The role of the new institutional sociology in implementing the environmental agenda

Luis De Macêdo Neto, Isabel Lausanne Fontgalland
{"title":"The role of the new institutional sociology in implementing the environmental agenda","authors":"Luis De Macêdo Neto, Isabel Lausanne Fontgalland","doi":"10.52664/rima.v6.n1.2024.e241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new institutional Sociology declares that organizations, whether public or private, are influenced by norms, customs and beliefs institutionalized in their structure. Therefore, it is possible to infer that these factors can also influence organizations' actions regarding the environment and sustainability. Based on this understanding, we sought to investigate the role of the new institutional Sociology in the implementation of the environmental agenda. Given the purpose of this work, it is possible to classify it as bibliographic and exploratory in nature. Scientific articles, books, reports and other secondary data of national and international origin were used as theoretical support for the research. In the context of the environmental agenda, institutions can materialize in the form of laws, regulations, public policies, positioning of the professional class, behavior of successful organizations, consumer preferences and many other factors. It was noticed that institutions pressure organizations to develop sustainable practices and these, in turn, enable environmental conservation without necessarily impeding economic development. It was also possible to identify that the pressures felt by organizations to adopt similar environmental practices are explained through the phenomenon understood as institutional isomorphism. This occurs in three ways: coercive; mimetic and normative. Furthermore, this study allowed us to understand the levels of implementation of an environmental agenda. However, it was observed that agendas can be implemented at global, national and local levels. And, the adoption of environmentally sustainable practices in organizations is motivated, above all, by the need to legitimize organizations.","PeriodicalId":447159,"journal":{"name":"REVISTA INTERDISCIPLINAR E DO MEIO AMBIENTE (RIMA)","volume":"23 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVISTA INTERDISCIPLINAR E DO MEIO AMBIENTE (RIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52664/rima.v6.n1.2024.e241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new institutional Sociology declares that organizations, whether public or private, are influenced by norms, customs and beliefs institutionalized in their structure. Therefore, it is possible to infer that these factors can also influence organizations' actions regarding the environment and sustainability. Based on this understanding, we sought to investigate the role of the new institutional Sociology in the implementation of the environmental agenda. Given the purpose of this work, it is possible to classify it as bibliographic and exploratory in nature. Scientific articles, books, reports and other secondary data of national and international origin were used as theoretical support for the research. In the context of the environmental agenda, institutions can materialize in the form of laws, regulations, public policies, positioning of the professional class, behavior of successful organizations, consumer preferences and many other factors. It was noticed that institutions pressure organizations to develop sustainable practices and these, in turn, enable environmental conservation without necessarily impeding economic development. It was also possible to identify that the pressures felt by organizations to adopt similar environmental practices are explained through the phenomenon understood as institutional isomorphism. This occurs in three ways: coercive; mimetic and normative. Furthermore, this study allowed us to understand the levels of implementation of an environmental agenda. However, it was observed that agendas can be implemented at global, national and local levels. And, the adoption of environmentally sustainable practices in organizations is motivated, above all, by the need to legitimize organizations.
新制度社会学在实施环境议程中的作用
新制度社会学宣称,无论是公共组织还是私营组织,都会受到其结构中制度化的规范、习俗和信仰的影响。因此,可以推断这些因素也会影响组织在环境和可持续性方面的行动。基于这一认识,我们试图调查新的制度社会学在实施环境议程中的作用。鉴于这项工作的目的,可以将其归类为书目和探索性质。研究使用了国内外的科学文章、书籍、报告和其他二手资料作为理论支持。在环境议程的背景下,制度可以以法律、法规、公共政策、专业阶层的定位、成功组织的行为、消费者偏好和许多其他因素的形式具体化。人们注意到,制度迫使各组织制定可持续的做法,而这些做法反过来又促进了环境保 护,但不一定阻碍经济发展。我们还发现,各组织感受到的采取类似环保做法的压力可以通过被理解为制度同构的现象来解释。这种现象以三种方式出现:强制性、模仿性和规范性。此外,这项研究还让我们了解了环境议程的实施程度。然而,我们注意到,议程可以在全球、国家和地方各级实施。而且,各组织采用环境上可持续的做法,首先是出于使组织合法化的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信