The impact of age on physical functioning after treatment for breast cancer, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
V.R. Robins , S. Gelcich , K. Absolom , G. Velikova
{"title":"The impact of age on physical functioning after treatment for breast cancer, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures: A systematic review","authors":"V.R. Robins ,&nbsp;S. Gelcich ,&nbsp;K. Absolom ,&nbsp;G. Velikova","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>This systematic review aims to explore the impact of age on physical functioning post-treatment for early-stage, locally advanced, or locally recurrent breast cancer, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), identify PROMs used and variations in physical functioning terms/labels.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>MEDLINE, EmBase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED were searched, along with relevant key journals and reference lists. Risk of bias (quality) assessment was conducted using a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data was synthesised through tables and narrative.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>28,207 titles were extracted from electronic databases, resulting in 44 studies with age sub-groups, and 120 without age sub-groups. Of those with findings on the impact of age, there was variability in the way findings were reported and 21 % found that age did not have a significant impact. However, 66 % of the studies found that with older age, physical functioning declined post-treatment. Comorbidities were associated with physical functioning declines. However, findings from sub-groups (breast cancer stage, treatment type and time post-treatment) lacked concordance. Twenty-eight types of PROM were used: the EORTC QLQ-C30 was most common (50.6 %), followed by the SF-36 (32.3 %). There were 145 terms/labels for physical functioning: ‘physical functioning/function’ was used most often (82.3 %).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Findings point towards an older age and comorbidities being associated with more physical functioning declines. However, it was not possible to determine if stage, treatment type and time since treatment had any influence. More consistent use of the terminology ‘physical functioning/function’ would aid future comparisons of study results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 103734"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000651/pdfft?md5=2a7044fadc04ee74136fc190a5f2d1a7&pid=1-s2.0-S0960977624000651-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960977624000651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review aims to explore the impact of age on physical functioning post-treatment for early-stage, locally advanced, or locally recurrent breast cancer, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), identify PROMs used and variations in physical functioning terms/labels.

Methods

MEDLINE, EmBase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED were searched, along with relevant key journals and reference lists. Risk of bias (quality) assessment was conducted using a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data was synthesised through tables and narrative.

Results

28,207 titles were extracted from electronic databases, resulting in 44 studies with age sub-groups, and 120 without age sub-groups. Of those with findings on the impact of age, there was variability in the way findings were reported and 21 % found that age did not have a significant impact. However, 66 % of the studies found that with older age, physical functioning declined post-treatment. Comorbidities were associated with physical functioning declines. However, findings from sub-groups (breast cancer stage, treatment type and time post-treatment) lacked concordance. Twenty-eight types of PROM were used: the EORTC QLQ-C30 was most common (50.6 %), followed by the SF-36 (32.3 %). There were 145 terms/labels for physical functioning: ‘physical functioning/function’ was used most often (82.3 %).

Conclusions

Findings point towards an older age and comorbidities being associated with more physical functioning declines. However, it was not possible to determine if stage, treatment type and time since treatment had any influence. More consistent use of the terminology ‘physical functioning/function’ would aid future comparisons of study results.

根据患者报告的结果测量,年龄对乳腺癌治疗后身体功能的影响:系统综述。
目的 本系统性综述旨在通过患者报告的结果测量指标(PROMs),探讨年龄对早期、局部晚期或局部复发性乳腺癌治疗后身体功能的影响,确定所使用的PROMs以及身体功能术语/标签的差异。使用 "批判性评估技能计划 "核对表对偏倚风险(质量)进行评估。结果从电子数据库中提取了 28,207 个标题,其中 44 项研究涉及年龄分组,120 项研究不涉及年龄分组。在对年龄的影响有研究结果的研究中,报告结果的方式存在差异,21% 的研究发现年龄没有显著影响。然而,66%的研究发现,随着年龄的增长,治疗后的身体机能会下降。合并症与身体机能下降有关。然而,分组(乳腺癌分期、治疗类型和治疗后时间)的研究结果缺乏一致性。共使用了 28 种 PROM:最常用的是 EORTC QLQ-C30(50.6%),其次是 SF-36(32.3%)。有 145 个关于身体功能的术语/标签:"身体功能/功能 "最常用(82.3%)。但是,无法确定阶段、治疗类型和治疗后的时间是否有影响。如果能更加统一地使用 "身体功能/功能 "这一术语,将有助于今后对研究结果进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Breast
Breast 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Breast is an international, multidisciplinary journal for researchers and clinicians, which focuses on translational and clinical research for the advancement of breast cancer prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信