Three once-weekly intra-articular injections of Hylan G-F 20 significantly improve pain relief compared with placebo in patients with chronic idiopathic knee osteoarthritis: a single-centre, evaluator-blinded and patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial

Michael Langworthy, Peter Lascarides, Wilson Ngai, Kevin Steele, Yili Huang
{"title":"Three once-weekly intra-articular injections of Hylan G-F 20 significantly improve pain relief compared with placebo in patients with chronic idiopathic knee osteoarthritis: a single-centre, evaluator-blinded and patient-blinded, randomized controlled trial","authors":"Michael Langworthy, Peter Lascarides, Wilson Ngai, Kevin Steele, Yili Huang","doi":"10.7573/dic.2023-11-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Clinical trials on the use of viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are inconsistent, making it challenging to determine its value in clinical practice. One issue is the availability of various HA products on the market; differences in their chemical features can impact patient outcomes. Herein, we assess the efficacy and safety of three once-weekly intra-articular (IA) injections of Hylan G-F 20, a high-molecular-weight and highly crosslinked HA product, in patients with KOA. We hypothesized that Hylan G-F 20 would provide significant pain relief with no increased safety risk compared with IA saline (placebo). Methods This was a 26-week, patient-blinded and evaluator-blinded, single-centre, randomized placebo- controlled trial. Men or women ≥18 years of age with Larsen grade II or III KOA were included. Patients received IA injections of either Hylan G-F 20 or placebo once a week for 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the week 12 and 26 visits. Primary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, patient activity level and an overall assessment of clinical condition. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) that emerged during treatment. The primary analysis included the intention-to-treat population. An alpha level of 0.05 was used in the statistical analysis. Results Thirty patients were included in the intention-to-treat population (15 per group). All efficacy outcomes were statistically significant in favour of Hylan G-F 20, except night pain and inactivity stiffness, for both patient- assessed (all p=0.0001 at week 12) and evaluator-assessed (all p=0.0001 at week 12 and p=0.0004–0.0180 at week 26) measurements. There was also a greater proportion of symptom-free patients and those with a >50% improvement in their VAS scores, except night pain, in the Hylan G-F 20 group (p=0.001–0.003 in patient-assessed scores and p<0.0001 to 0.002 in evaluator-assessed scores at week 12). Two patients, one in each group, experienced an AE; no sequelae occurred, and no special treatment was required for either AE. No patients withdrew from the study prematurely due to an AE. Conclusion In patients with chronic idiopathic KOA, Hylan G-F 20 provides significant improvements in pain relief compared with placebo with no added safety concerns.","PeriodicalId":502654,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Context","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Context","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2023-11-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Clinical trials on the use of viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid (HA) in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) are inconsistent, making it challenging to determine its value in clinical practice. One issue is the availability of various HA products on the market; differences in their chemical features can impact patient outcomes. Herein, we assess the efficacy and safety of three once-weekly intra-articular (IA) injections of Hylan G-F 20, a high-molecular-weight and highly crosslinked HA product, in patients with KOA. We hypothesized that Hylan G-F 20 would provide significant pain relief with no increased safety risk compared with IA saline (placebo). Methods This was a 26-week, patient-blinded and evaluator-blinded, single-centre, randomized placebo- controlled trial. Men or women ≥18 years of age with Larsen grade II or III KOA were included. Patients received IA injections of either Hylan G-F 20 or placebo once a week for 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the week 12 and 26 visits. Primary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, patient activity level and an overall assessment of clinical condition. Secondary outcomes included adverse events (AEs) that emerged during treatment. The primary analysis included the intention-to-treat population. An alpha level of 0.05 was used in the statistical analysis. Results Thirty patients were included in the intention-to-treat population (15 per group). All efficacy outcomes were statistically significant in favour of Hylan G-F 20, except night pain and inactivity stiffness, for both patient- assessed (all p=0.0001 at week 12) and evaluator-assessed (all p=0.0001 at week 12 and p=0.0004–0.0180 at week 26) measurements. There was also a greater proportion of symptom-free patients and those with a >50% improvement in their VAS scores, except night pain, in the Hylan G-F 20 group (p=0.001–0.003 in patient-assessed scores and p<0.0001 to 0.002 in evaluator-assessed scores at week 12). Two patients, one in each group, experienced an AE; no sequelae occurred, and no special treatment was required for either AE. No patients withdrew from the study prematurely due to an AE. Conclusion In patients with chronic idiopathic KOA, Hylan G-F 20 provides significant improvements in pain relief compared with placebo with no added safety concerns.
与安慰剂相比,慢性特发性膝骨关节炎患者每周三次的关节内注射 Hylan G-F 20 可明显改善疼痛缓解:单中心、评估者盲法和患者盲法随机对照试验
背景 在膝关节骨性关节炎(KOA)患者中使用透明质酸(HA)进行粘度补充的临床试验结果并不一致,因此确定其在临床实践中的价值具有挑战性。其中一个问题是市场上有各种不同的透明质酸产品,其化学特性的差异会影响患者的治疗效果。在此,我们评估了 KOA 患者每周三次、每次关节内注射高分子量、高交联 HA 产品 Hylan G-F 20 的疗效和安全性。我们假设,与注射生理盐水(安慰剂)相比,Hylan G-F 20 可显著缓解疼痛,且不会增加安全风险。方法 这是一项为期 26 周、患者盲法和评估者盲法、单中心、随机安慰剂对照试验。试验对象包括年龄≥18岁、患有拉森II级或III级KOA的男性或女性。患者接受海兰 G-F 20 或安慰剂的 IA 注射,每周一次,持续 3 周。主要终点为第12周和第26周。主要疗效结果包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、患者活动水平和临床状况总体评估。次要结果包括治疗期间出现的不良事件(AEs)。主要分析包括意向治疗人群。统计分析采用 0.05 的阿尔法水平。结果 30 名患者被纳入意向治疗人群(每组 15 人)。在患者评估(第12周时均为p=0.0001)和评估者评估(第12周时均为p=0.0001,第26周时均为p=0.0004-0.0180)的测量结果中,除夜间疼痛和活动僵硬外,所有疗效结果在统计学上均显著优于Hylan G-F 20。此外,除夜间疼痛外,海兰 G-F 20 组中无症状和 VAS 评分改善大于 50% 的患者比例更高(第 12 周时患者评估评分的 p=0.001-0.003 和评估者评估评分的 p<0.0001 至 0.002)。有两名患者(每组各一名)出现了 AE,但没有出现后遗症,也不需要对这两种 AE 进行特殊治疗。没有患者因AE而提前退出研究。结论 在慢性特发性 KOA 患者中,与安慰剂相比,Hylan G-F 20 的止痛效果显著,且不增加安全性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信