Fostering academic resilience in higher education

Blair Carsone, Juliana Bell, Bryce Smith
{"title":"Fostering academic resilience in higher education","authors":"Blair Carsone, Juliana Bell, Bryce Smith","doi":"10.56433/jpaap.v12i1.598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Students who develop resilience are more likely to sustain high levels of achievement, motivation, and performance despite the presence of stressful conditions. \nMethod: Sixty-eight collegiate students completed pre- and post-Academic Resilience Scale-30 assessments before and after a brief, virtual educational program on common resilience strategies. Subjects then ranked the strategies in the educational program as “most helpful” and “least helpful.” \nResults: Data analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between pre- and post- Academic Resilience Scale-30 scores, suggesting that the educational program improved resilience. \nDiscussion: Subject ranking of strategies further revealed that the most helpful strategies were mantras and cost/benefit analysis while the least helpful strategies were mantras, writing down feelings, and cost-benefit analysis. \nConclusion: Educational resilience programs have the potential to improve resilience amongst students enrolled in higher education. However, due to the conflicting opinions found in the rankings of strategies, future studies and resilience programs should focus on providing a variety of strategies to best support a diverse student population.","PeriodicalId":498818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice","volume":"47 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56433/jpaap.v12i1.598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Students who develop resilience are more likely to sustain high levels of achievement, motivation, and performance despite the presence of stressful conditions. Method: Sixty-eight collegiate students completed pre- and post-Academic Resilience Scale-30 assessments before and after a brief, virtual educational program on common resilience strategies. Subjects then ranked the strategies in the educational program as “most helpful” and “least helpful.” Results: Data analysis revealed that there was a statistically significant difference between pre- and post- Academic Resilience Scale-30 scores, suggesting that the educational program improved resilience. Discussion: Subject ranking of strategies further revealed that the most helpful strategies were mantras and cost/benefit analysis while the least helpful strategies were mantras, writing down feelings, and cost-benefit analysis. Conclusion: Educational resilience programs have the potential to improve resilience amongst students enrolled in higher education. However, due to the conflicting opinions found in the rankings of strategies, future studies and resilience programs should focus on providing a variety of strategies to best support a diverse student population.
在高等教育中培养学术适应能力
导言:培养抗压能力的学生更有可能在压力条件下保持高水平的成就、动力和表现。研究方法68 名大学生在参加一个关于常见抗压策略的简短虚拟教育项目前后,分别完成了 "学业抗压量表-30 "评估。然后,受试者将教育课程中的策略分为 "最有帮助 "和 "帮助最小 "两个等级。结果数据分析显示,学业恢复力量表-30 测试前后的得分在统计学上有显著差异,表明该教育项目提高了学生的恢复力。讨论受试者的策略排序进一步显示,最有帮助的策略是咒语和成本效益分析,而最无帮助的策略是咒语、写下感受和成本效益分析。结论教育抗逆力计划有可能提高高校学生的抗逆力。然而,由于在策略排名中发现了相互冲突的观点,未来的研究和抗逆力计划应侧重于提供各种策略,以便为不同的学生群体提供最佳支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信