EVALUATION OF GREENNESS PROFILES OF VARIOUS DEVELOPED METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF COMMONLY USED NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAIDs) IN ENVIRONMENTAL WATERS

B. Sezgin, M. Soyseven
{"title":"EVALUATION OF GREENNESS PROFILES OF VARIOUS DEVELOPED METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF COMMONLY USED NONSTEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS (NSAIDs) IN ENVIRONMENTAL WATERS","authors":"B. Sezgin, M. Soyseven","doi":"10.33483/jfpau.1425350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: In our study, it was aimed to make a comparative analysis of the environmental impact profiles of two approaches including Gas Chromatography (GC) and Liquid Chromatography (LC) methods, which are frequently used techniques for the determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and their metabolites in environmental water samples.\nMaterial and Method: The evaluation of the methods' environmental impact was performed using National Environmental Methods Index Label (NEMI), Analytical Eco-scale, Analytical GREEnness Metric (AGREE), and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI).\nResult and Discussion: The routine analysis of NSAIDs in environmental waters is carried out, resulting in a significant volume of chemical waste. In recent times, there has been a growing significance attributed to environmentally conscious analytical methodologies and the evaluation of methodologies through a green lens to confront this challenge. There is no statistically significant difference in terms of environmental impact profile was observed between the two methods compared.","PeriodicalId":504701,"journal":{"name":"Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"45 37","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33483/jfpau.1425350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In our study, it was aimed to make a comparative analysis of the environmental impact profiles of two approaches including Gas Chromatography (GC) and Liquid Chromatography (LC) methods, which are frequently used techniques for the determination of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and their metabolites in environmental water samples. Material and Method: The evaluation of the methods' environmental impact was performed using National Environmental Methods Index Label (NEMI), Analytical Eco-scale, Analytical GREEnness Metric (AGREE), and Green Analytical Procedure Index (GAPI). Result and Discussion: The routine analysis of NSAIDs in environmental waters is carried out, resulting in a significant volume of chemical waste. In recent times, there has been a growing significance attributed to environmentally conscious analytical methodologies and the evaluation of methodologies through a green lens to confront this challenge. There is no statistically significant difference in terms of environmental impact profile was observed between the two methods compared.
评价用于检测环境水体中常用非甾体抗炎药物(NSAIDs)的各种已开发方法的灰度特征
研究目的我们的研究旨在比较分析两种方法对环境的影响,包括气相色谱法(GC)和液相色谱法(LC),这两种方法是测定环境水样中非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)及其代谢物的常用技术:采用国家环境方法指数标签(NEMI)、分析生态尺度、分析优度(AGREE)和绿色分析程序指数(GAPI)对方法的环境影响进行评价:对环境水体中的非甾体抗炎药进行常规分析会产生大量化学废物。近来,人们越来越重视具有环保意识的分析方法,并通过绿色视角对方法进行评估,以应对这一挑战。经比较,两种方法在环境影响方面没有明显的统计学差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信