Changes in Job Strain in the US, Europe and Korea

IF 2.8 3区社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY

Applied Research in Quality of Life Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1007/s11482-024-10312-1

Fabrice Murtin, Benoît Arnaud, Duncan Gallie, Christine Le Thi, Agnès Parent-Thirion

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes the quality of the working environment in the US, Europe and Korea in 2010 and 2015. Based on the job demands-resources model (Journal of Applied Psychology 86:499–512, 2001), we define job strain as a situation where job demands exceed job resources. We find that perceived intimidation and discrimination at work is one of the most powerful predictors of mental and physical health, job satisfaction and job motivation. In 2015, about one third of employees were strained at work across countries. Over the 2010–15 period, job strain has slightly declined, falling in a majority of countries.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

美国、欧洲和韩国工作压力的变化

本文介绍了 2010 年和 2015 年美国、欧洲和韩国的工作环境质量。根据工作需求-资源模型（《应用心理学杂志》86:499-512，2001 年），我们将工作压力定义为工作需求超过工作资源的情况。我们发现，感知到的工作恐吓和歧视是身心健康、工作满意度和工作动力的最有力预测因素之一。2015 年，各国约有三分之一的员工工作紧张。在 2010-15 年期间，大多数国家的工作压力略有下降。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Applied Research in Quality of Life SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

11.80%

发文量

期刊介绍： The aim of this journal is to publish conceptual, methodological and empirical papers dealing with quality-of-life studies in the applied areas of the natural and social sciences. As the official journal of the ISQOLS, it is designed to attract papers that have direct implications for, or impact on practical applications of research on the quality-of-life. We welcome papers crafted from interdisciplinary, inter-professional and international perspectives. This research should guide decision making in a variety of professions, industries, nonprofit, and government sectors, including healthcare, travel and tourism, marketing, corporate management, community planning, social work, public administration, and human resource management. The goal is to help decision makers apply performance measures and outcome assessment techniques based on concepts such as well-being, human satisfaction, human development, happiness, wellness and quality-of-life. The Editorial Review Board is divided into specific sections indicating the broad scope of practice covered by the journal. The section editors are distinguished scholars from many countries across the globe.