Comparison of hematologic variables between dogs with congenital intrahepatic and extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

IF 2.1 2区 农林科学 Q1 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Yanick Couture, Deborah Keys, Stacie Summers
{"title":"Comparison of hematologic variables between dogs with congenital intrahepatic and extrahepatic portosystemic shunts","authors":"Yanick Couture,&nbsp;Deborah Keys,&nbsp;Stacie Summers","doi":"10.1111/jvim.17081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IHPSS) are predisposed to gastrointestinal inflammation, ulceration, and bleeding, unlike dogs with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS). Limited information is available about hematologic differences between dogs with IHPSS and dogs with EHPSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Compare hemogram variables between dogs with IHPSS and EHPSS. We hypothesized that hematologic variables would differ between the 2 populations, with a higher frequency and severity of anemia and microcytosis in dogs with IHPSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-six client-owned dogs with IHPSS and 35 client-owned dogs with EHPSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective cross-sectional study. Dogs were included if a CBC was performed before shunt attenuation. Contingency analysis was performed to determine if the frequency of clinical signs and of hematologic variables below the reference range differed between groups. Hematologic and selected biochemical variables were compared between groups using an analysis of covariance with age as a covariate.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Gastrointestinal clinical signs (IHPSS, 81% vs EHPSS, 34%; <i>P</i> = .01), anemia (31% vs 6%; <i>P</i> = .01), microcytosis (77% vs 29%; <i>P</i> = .002), and hypochromia (77% vs 49%; <i>P</i> = .03) were more common in dogs with IHPSS than in dogs with EHPSS. Dogs with IHPSS had lower packed cell volume (34% vs 41%, <i>P</i> = .04), hemoglobin concentration (11.5 g/dL vs 13.7 g/dL, <i>P</i> = .03), mean corpuscular volume (57 fL vs 65 fL; <i>P</i> = .001), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (32 g/dL vs 33 g/dL; <i>P</i> = .04) than dogs with EHPSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions and Clinical Importance</h3>\n \n <p>Dogs with IHPSS had a higher frequency of anemia, microcytosis, and hypochromia and exhibited more gastrointestinal clinical signs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49958,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"38 3","pages":"1458-1464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jvim.17081","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jvim.17081","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dogs with congenital intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IHPSS) are predisposed to gastrointestinal inflammation, ulceration, and bleeding, unlike dogs with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (EHPSS). Limited information is available about hematologic differences between dogs with IHPSS and dogs with EHPSS.

Objective

Compare hemogram variables between dogs with IHPSS and EHPSS. We hypothesized that hematologic variables would differ between the 2 populations, with a higher frequency and severity of anemia and microcytosis in dogs with IHPSS.

Animals

Twenty-six client-owned dogs with IHPSS and 35 client-owned dogs with EHPSS.

Methods

Retrospective cross-sectional study. Dogs were included if a CBC was performed before shunt attenuation. Contingency analysis was performed to determine if the frequency of clinical signs and of hematologic variables below the reference range differed between groups. Hematologic and selected biochemical variables were compared between groups using an analysis of covariance with age as a covariate.

Results

Gastrointestinal clinical signs (IHPSS, 81% vs EHPSS, 34%; P = .01), anemia (31% vs 6%; P = .01), microcytosis (77% vs 29%; P = .002), and hypochromia (77% vs 49%; P = .03) were more common in dogs with IHPSS than in dogs with EHPSS. Dogs with IHPSS had lower packed cell volume (34% vs 41%, P = .04), hemoglobin concentration (11.5 g/dL vs 13.7 g/dL, P = .03), mean corpuscular volume (57 fL vs 65 fL; P = .001), and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (32 g/dL vs 33 g/dL; P = .04) than dogs with EHPSS.

Conclusions and Clinical Importance

Dogs with IHPSS had a higher frequency of anemia, microcytosis, and hypochromia and exhibited more gastrointestinal clinical signs.

先天性肝内和肝外门静脉分流犬血液学变量的比较
背景患有先天性肝内门体分流术(IHPSS)的犬容易发生胃肠道炎症、溃疡和出血,这与患有先天性肝外门体分流术(EHPSS)的犬不同。有关 IHPSS 和 EHPSS 患犬之间血液学差异的信息十分有限。我们假设这两种人群的血液学变量会有所不同,其中 IHPSS 患犬贫血和小红细胞增多症的频率和严重程度更高。如果在分流衰减前进行了全血细胞计数,则纳入研究对象。通过权变分析确定不同组间临床症状和血液学变量低于参考范围的频率是否存在差异。结果 IHPSS 患犬的胃肠道临床症状(IHPSS,81% vs EHPSS,34%;P = .01)、贫血(31% vs 6%;P = .01)、小红细胞症(77% vs 29%;P = .002)和低色素血症(77% vs 49%;P = .03)比 EHPSS 患犬更常见。IHPSS 患犬的充盈细胞体积(34% vs 41%,P = .04)、血红蛋白浓度(11.5 g/dL vs 13.7 g/dL,P = .03)、平均血球容积(57 fL vs 65 fL;P = .001)和平均血球血红蛋白浓度(32 g/dL vs 33 g/dL;P = .结论和临床意义患有 IHPSS 的狗出现贫血、小红细胞症和低色素血症的频率更高,并表现出更多的胃肠道临床症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信