Application of RCS and signal-free RCS to tree-ring width and maximum latewood density data

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Inga K. Homfeld , Ulf Büntgen , Frederick Reinig , Max C.A. Torbenson , Jan Esper
{"title":"Application of RCS and signal-free RCS to tree-ring width and maximum latewood density data","authors":"Inga K. Homfeld ,&nbsp;Ulf Büntgen ,&nbsp;Frederick Reinig ,&nbsp;Max C.A. Torbenson ,&nbsp;Jan Esper","doi":"10.1016/j.dendro.2024.126205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Dendroclimatic research faces the challenge of selecting appropriate detrending methods for retaining low-frequency signals in temperature reconstructions. Among the numerous methods available to dendrochronologists, regional curve standardisation (RCS) and the signal-free approach in combination with RCS (SF-RCS) are increasingly used to preserve the full spectrum of temperature variance in tree-ring data. Here, we apply RCS and SF-RCS to tree-ring width (TRW) and maximum latewood density (MXD) datasets composed of only living and combined living and relict trees from northern Scandinavia. Whereas RCS and SF-RCS produce highly similar chronologies when applied to composite (living-plus-relict) datasets, particularly for MXD, both methods fail to establish chronologies coherent with regional temperature trends when applied to living-tree datasets. Additional tests including pruning of well-replicated living-tree datasets, to approximate the heterogenous age-structure of composite datasets, reveal improved results and coherent trends in MXD. While this demonstrates the applicability of joint detrending and pruning techniques to retain meaningful low-frequency variance in living-tree MXD chronologies, similar improvements were not achieved with TRW, likely because of the much stronger age-trend inherent to this widely used proxy. Further tests with other tree species and in alpine environments are needed to verify these findings. However, such assessments require an adjustment of tree-ring sampling protocols to increase replication to 50+ trees per site including old and young individuals to facilitate data pruning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50595,"journal":{"name":"Dendrochronologia","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 126205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000420/pdfft?md5=746c174ce289117c78a31af62d43cea8&pid=1-s2.0-S1125786524000420-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dendrochronologia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1125786524000420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dendroclimatic research faces the challenge of selecting appropriate detrending methods for retaining low-frequency signals in temperature reconstructions. Among the numerous methods available to dendrochronologists, regional curve standardisation (RCS) and the signal-free approach in combination with RCS (SF-RCS) are increasingly used to preserve the full spectrum of temperature variance in tree-ring data. Here, we apply RCS and SF-RCS to tree-ring width (TRW) and maximum latewood density (MXD) datasets composed of only living and combined living and relict trees from northern Scandinavia. Whereas RCS and SF-RCS produce highly similar chronologies when applied to composite (living-plus-relict) datasets, particularly for MXD, both methods fail to establish chronologies coherent with regional temperature trends when applied to living-tree datasets. Additional tests including pruning of well-replicated living-tree datasets, to approximate the heterogenous age-structure of composite datasets, reveal improved results and coherent trends in MXD. While this demonstrates the applicability of joint detrending and pruning techniques to retain meaningful low-frequency variance in living-tree MXD chronologies, similar improvements were not achieved with TRW, likely because of the much stronger age-trend inherent to this widely used proxy. Further tests with other tree species and in alpine environments are needed to verify these findings. However, such assessments require an adjustment of tree-ring sampling protocols to increase replication to 50+ trees per site including old and young individuals to facilitate data pruning.

将 RCS 和无信号 RCS 应用于树轮宽度和最大晚材密度数据
树木气候研究面临的挑战是选择适当的去趋势方法,以保留温度重建中的低频信号。在众多可供树龄学家使用的方法中,区域曲线标准化(RCS)和结合 RCS 的无信号方法(SF-RCS)越来越多地被用来保留树环数据中温度变异的全部频谱。在此,我们将 RCS 和 SF-RCS 应用于斯堪的纳维亚半岛北部的树环宽度(TRW)和最大晚材密度(MXD)数据集,这些数据集仅由活树和活树与孑遗树组合而成。当将 RCS 和 SF-RCS 应用于复合(活体加孑遗)数据集时,尤其是 MXD 数据集时,它们产生的年代学非常相似,但当将这两种方法应用于活体树数据集时,它们都无法建立与区域温度趋势一致的年代学。其他测试包括对复制良好的活树数据集进行修剪,以近似复合数据集的异质年龄结构,结果显示 MXD 的结果有所改善,趋势也更加一致。这表明联合去趋势和修剪技术可用于保留活树 MXD 年代学中有意义的低频变异,但 TRW 却没有实现类似的改进,可能是因为这种广泛使用的代用指标固有的年龄趋势要强得多。要验证这些发现,还需要对其他树种和高山环境进行进一步测试。不过,此类评估需要调整树环采样方案,将每个地点的重复数量增加到 50 棵以上,包括老树和幼树,以方便数据修剪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dendrochronologia
Dendrochronologia FORESTRY-GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
82
审稿时长
22.8 weeks
期刊介绍: Dendrochronologia is a peer-reviewed international scholarly journal that presents high-quality research related to growth rings of woody plants, i.e., trees and shrubs, and the application of tree-ring studies. The areas covered by the journal include, but are not limited to: Archaeology Botany Climatology Ecology Forestry Geology Hydrology Original research articles, reviews, communications, technical notes and personal notes are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信