Pearce B. Haldeman , Samuel R. Ward , Joseph Osorio , Bahar Shahidi
{"title":"An evidence based conceptual framework for the multifactorial understanding of proximal junctional kyphosis","authors":"Pearce B. Haldeman , Samuel R. Ward , Joseph Osorio , Bahar Shahidi","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a debilitating pathology that arises from a variety of etiologies. Spinal fusion surgery is the mainstay of treatment for those who do not achieve symptom relief with conservative interventions. Fusion surgery can be complicated by a secondary deformity termed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>This scoping review evaluates the modern body of literature analyzing risk factors for PJK development and organizes these factors according to a multifactorial framework based on mechanical, tissue or demographic components.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>An extensive search of the literature was performed in PubMed and Embase back to the year 2010. Articles were assessed for quality. All risk factors that were evaluated and those that significantly predicted the development of PJK were compiled. The frequency that a risk factor was predictive compared to the number of times it was evaluated was calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>150 articles were reviewed. 57.3% of papers were of low quality. 76% of risk factors analyzed were focusing on the mechanical contribution to development of PJK versus only 5% were focusing on the tissue-based contribution. Risk factors that were most frequently predictive compared to how often they were analyzed were Hounsfield Units of vertebrae, UIV disc degeneration, paraspinal muscle cross sectional area and fatty infiltration, ligament augmentation, instrument characteristics, postoperative hip and lower extremity radiographic metrics, and postoperative teriparatide supplementation.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>This review finds a multifactorial framework accounting for mechanical, patient and tissue-based risk factors will improve the understanding of PJK development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 102807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000638/pdfft?md5=31ff91ebec3667a62a4758bd8a79fbb8&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000638-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a debilitating pathology that arises from a variety of etiologies. Spinal fusion surgery is the mainstay of treatment for those who do not achieve symptom relief with conservative interventions. Fusion surgery can be complicated by a secondary deformity termed proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK).
Research question
This scoping review evaluates the modern body of literature analyzing risk factors for PJK development and organizes these factors according to a multifactorial framework based on mechanical, tissue or demographic components.
Materials and methods
An extensive search of the literature was performed in PubMed and Embase back to the year 2010. Articles were assessed for quality. All risk factors that were evaluated and those that significantly predicted the development of PJK were compiled. The frequency that a risk factor was predictive compared to the number of times it was evaluated was calculated.
Results
150 articles were reviewed. 57.3% of papers were of low quality. 76% of risk factors analyzed were focusing on the mechanical contribution to development of PJK versus only 5% were focusing on the tissue-based contribution. Risk factors that were most frequently predictive compared to how often they were analyzed were Hounsfield Units of vertebrae, UIV disc degeneration, paraspinal muscle cross sectional area and fatty infiltration, ligament augmentation, instrument characteristics, postoperative hip and lower extremity radiographic metrics, and postoperative teriparatide supplementation.
Discussion and conclusion
This review finds a multifactorial framework accounting for mechanical, patient and tissue-based risk factors will improve the understanding of PJK development.