Testing for Measurement Invariance of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms–34 Scores With a University Sample

Heather L. Smith, Martin F. Sherman, Julie Sriken, Bradley T. Erford, Adriana Kipper-Smith, Frances Niarhos
{"title":"Testing for Measurement Invariance of the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms–34 Scores With a University Sample","authors":"Heather L. Smith, Martin F. Sherman, Julie Sriken, Bradley T. Erford, Adriana Kipper-Smith, Frances Niarhos","doi":"10.17744/mehc.46.2.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study expanded previous psychometric analyses to include gender and race using measurement invariance with the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS-34) on a large sample (n = 4,013) of students referred to a university counseling center. Internal consistency was demonstrated for all subscales with all αs and ωs ≥ .80. The seven-factor model provided a good to excellent fit for all participant subgroup responses. The total sample comparative fit index was .948, the root-mean-square error of approximation was .058 [.057, .059], and the standardized root-mean-square residual was .048. Full measurement invariance was documented across all gender and racial/ethnic identity comparisons (i.e., White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, multiracial, Latino/a/x, non-Latino/a/x). The study concluded that CCAPS-34 subscales scores can be used with confidence with college-aged students of diverse backgrounds for screening and outcome assessment purposes.","PeriodicalId":90224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mental health counseling","volume":"358 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mental health counseling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.46.2.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study expanded previous psychometric analyses to include gender and race using measurement invariance with the Counseling Center Assessment of Psychological Symptoms (CCAPS-34) on a large sample (n = 4,013) of students referred to a university counseling center. Internal consistency was demonstrated for all subscales with all αs and ωs ≥ .80. The seven-factor model provided a good to excellent fit for all participant subgroup responses. The total sample comparative fit index was .948, the root-mean-square error of approximation was .058 [.057, .059], and the standardized root-mean-square residual was .048. Full measurement invariance was documented across all gender and racial/ethnic identity comparisons (i.e., White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander, multiracial, Latino/a/x, non-Latino/a/x). The study concluded that CCAPS-34 subscales scores can be used with confidence with college-aged students of diverse backgrounds for screening and outcome assessment purposes.
在大学样本中测试心理咨询中心心理症状评估 34 分的测量不变量
本研究利用心理咨询中心心理症状评估(CCAPS-34)的测量不变量,对大学心理咨询中心转介的大量学生样本(n = 4,013)进行了心理测量分析,并将性别和种族纳入分析范围。所有分量表的内部一致性均得到了证实,所有α和ω均≥.80。七因素模型对所有受试者子群的反应都具有良好到极佳的拟合效果。总样本比较拟合指数为 0.948,均方根近似误差为 0.058 [0.057,0.059],标准化均方根残差为 0.048。在所有性别和种族/族裔身份比较(即白人、黑人、亚洲/太平洋岛民、多种族、拉丁裔/a/x、非拉丁裔/a/x)中,均记录了完全的测量不变量。研究得出结论,CCAPS-34 分量表的分数可以放心地用于不同背景的大学适龄学生的筛选和结果评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信