pronounced effects in women than men. The study also identified a moderate covariance between GSE and MLQ_P, suggesting their interdependent influence on psychological well-being. The findings illuminate the critical roles of Planfulness, self-efficacy, and meaning in life in enhancing psychological well-being, with gender differences playing a significant role in these dynamics. These insights contribute to the theoretical understanding of psychological well-being and have practical implications in various sectors, including education, organizational management, mental health, and policy formulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51483,"journal":{"name":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","volume":"19 4","pages":"1927 - 1950"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Research in Quality of Life","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11482-024-10314-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the intricate dynamics between Planfulness in Personal Growth Initiative and Psychological well-being, emphasizing the mediating roles of General Self-Efficacy, the Presence of Meaning in Life, and the moderating impact of gender. A sample of 1,089 Greek adults was analyzed using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form, General Self-Efficacy Scale, Personal Growth Initiative Scale, and Meaning in Life Questionnaire. The study employed a comprehensive analytical strategy, including correlation analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, path analysis, and covariance and variance analysis, to examine the interrelationships among the constructs. The results revealed significant positive correlations between Planfulness in Personal Growth Initiatives and Psychological Well-being. GSE and MLQ_P significantly mediated this relationship. Higher Planfulness was associated with increased self-efficacy and a stronger sense of life's meaning, contributing to enhanced psychological well-being. Gender differences were observed, with more pronounced effects in women than men. The study also identified a moderate covariance between GSE and MLQ_P, suggesting their interdependent influence on psychological well-being. The findings illuminate the critical roles of Planfulness, self-efficacy, and meaning in life in enhancing psychological well-being, with gender differences playing a significant role in these dynamics. These insights contribute to the theoretical understanding of psychological well-being and have practical implications in various sectors, including education, organizational management, mental health, and policy formulation.

Abstract Image

心理健康中的计划性:自我效能感和生活意义的中介作用
本研究探讨了个人成长主动性中的计划性与心理健康之间错综复杂的动态关系,强调了一般自我效能感、生活意义的存在以及性别的调节作用。研究使用心理健康连续简表、一般自我效能感量表、个人成长主动性量表和生活意义问卷对 1089 名希腊成年人进行了抽样分析。研究采用了全面的分析策略,包括相关分析、确证因子分析、路径分析以及协方差和方差分析,以研究各构念之间的相互关系。结果显示,个人成长计划性与心理健康之间存在明显的正相关。GSE 和 MLQ_P 在很大程度上调节了这种关系。计划性越高,自我效能感越强,人生意义感越强,从而有助于提高心理健康水平。研究还发现了性别差异,女性的影响比男性更明显。研究还发现,GSE 和 MLQ_P 之间存在适度的协方差,这表明它们对心理健康有着相互依存的影响。研究结果阐明了 "计划性"、自我效能感和人生意义在提高心理幸福感方面的关键作用,而性别差异在这些动态变化中起着重要作用。这些见解有助于从理论上理解心理幸福感,并对教育、组织管理、心理健康和政策制定等各个领域具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Research in Quality of Life
Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信