Evaluation of Post-Operative Pain Subsequent to Endodontic Treatment Utilizing Hand and Pedoflex Rotary files in Primary Mandibular Molars: A Clinical Investigation

Arun Vashisht, Arundhati Sharma, Amandeep Kaur Sandhu
{"title":"Evaluation of Post-Operative Pain Subsequent to Endodontic Treatment Utilizing Hand and Pedoflex Rotary files in Primary Mandibular Molars: A Clinical Investigation","authors":"Arun Vashisht, Arundhati Sharma, Amandeep Kaur Sandhu","doi":"10.58624/svoade.2024.05.0170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To comparatively evaluate postoperative pain levels following root canal instrumentation with hand files versus Pedoflex rotary files in primary mandibular molars. Material and Methods: This randomized clinical trial involved 60 children aged 6-10 years with primary mandibular molars requiring pulpectomy. They were divided into two groups: Group I received hand K file instrumentation, and Group II was treated with Pedoflex rotary files. Pain levels were recorded using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Results: The Pedoflex rotary file group experienced significantly lower pain scores at all time intervals compared to the hand K file group (p<0.05). The mean pain score in Group A gradually decreased from 6 to 72 hours, while Group B showed a more rapid decline in the first 24 hours followed by a plateau. Conclusion: The use of Pedoflex rotary files for root canal instrumentation in primary mandibular molars significantly reduces postoperative pain when compared to conventional hand files. These findings suggest that rotary files may provide a more comfortable postoperative experience for pediatric patients undergoing pulpectomy","PeriodicalId":93501,"journal":{"name":"SVOA Dentistry","volume":"45 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SVOA Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58624/svoade.2024.05.0170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To comparatively evaluate postoperative pain levels following root canal instrumentation with hand files versus Pedoflex rotary files in primary mandibular molars. Material and Methods: This randomized clinical trial involved 60 children aged 6-10 years with primary mandibular molars requiring pulpectomy. They were divided into two groups: Group I received hand K file instrumentation, and Group II was treated with Pedoflex rotary files. Pain levels were recorded using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Results: The Pedoflex rotary file group experienced significantly lower pain scores at all time intervals compared to the hand K file group (p<0.05). The mean pain score in Group A gradually decreased from 6 to 72 hours, while Group B showed a more rapid decline in the first 24 hours followed by a plateau. Conclusion: The use of Pedoflex rotary files for root canal instrumentation in primary mandibular molars significantly reduces postoperative pain when compared to conventional hand files. These findings suggest that rotary files may provide a more comfortable postoperative experience for pediatric patients undergoing pulpectomy
使用手动和 Pedoflex 旋转锉对初级下颌磨牙进行牙髓治疗后的术后疼痛评估:临床研究
目的:比较评估使用手动锉和 Pedoflex 旋转锉对初级下颌磨牙进行根管器械治疗后的术后疼痛程度。材料与方法:这项随机临床试验涉及 60 名 6-10 岁需要进行牙髓切除术的原发性下颌磨牙患儿。他们被分为两组:第一组接受手工K锉器械治疗,第二组使用Pedoflex旋转锉治疗。在术后 6、12、24、48 和 72 小时,使用 Wong-Baker FACES 疼痛评分量表记录疼痛程度。结果:在所有时间间隔内,Pedoflex 旋转锉组的疼痛评分均明显低于手 K 锉组(P<0.05)。A 组的平均疼痛评分在 6 至 72 小时内逐渐下降,而 B 组在最初的 24 小时内下降较快,随后趋于平稳。结论与传统手工锉相比,使用 Pedoflex 旋转锉进行下颌磨牙根管器械治疗可显著减少术后疼痛。这些研究结果表明,旋转锉可以为接受牙髓切除术的儿童患者提供更舒适的术后体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信