Adaptation of the Perception of Organizational Policy Scale (POPS) M. Kacmar and D. Carlson: Analysis of Internal Structure

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
L. Mararitsa, T. A. Kinunen, S. Gurieva, T. G. Yanicheva, E. Yumkina
{"title":"Adaptation of the Perception of Organizational Policy Scale (POPS) M. Kacmar and D. Carlson: Analysis of Internal Structure","authors":"L. Mararitsa, T. A. Kinunen, S. Gurieva, T. G. Yanicheva, E. Yumkina","doi":"10.17759/sps.2024150111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. The first stage in adapting the Organizational Policy Perception Scale (POPS) by M. Kacmar and D. Carlson in a Russian-speaking sample: analysis of the internal structure and reliability of the questionnaire. Background. The political nature of the organization is obvious. There are practically no tools that allow you to assess how “politicized” organization is. We need to measure to what extent people are targets of intrigues and informal influence or of unfair distribution of resources in the organization. Can they express their opinion without negative consequences or get a transparent and fair career path? All these questions is of great importance for both the individual and the organization. The best-known tool for studying the subjective assessment of organizational politics is the Organizational Policy Perception Scale (POPS) by M. Kacmar and D. Carlson. This scale was not adapted to the Russian-speaking sample. Study design. The study was carried out in the form of a survey of two samples of people using the “Perceptions of Organizational Politics” (POPS) scale by M. Kacmar and D. Carlson, which was translated into Russian. Participants. The study was conducted on two samples: 407 (52% women) and 575 (100% women) subjects. Measurements. To process and analyze the data, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and correlation analysis, and a criterion for comparing mean values were used in the Rstudio statistic environment. Results. In the first sample, it was shown that the scale has good indicators of reliability and model data fit. And, as a result of the exploratory analysis, it was suggested that the exclusion of reverse questions from the scale would improve the internal structure of the questionnaire, the model data fit. It was shown in the analysis of second independent sample data. Scale reliability scores were found to be high, 0,91-0,93 (Cronbach's alpha). Conclusions. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, we were able to confirm the original three-factor model of the questionnaire. Adaptation of the POPS methodology on a Russian-speaking sample will allow us to study the organizational culture and perception of the organization by the employee in Russian companies.","PeriodicalId":54079,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17759/sps.2024150111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. The first stage in adapting the Organizational Policy Perception Scale (POPS) by M. Kacmar and D. Carlson in a Russian-speaking sample: analysis of the internal structure and reliability of the questionnaire. Background. The political nature of the organization is obvious. There are practically no tools that allow you to assess how “politicized” organization is. We need to measure to what extent people are targets of intrigues and informal influence or of unfair distribution of resources in the organization. Can they express their opinion without negative consequences or get a transparent and fair career path? All these questions is of great importance for both the individual and the organization. The best-known tool for studying the subjective assessment of organizational politics is the Organizational Policy Perception Scale (POPS) by M. Kacmar and D. Carlson. This scale was not adapted to the Russian-speaking sample. Study design. The study was carried out in the form of a survey of two samples of people using the “Perceptions of Organizational Politics” (POPS) scale by M. Kacmar and D. Carlson, which was translated into Russian. Participants. The study was conducted on two samples: 407 (52% women) and 575 (100% women) subjects. Measurements. To process and analyze the data, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyzes, Cronbach's alpha coefficient and correlation analysis, and a criterion for comparing mean values were used in the Rstudio statistic environment. Results. In the first sample, it was shown that the scale has good indicators of reliability and model data fit. And, as a result of the exploratory analysis, it was suggested that the exclusion of reverse questions from the scale would improve the internal structure of the questionnaire, the model data fit. It was shown in the analysis of second independent sample data. Scale reliability scores were found to be high, 0,91-0,93 (Cronbach's alpha). Conclusions. As a result of confirmatory factor analysis, we were able to confirm the original three-factor model of the questionnaire. Adaptation of the POPS methodology on a Russian-speaking sample will allow us to study the organizational culture and perception of the organization by the employee in Russian companies.
组织政策感量表(POPS)的改编 M. Kacmar 和 D. Carlson:内部结构分析
目的。在俄语样本中改编 M. Kacmar 和 D. Carlson 的组织政策认知量表 (POPS) 的第一阶段:分析问卷的内部结构和可靠性。背景。组织的政治性是显而易见的。实际上,没有任何工具可以评估组织的 "政治化 "程度。我们需要衡量人们在多大程度上成为阴谋和非正式影响的目标,或在多大程度上成为组织中资源分配不公平的目标。他们在表达自己的意见时能否不受到负面影响,或者能否获得透明、公平的职业发展道路?所有这些问题对个人和组织都非常重要。研究组织政治主观评估的最著名工具是 M. Kacmar 和 D. Carlson 编制的组织政策感知量表(POPS)。该量表并不适合俄语样本。研究设计。研究采用 M. Kacmar 和 D. Carlson 编制的 "组织政治感知量表"(POPS)对两个样本进行调查,该量表已被翻译成俄文。参与者。研究针对两个样本进行:分别为 407 人(52% 为女性)和 575 人(100% 为女性)。测量。为了处理和分析数据,在 Rstudio 统计环境中使用了探索性和确认性因素分析、Cronbach's alpha 系数和相关分析,以及比较平均值的标准。结果在第一个样本中,量表具有良好的信度指标和模型数据拟合指标。而且,探索性分析结果表明,从量表中剔除反向问题将改善问卷的内部结构和模型数据拟合度。第二次独立样本数据分析显示。量表信度得分很高,为 0.91-0.93 (克朗巴赫α)。结论通过确认性因素分析,我们确认了问卷最初的三因素模型。在俄语样本中采用 POPS 方法,将使我们能够研究俄罗斯公司的组织文化和员工对组织的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology and Society
Social Psychology and Society PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
25.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信