Decisional regret and impacts on quality of life following genitourinary reconstruction for neurogenic bladder: A comparison between acquired and congenital spinal cord injury
João Pedro Emrich Accioly, James Bena, Huijun Xiao, Stacy Jeong, Roger K. Khouri, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Molly Dewitt‐Foy, Gregory Nemunaitis, Hadley M. Wood
{"title":"Decisional regret and impacts on quality of life following genitourinary reconstruction for neurogenic bladder: A comparison between acquired and congenital spinal cord injury","authors":"João Pedro Emrich Accioly, James Bena, Huijun Xiao, Stacy Jeong, Roger K. Khouri, Kenneth W. Angermeier, Molly Dewitt‐Foy, Gregory Nemunaitis, Hadley M. Wood","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionPatient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary‐related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A‐SCI) and congenital (C‐SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A‐SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C‐SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.DesignIn this cross‐sectional survey study, we compared A‐SCI to C‐SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self‐reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient‐reported outcome measures.SettingParticipants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.ParticipantsThe A‐SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C‐SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Decisional Regret Scale, Short form‐ Qualiveen (SF‐Qualiveen), and Patient‐reported outcomes measurement Information system‐10 (PROMIS‐10) Global Health surveys.ResultsThe A‐SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C‐SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow‐up time. SF‐Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A‐SCI than for C‐SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with A‐SCI demonstrate lower self‐reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C‐SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self‐reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C‐SCI.","PeriodicalId":20287,"journal":{"name":"Pm & R","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pm & R","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
IntroductionPatient expectations and baseline health are important drivers of outcomes following major genitourinary reconstructive surgery for neurogenic bladder (NGB). Differences in expectations and quality of life (QoL) improvements among different populations with NGB remain insufficiently explored in the literature.ObjectiveTo compare decisional regret (DR) and urinary‐related QoL (UrQoL) in patients undergoing urinary diversion for NGB arising from spinal cord injury of acquired (A‐SCI) and congenital (C‐SCI) etiologies. We hypothesize that patients with A‐SCI have higher expectations of improvement in QoL following surgery when compared with C‐SCI, which may lead to higher DR and decreased UrQoL, postoperatively.DesignIn this cross‐sectional survey study, we compared A‐SCI to C‐SCI in terms of DR, UrQoL, and postoperative changes in self‐reported physical health, mental health, and pain using validated patient‐reported outcome measures.SettingParticipants were enrolled from a quaternary care institution via mail and MyChart.ParticipantsThe A‐SCI group consistied of 17 patients with traumatic spinal cord injury the C‐SCI group was composed of 20 patients with spina bifida.InterventionsNot applicable.Main Outcome MeasuresThe Decisional Regret Scale, Short form‐ Qualiveen (SF‐Qualiveen), and Patient‐reported outcomes measurement Information system‐10 (PROMIS‐10) Global Health surveys.ResultsThe A‐SCI group displayed poorer preoperative physical health than the C‐SCI cohort, but absolute postoperative changes in this score, along with mental health score and pain level, were not significant after adjusting for baseline scores and follow‐up time. SF‐Qualiveen scores revealed significantly worse impact of NGB in UrQoL for A‐SCI than for C‐SCI when adjusted for other factors. No differences in DR were seen between the groups.ConclusionsPatients with A‐SCI demonstrate lower self‐reported baseline physical health compared with patients with C‐SCI, which may have implications in setting patient expectations when undergoing urinary diversion. In this small cohort, we found a milder self‐reported postoperative impact of NGB in UrQoL in patients with C‐SCI.