Indonesian orthodontists and laypeople’s perception of the four components of smile analysis in individuals with various vertical skeletal patterns

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Mutiara Subono, B. Soegiharto, H. Anggani
{"title":"Indonesian orthodontists and laypeople’s perception of the four components of smile analysis in individuals with various vertical skeletal patterns","authors":"Mutiara Subono, B. Soegiharto, H. Anggani","doi":"10.25259/apos_178_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe objective of this study was to analyze the difference towards orthodontists’ and laypeople’s perceptions of four smile analysis components in individuals with various vertical skeletal patterns.\n\n\n\nEach of the 100 orthodontists, and laypeople aged 26–65 years old were asked to complete an online questionnaire about four smile analysis components in individuals with various vertical skeletal patterns. The questionnaire consists of 36 modified photos according to various smile curves, buccal corridors, gingival displays, and incisor displays in normal, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent skeletal patterns. Perceptions were assessed using a visual analog scale.\n\n\n\nSignificant differences were found in straight and parallel smile curve, maximum buccal corridor, and gingival display 4 mm components in all vertical skeletal patterns. Additionally, differences were also found in the medium buccal corridor in hypodivergent skeletal pattern, gingival display 2 mm in normal and hypodivergent skeletal patterns. Moreover, significant differences were also observed in the 100% incisor display in normal vertical skeletal pattern, and 50% incisor display in hyperdivergent skeletal pattern\n\n\n\nOrthodontists and laypeople have similar perceptions toward the most esthetic components (parallel smile curve, minimum buccal corridor, gingival display 0 mm, and incisor display 75%) in all vertical skeletal patterns.\n","PeriodicalId":42593,"journal":{"name":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APOS Trends in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/apos_178_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to analyze the difference towards orthodontists’ and laypeople’s perceptions of four smile analysis components in individuals with various vertical skeletal patterns. Each of the 100 orthodontists, and laypeople aged 26–65 years old were asked to complete an online questionnaire about four smile analysis components in individuals with various vertical skeletal patterns. The questionnaire consists of 36 modified photos according to various smile curves, buccal corridors, gingival displays, and incisor displays in normal, hypodivergent, and hyperdivergent skeletal patterns. Perceptions were assessed using a visual analog scale. Significant differences were found in straight and parallel smile curve, maximum buccal corridor, and gingival display 4 mm components in all vertical skeletal patterns. Additionally, differences were also found in the medium buccal corridor in hypodivergent skeletal pattern, gingival display 2 mm in normal and hypodivergent skeletal patterns. Moreover, significant differences were also observed in the 100% incisor display in normal vertical skeletal pattern, and 50% incisor display in hyperdivergent skeletal pattern Orthodontists and laypeople have similar perceptions toward the most esthetic components (parallel smile curve, minimum buccal corridor, gingival display 0 mm, and incisor display 75%) in all vertical skeletal patterns.
印尼正畸医生和非专业人士对不同垂直骨骼模式个体微笑分析四个组成部分的看法
本研究的目的是分析正畸医生和非专业人士对不同垂直骨骼形态个体的四种微笑分析要素的认知差异。100 名年龄在 26-65 岁之间的正畸医生和非专业人士每人都被要求完成一份关于不同垂直骨骼形态个体的四种微笑分析要素的在线问卷。该问卷由 36 张修改过的照片组成,按照正常、低发散和高发散骨骼模式中的不同微笑曲线、颊部走廊、牙龈显示和门牙显示进行了修改。在所有垂直骨骼模式中,直线和平行微笑曲线、最大颊面角和牙龈显示4毫米部分均存在显著差异。此外,在下偏离骨架模式中的中等颊廊,正常和下偏离骨架模式中的牙龈显示2毫米也存在差异。牙科医生和普通人对所有垂直骨骼模式中最美观的部分(平行微笑曲线、最小颊面走廊、牙龈显示0毫米和切牙显示75%)的看法相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
APOS Trends in Orthodontics
APOS Trends in Orthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信