Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?

IF 1.5 4区社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES

International Development Planning Review Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.3828/idpr.2024.4

Ankit Kumar, Stephanie Butcher, Daniel Hammett, Sandra Barragan-Contreras, Vanessa Burns, Ollie Chesworth, Gregory Cooper, Juan Miguel Kanai, Hannah Mottram, Sammia Poveda, Pamela Richardson

{"title":"Development beyond 2030: more collaboration, less competition?","authors":"Ankit Kumar, Stephanie Butcher, Daniel Hammett, Sandra Barragan-Contreras, Vanessa Burns, Ollie Chesworth, Gregory Cooper, Juan Miguel Kanai, Hannah Mottram, Sammia Poveda, Pamela Richardson","doi":"10.3828/idpr.2024.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represented a key landmark in collaboration and shared agenda-setting to address global challenges across scales and geographies. However, despite initial optimism that measurable goals would support accountability and transparency in development, progress towards realising goals has been mixed. Global development agendas increasingly face challenges from the intensification of climate change, the return of populism and ethnonationalism, and a deepening of inequalities at intra- and inter-national scales.\n This article interrogates the priorities that must inform a critical post-SDG development agenda. To think towards this, we first explore three questions of the development agenda: 1) can development be sustainable? 2) Can development be delivered through markets? And 3) can development be ‘global’? To address these tensions and take a first step towards a more critical post-2030 agenda, we call for a focus on spatialities, multiplicities and historicities of development.","PeriodicalId":46625,"journal":{"name":"International Development Planning Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Development Planning Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2024.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) represented a key landmark in collaboration and shared agenda-setting to address global challenges across scales and geographies. However, despite initial optimism that measurable goals would support accountability and transparency in development, progress towards realising goals has been mixed. Global development agendas increasingly face challenges from the intensification of climate change, the return of populism and ethnonationalism, and a deepening of inequalities at intra- and inter-national scales. This article interrogates the priorities that must inform a critical post-SDG development agenda. To think towards this, we first explore three questions of the development agenda: 1) can development be sustainable? 2) Can development be delivered through markets? And 3) can development be ‘global’? To address these tensions and take a first step towards a more critical post-2030 agenda, we call for a focus on spatialities, multiplicities and historicities of development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

2030 年后的发展：多合作，少竞争？

可持续发展目标（SDGs）是为应对不同规模和地域的全球挑战而开展合作和制定共同议程的重要里程碑。然而，尽管最初人们乐观地认为可衡量的目标将支持发展的问责制和透明度，但在实现目标方面的进展却喜忧参半。全球发展议程日益面临气候变化加剧、民粹主义和民族主义卷土重来以及国内和国家间不平等加剧等挑战。本文探讨了后可持续发展目标发展议程必须考虑的优先事项。为此，我们首先探讨了发展议程的三个问题：1) 发展能否可持续？2) 能否通过市场实现发展？3）发展可以是 "全球性 "的吗？为了解决这些矛盾，并向更具批判性的 2030 年后议程迈出第一步，我们呼吁关注发展的空间性、多重性和历史性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Development Planning Review Multiple-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

6.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： International Development Planning Review’s editorial policy is to reflect international development planning policy and practice. This includes a focus on the physical, economic and social conditions of urban and rural populations. The journal explores current national and international policy agendas, achievements and strategies in this area, offering material of interest to its established academic and professional readership as well as to a broader critical audience.