Advancements in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair—Current State of the Art

Surgeries Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.3390/surgeries5020022
F. Bosco, G. Rovere, Fortunato Giustra, Virginia Masoni, Salvatore Cassaro, M. Capella, Salvatore Risitano, L. Sabatini, Ludovico Lucenti, Lawrence Camarda
{"title":"Advancements in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair—Current State of the Art","authors":"F. Bosco, G. Rovere, Fortunato Giustra, Virginia Masoni, Salvatore Cassaro, M. Capella, Salvatore Risitano, L. Sabatini, Ludovico Lucenti, Lawrence Camarda","doi":"10.3390/surgeries5020022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) has been considered the gold standard for ACL tears, renewed interest in ACL repair has emerged. This review aims to examine the current knowledge regarding ACL repair. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, focusing on the most recent studies up to January 2024. Arthroscopic ACL repair has several advantages, such as resulting in a natural ligament with proprioceptive properties, preservation, and donor graft comorbidity absence. Several ACL repair surgical procedures have been developed thanks to the advancement in new fixation devices. The current literature showed that when performed on a suitable patient with the appropriate lesion type, corresponding to the proximal third with good tissue quality, ACL repair leads to satisfactory outcomes. Despite the benefits of ACL repair with promising results, ACL-R remains the gold standard for ACL lesions. There is still a lack of literature analyzing long-term outcomes; large series with homogenous populations and types of lesions are lacking. Based on the current evidence, further research and higher-quality studies investigating ACL repair will be necessary.","PeriodicalId":506240,"journal":{"name":"Surgeries","volume":"2007 36","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/surgeries5020022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) has been considered the gold standard for ACL tears, renewed interest in ACL repair has emerged. This review aims to examine the current knowledge regarding ACL repair. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase databases, focusing on the most recent studies up to January 2024. Arthroscopic ACL repair has several advantages, such as resulting in a natural ligament with proprioceptive properties, preservation, and donor graft comorbidity absence. Several ACL repair surgical procedures have been developed thanks to the advancement in new fixation devices. The current literature showed that when performed on a suitable patient with the appropriate lesion type, corresponding to the proximal third with good tissue quality, ACL repair leads to satisfactory outcomes. Despite the benefits of ACL repair with promising results, ACL-R remains the gold standard for ACL lesions. There is still a lack of literature analyzing long-term outcomes; large series with homogenous populations and types of lesions are lacking. Based on the current evidence, further research and higher-quality studies investigating ACL repair will be necessary.
前十字韧带修复术的进展--目前的技术水平
虽然前交叉韧带重建术(ACL-R)一直被认为是治疗前交叉韧带撕裂的黄金标准,但人们对前交叉韧带修复术的兴趣又重新燃起。本综述旨在研究当前有关前交叉韧带修复的知识。我们在 PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Embase 数据库中进行了全面的文献检索,重点关注截至 2024 年 1 月的最新研究。关节镜下前交叉韧带修复术有几个优点,如修复后的韧带具有本体感觉特性、保存性好、供体移植物无合并症等。由于新型固定装置的进步,已经开发出多种前交叉韧带修复手术方法。目前的文献显示,如果前交叉韧带修复手术是在合适的患者身上进行,且患者的病变类型与组织质量良好的近端三分之一处相对应,就能取得令人满意的效果。尽管前交叉韧带修复术有很多优点,而且效果良好,但前交叉韧带修复术仍是治疗前交叉韧带病变的金标准。目前仍缺乏对长期疗效进行分析的文献;也缺乏同质人群和病变类型的大型系列研究。基于目前的证据,有必要对前交叉韧带修复进行进一步研究和更高质量的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信