Holocene utopias and dystopias: Views of the Holocene in the Anthropocene and their impact on defining the Anthropocene

Matthew Conte, Jennifer Bates
{"title":"Holocene utopias and dystopias: Views of the Holocene in the Anthropocene and their impact on defining the Anthropocene","authors":"Matthew Conte, Jennifer Bates","doi":"10.1177/20530196241245650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In delineating the Anthropocene, the Holocene is being redefined as the formative epoch of human development leading to the Anthropocene. This has led to a diversity of views of the Holocene and Holocene humanity in the Anthropocene, the extremes of which may be described as “Holocene utopianism” and “Holocene dystopianism.” The former views the Holocene as a solution to the predicament of the Anthropocene, as an idealized past of human activities and stable climate that must be aspired to. The latter perceives the Holocene and Holocene humanity as the root cause of the ills of the Anthropocene that must be avoided in the future. These views reflect a gross simplification of human activities and the environment of the Holocene. Human activity in the Holocene is characterized by diverse human behaviors that can be perceived as both destructive and sustaining to the earth’s ecological systems, and in many cases, emerged as a response to fluctuations in the Holocene climate. The Holocene does not provide an escape from the Anthropocene, as a solution or as a cautionary tale. Nonetheless, future human endeavors must necessarily draw from the diversity of human activities and systems of organization observed in the Holocene, but do so carefully.","PeriodicalId":510552,"journal":{"name":"The Anthropocene Review","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Anthropocene Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196241245650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In delineating the Anthropocene, the Holocene is being redefined as the formative epoch of human development leading to the Anthropocene. This has led to a diversity of views of the Holocene and Holocene humanity in the Anthropocene, the extremes of which may be described as “Holocene utopianism” and “Holocene dystopianism.” The former views the Holocene as a solution to the predicament of the Anthropocene, as an idealized past of human activities and stable climate that must be aspired to. The latter perceives the Holocene and Holocene humanity as the root cause of the ills of the Anthropocene that must be avoided in the future. These views reflect a gross simplification of human activities and the environment of the Holocene. Human activity in the Holocene is characterized by diverse human behaviors that can be perceived as both destructive and sustaining to the earth’s ecological systems, and in many cases, emerged as a response to fluctuations in the Holocene climate. The Holocene does not provide an escape from the Anthropocene, as a solution or as a cautionary tale. Nonetheless, future human endeavors must necessarily draw from the diversity of human activities and systems of organization observed in the Holocene, but do so carefully.
全新世乌托邦和乌托邦:人类世的全新世观点及其对界定人类世的影响
在划分 "人类世 "的过程中,"全新世 "被重新定义为人类发展的形成纪元,导致了 "人类世 "的出现。这导致了对人类世中的全新世和全新世人类的不同看法,其极端可被描述为 "全新世乌托邦主义 "和 "全新世乌托邦主义"。前者将 "全新世 "视为解决 "人类世 "困境的方案,是人类活动和稳定气候的理想化过去,必须向往。后者认为全新世和全新世人类是人类世弊端的根源,未来必须避免。这些观点反映了对全新世人类活动和环境的严重简化。全新世人类活动的特点是人类行为的多样性,这些行为既可以被视为对地球生态系统的破坏,也可以被视为对地球生态系统的维持,在许多情况下,人类行为的出现是对全新世气候波动的回应。全新世并没有提供逃离人类世的解决方案或警示故事。然而,人类未来的努力必须借鉴在全新世观察到的人类活动和组织系统的多样性,但必须谨慎从事。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信