Emotional Experiences and Their Connection With Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Differences

Q4 Psychology
Tetiana Yablonska, N. Bulatevych, Lilia Sirokha
{"title":"Emotional Experiences and Their Connection With Coping Strategies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Gender Differences","authors":"Tetiana Yablonska, N. Bulatevych, Lilia Sirokha","doi":"10.18290/rpsych2024.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study was conducted in Ukraine during the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. The sample contained 232 individuals. The aim was to study emotional experiences and their connection with coping strategies in the context of gender differences. The research was based on the concept of differential emotions, and on the understanding of the accumulation strategies as a dynamic process, which is determined by personal prepositions and situational factors. Measures used in the study were the Differential Emotions Scale and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. The growth of negative experiences and stress at the beginning of the pandemic among men and women was confirmed. We described the differences regarding emotions and coping strategies. Women use emotion-focused strategies of social support, strategies of positive reappraisal of the situation, and avoidance, the acceptance of responsibility among women is associated with negative emotions. We found that women more frequently use two or more coping strategies compared to men. A different emotional basis of coping strategies, expressed at high levels of tension among men and women, was revealed. The defined features of coping behavior among men and women may help to determine the main goals for the development of preventive and psychotherapeutic interventions.","PeriodicalId":38005,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Psychologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych2024.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study was conducted in Ukraine during the onset of COVID-19 pandemic. The sample contained 232 individuals. The aim was to study emotional experiences and their connection with coping strategies in the context of gender differences. The research was based on the concept of differential emotions, and on the understanding of the accumulation strategies as a dynamic process, which is determined by personal prepositions and situational factors. Measures used in the study were the Differential Emotions Scale and the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. The growth of negative experiences and stress at the beginning of the pandemic among men and women was confirmed. We described the differences regarding emotions and coping strategies. Women use emotion-focused strategies of social support, strategies of positive reappraisal of the situation, and avoidance, the acceptance of responsibility among women is associated with negative emotions. We found that women more frequently use two or more coping strategies compared to men. A different emotional basis of coping strategies, expressed at high levels of tension among men and women, was revealed. The defined features of coping behavior among men and women may help to determine the main goals for the development of preventive and psychotherapeutic interventions.
COVID-19 大流行期间的情感经历及其与应对策略的联系:性别差异
这项研究是在 COVID-19 大流行期间在乌克兰进行的。样本包含 232 人。目的是研究性别差异背景下的情绪体验及其与应对策略之间的联系。研究基于 "差异情绪 "的概念,并将积累策略理解为一个动态过程,由个人前提条件和情境因素决定。研究采用的测量方法是差异情绪量表和应对方式问卷。研究证实,在大流行初期,男性和女性的负面经历和压力都有所增加。我们描述了情绪和应对策略方面的差异。女性使用以情绪为中心的社会支持策略、积极重新评估情况的策略和回避策略,女性承担责任与负面情绪有关。我们发现,与男性相比,女性更经常使用两种或两种以上的应对策略。男女在高度紧张时表现出的应对策略的情绪基础不同。男女应对行为的特征有助于确定制定预防和心理治疗干预措施的主要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Roczniki Psychologiczne
Roczniki Psychologiczne Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Roczniki Psychologiczne / Annals of Psychology, the continuation of Annals of Philosophy: Psychology, is an academic journal edited by The Scientific Society of the John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin [Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL]. It aims to present up-to-date and original empirical results and influential theoretical considerations in various areas of psychology as well as to promote new and creative ideas in research and psychological methods. The Journal accepts contributions of three kinds: 1) original peer reviewed articles on both empirical and conceptual topics, 2) short communications, and 3) polemics, which consist of a focus article followed by peer commentaries and a response by the author of the focus article.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信