Comparative analysis of tracer studies in the determination of longitudinal dispersion coefficient

Chinedu Ukpaka, J. Agunwamba
{"title":"Comparative analysis of tracer studies in the determination of longitudinal dispersion coefficient","authors":"Chinedu Ukpaka, J. Agunwamba","doi":"10.2166/wst.2024.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The research presented on this paper is to determine the best tracer studies that will give acceptable estimate of longitudinal dispersion coefficient for Orashi river using Rhodamine WT dye and Sodium chloride as water tracer. Estimated results obtained for longitudinal dispersion coefficient for the case of Rhodamine WT experiment ranges between 71 and 104.4 m2s−1 and while that of Sodium chloride experiment ranges 20.1 and 34.71 m2s−1. These results revealed lower dispersion coefficient using Sodium chloride as water tracer (WT) indicating that for larger rivers, Sodium chloride should not be used as water tracer. The usage of Sodium Chloride as water tracer in the estimation of longitudinal dispersion coefficient is recommended in smaller streams as Nacl is relatively conservative. The established equations for both cases of investigation are proofing satisfactory upon validation as degree of accuracy of 100.0% were obtained using discrepancy ratio , standard error (SE), normal mean error (NME) and mean multiplication error (MME) of the developed equations is better when compared with others existing equations. However, Equation (17) is satisfactorily recommended.","PeriodicalId":298320,"journal":{"name":"Water Science & Technology","volume":"138 S249","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2024.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research presented on this paper is to determine the best tracer studies that will give acceptable estimate of longitudinal dispersion coefficient for Orashi river using Rhodamine WT dye and Sodium chloride as water tracer. Estimated results obtained for longitudinal dispersion coefficient for the case of Rhodamine WT experiment ranges between 71 and 104.4 m2s−1 and while that of Sodium chloride experiment ranges 20.1 and 34.71 m2s−1. These results revealed lower dispersion coefficient using Sodium chloride as water tracer (WT) indicating that for larger rivers, Sodium chloride should not be used as water tracer. The usage of Sodium Chloride as water tracer in the estimation of longitudinal dispersion coefficient is recommended in smaller streams as Nacl is relatively conservative. The established equations for both cases of investigation are proofing satisfactory upon validation as degree of accuracy of 100.0% were obtained using discrepancy ratio , standard error (SE), normal mean error (NME) and mean multiplication error (MME) of the developed equations is better when compared with others existing equations. However, Equation (17) is satisfactorily recommended.
确定纵向弥散系数的示踪研究比较分析
本文介绍的研究旨在确定最佳示踪剂研究,以便使用罗丹明 WT 染料和氯化钠作为水示踪剂,对鄂拉石河的纵向弥散系数进行可接受的估算。罗丹明 WT 实验的纵向弥散系数估计结果介于 71 至 104.4 m2s-1 之间,而氯化钠实验的纵向弥散系数估计结果介于 20.1 至 34.71 m2s-1 之间。这些结果表明,使用氯化钠作为水示踪剂(WT)的分散系数较低,这表明对于较大的河流,不应使用氯化钠作为水示踪剂。在较小的河流中,建议使用氯化钠作为水示踪剂来估算纵向弥散系数,因为 Nacl 相对保守。与其他现有方程相比,所建立的两个调查方程在验证后都证明是令人满意的,因为使用差异比、标准误差(SE)、正常平均误差(NME)和平均乘法误差(MME)得出的准确度为 100.0%。不过,公式 (17) 值得推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信