Factors Influencing Acceptance and Use of Online Counseling Technology among Thai Psychologists and Mental Health Counsellors

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Pal Srijundaree, Phamornpun Yurayat, Pairat Nipanan
{"title":"Factors Influencing Acceptance and Use of Online Counseling Technology among Thai Psychologists and Mental Health Counsellors","authors":"Pal Srijundaree, Phamornpun Yurayat, Pairat Nipanan","doi":"10.25217/0020247451200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid growth of online counseling (OC) services for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic prompted concerns regarding its effectiveness compared to in-person counseling. Psychologists have expressed uncertainties about OC's efficacy and doubts about their competence in using it. As a result, psychologists have been hesitant to embrace OC methods and supporting technologies. Therefore, it has become crucial to study the factors that influence the acceptance and use of OC technology, enabling psychologists to develop the necessary skills and confidence to utilize inpatient treatment effectively. This study used quantitative research with survey research to study factors influencing 406 Thai counselors' use and acceptance of technology in online counseling, and the model was analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results showed that IOC are positively influenced by SI (β= .413, p<.001, t = 9.95) ATOC (β= .398, p<.001, t = 7.09), and PE (β= .114, p<.05, t = 2.01). While IOC is negatively influenced by FC (β= -.117, p<.05, t = -2.08). Furthermore, UOC was positively influenced by IOC (β= .511, p<.001, t = 9.64). On the contrary ATOC negatively affected UOC (β= -.215, p<.001, t = -3.77), indicating that it exerts a partial mediation effect on the relationship between PE, SI, FC, ATOC and UOC. The study represents a pioneering study on UTAUT use in determining technologies' influence on online mental health counseling in Southeast Asia. The findings could offer valuable perspectives on how to increase the uptake of online counseling among psychologists by elevating the perceived advantages of the service, assisting in the creation of more efficient, organizations or authorities that foster positive attitudes toward the use of online counseling among psychologists, and fostering increased acceptance and usage of online counseling going forward.","PeriodicalId":32996,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal","volume":"83 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25217/0020247451200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid growth of online counseling (OC) services for mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic prompted concerns regarding its effectiveness compared to in-person counseling. Psychologists have expressed uncertainties about OC's efficacy and doubts about their competence in using it. As a result, psychologists have been hesitant to embrace OC methods and supporting technologies. Therefore, it has become crucial to study the factors that influence the acceptance and use of OC technology, enabling psychologists to develop the necessary skills and confidence to utilize inpatient treatment effectively. This study used quantitative research with survey research to study factors influencing 406 Thai counselors' use and acceptance of technology in online counseling, and the model was analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results showed that IOC are positively influenced by SI (β= .413, p<.001, t = 9.95) ATOC (β= .398, p<.001, t = 7.09), and PE (β= .114, p<.05, t = 2.01). While IOC is negatively influenced by FC (β= -.117, p<.05, t = -2.08). Furthermore, UOC was positively influenced by IOC (β= .511, p<.001, t = 9.64). On the contrary ATOC negatively affected UOC (β= -.215, p<.001, t = -3.77), indicating that it exerts a partial mediation effect on the relationship between PE, SI, FC, ATOC and UOC. The study represents a pioneering study on UTAUT use in determining technologies' influence on online mental health counseling in Southeast Asia. The findings could offer valuable perspectives on how to increase the uptake of online counseling among psychologists by elevating the perceived advantages of the service, assisting in the creation of more efficient, organizations or authorities that foster positive attitudes toward the use of online counseling among psychologists, and fostering increased acceptance and usage of online counseling going forward.
影响泰国心理学家和心理健康顾问接受和使用在线咨询技术的因素
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,心理健康在线咨询(OC)服务迅速发展,这引发了人们对其与面对面咨询相比是否有效的担忧。心理学家对 OC 的有效性表示不确定,并对他们使用 OC 的能力表示怀疑。因此,心理学家在接受 OC 方法和支持技术方面一直犹豫不决。因此,研究影响接受和使用 OC 技术的因素,使心理学家能够发展必要的技能和信心,从而有效地利用住院治疗,已变得至关重要。本研究采用定量研究与调查研究相结合的方法,研究了影响 406 名泰国心理咨询师使用和接受在线心理咨询技术的因素,并采用结构方程模型对模型进行了分析。结果显示,IOC 受 SI(β= .413,p<.001,t = 9.95)、ATOC(β= .398,p<.001,t = 7.09)和 PE(β= .114,p<.05,t = 2.01)的正向影响。而 IOC 受 FC 的负面影响(β= -.117,p<.05,t = -2.08)。此外,UOC 受 IOC 的正向影响(β= .511,p<.001,t = 9.64)。相反,ATOC 对 UOC 有负面影响(β= -.215,p<.001,t = -3.77),这表明它对 PE、SI、FC、ATOC 和 UOC 之间的关系起到了部分中介作用。本研究是东南亚地区使用UTAUT确定技术对在线心理健康咨询影响的一项开创性研究。研究结果可为以下方面提供有价值的视角:如何提高心理学家对在线心理咨询服务优势的认知度,协助建立更高效的组织或机构,促进心理学家对使用在线心理咨询服务持积极态度,并在未来促进在线心理咨询服务的接受度和使用率的提高,从而提高心理学家对在线心理咨询服务的接受度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal
Islamic Guidance and Counseling Journal Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信