Hugh Lacey and values in contemporary science: era of technology and crises

Concilium Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.53660/clm-3259-24g38
Millena Moreira Fontes, Maralysa Correia de Souza Cavalcanti, Maria José Nascimento Soares, Núbia Dias dos Santos
{"title":"Hugh Lacey and values in contemporary science: era of technology and crises","authors":"Millena Moreira Fontes, Maralysa Correia de Souza Cavalcanti, Maria José Nascimento Soares, Núbia Dias dos Santos","doi":"10.53660/clm-3259-24g38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides an understanding of Hugh Lacey's ideas regarding the influence of values in contemporary science. We explore the interaction between scientific activity and values, fostering critical awareness of scientific practice and its impact on society. The aim is to fill gaps in the comprehension of cognitive, social, and ethical values, considering how they have been shaped by technological transformations and sociocultural crises. A comprehensive literature review examines Lacey's key tenets presented in works such as \"Values and Scientific Activity 1 and 2\" and Oliveira's \"From Cognitive Science to Dialectic\", as well as articles in scientific databases and communications with the philosopher in 2023. According to him, values and science should be intrinsically linked, provided there is impartiality in scientific assessments. This relationship does not compromise the ongoing pursuit of a robust understanding of the phenomena in the world. The results highlight the relevance of Lacey's perspectives on values in contemporary science, as in contexts such as transgenic research, which raises crucial ethical questions. The applications of such research can have profound impacts, highlighting the importance of ethics.","PeriodicalId":505714,"journal":{"name":"Concilium","volume":"10 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concilium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53660/clm-3259-24g38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article provides an understanding of Hugh Lacey's ideas regarding the influence of values in contemporary science. We explore the interaction between scientific activity and values, fostering critical awareness of scientific practice and its impact on society. The aim is to fill gaps in the comprehension of cognitive, social, and ethical values, considering how they have been shaped by technological transformations and sociocultural crises. A comprehensive literature review examines Lacey's key tenets presented in works such as "Values and Scientific Activity 1 and 2" and Oliveira's "From Cognitive Science to Dialectic", as well as articles in scientific databases and communications with the philosopher in 2023. According to him, values and science should be intrinsically linked, provided there is impartiality in scientific assessments. This relationship does not compromise the ongoing pursuit of a robust understanding of the phenomena in the world. The results highlight the relevance of Lacey's perspectives on values in contemporary science, as in contexts such as transgenic research, which raises crucial ethical questions. The applications of such research can have profound impacts, highlighting the importance of ethics.
休-莱西与当代科学的价值观:技术与危机时代
本文介绍了休-莱西关于价值观对当代科学的影响的观点。我们探讨了科学活动与价值观之间的相互作用,培养了对科学实践及其对社会影响的批判意识。我们的目的是填补在理解认知、社会和伦理价值观方面的空白,考虑技术变革和社会文化危机是如何塑造这些价值观的。全面的文献综述研究了莱西在《价值观与科学活动 1 和 2》、奥利维拉的《从认知科学到辩证法》等著作中提出的主要原则,以及科学数据库中的文章和 2023 年与这位哲学家的通信。他认为,只要科学评估不偏不倚,价值观和科学就应该有内在联系。这种关系不会损害对世界现象的深刻理解。研究结果凸显了莱西的价值观观点在当代科学中的现实意义,例如在转基因研究中就提出了至关重要的伦理问题。此类研究的应用可能产生深远影响,凸显了伦理的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信