Prediction of pellet mass thresholds for ELM triggering in low-collisionality, ITER-like discharges

A. Wingen, R. S. Wilcox, B. C. Lyons, L. Baylor, N. Ferraro
{"title":"Prediction of pellet mass thresholds for ELM triggering in low-collisionality, ITER-like discharges","authors":"A. Wingen, R. S. Wilcox, B. C. Lyons, L. Baylor, N. Ferraro","doi":"10.1088/1741-4326/ad3f30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In ITER, pellets are calculated to require more than 8 times the mass than currently planned to reliably trigger ELMs. Unmitigated heat flux impulses from edge-localized modes (ELMs) are intolerable in ITER at full power and current. Therefore, ITER operation relies on multiple approaches to control ELM heat fluxes. One method is pellet ELM pacing to instigate small rapid ELMs with low heat flux. Predicting the performance of pellet pacing is critical for ITER, which is expected to operate in a regime with a low-collisionality, peeling-limited pedestal. However, to trigger ELMs the local pressure increase in the expanding pellet cloud pushes the equilibrium over the ballooning stability limit. In this work, linear and nonlinear M3D-C1 simulations are used to predict pellet mass thresholds in DIII-D discharges and ITER scenarios with peeling-limited pedestals. It is found that the distance of the equilibrium's operational point from the ballooning branch of the pedestal stability boundary strongly changes thresholds. Linear M3D-C1 simulations find a strong dependence of the pellet mass threshold on the poloidal injection location for ITER's 15 MA, Q=10 scenario. The required pellet mass at the planned injection locations is 8 to 17 times larger than currently considered. However, such linear simulations do not include pellet ablation physics or time evolution of density and temperature. A new scheme of 2D nonlinear simulations, coupled with linear stability analysis at various steps throughout the nonlinear time evolution, was developed to include such physics and improve on the linear results. These new nonlinear-to-linear simulations confirm previous findings. This result suggests that pellet ELM triggering in ITER could require pellets much larger than those currently planned, which makes ELM-pacing operationally challenging. On the other hand, fueling pellets injected from the high-field side will likely not unintentionally trigger ELMs in an otherwise ELM-stable plasma.","PeriodicalId":503481,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Fusion","volume":"56 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3f30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In ITER, pellets are calculated to require more than 8 times the mass than currently planned to reliably trigger ELMs. Unmitigated heat flux impulses from edge-localized modes (ELMs) are intolerable in ITER at full power and current. Therefore, ITER operation relies on multiple approaches to control ELM heat fluxes. One method is pellet ELM pacing to instigate small rapid ELMs with low heat flux. Predicting the performance of pellet pacing is critical for ITER, which is expected to operate in a regime with a low-collisionality, peeling-limited pedestal. However, to trigger ELMs the local pressure increase in the expanding pellet cloud pushes the equilibrium over the ballooning stability limit. In this work, linear and nonlinear M3D-C1 simulations are used to predict pellet mass thresholds in DIII-D discharges and ITER scenarios with peeling-limited pedestals. It is found that the distance of the equilibrium's operational point from the ballooning branch of the pedestal stability boundary strongly changes thresholds. Linear M3D-C1 simulations find a strong dependence of the pellet mass threshold on the poloidal injection location for ITER's 15 MA, Q=10 scenario. The required pellet mass at the planned injection locations is 8 to 17 times larger than currently considered. However, such linear simulations do not include pellet ablation physics or time evolution of density and temperature. A new scheme of 2D nonlinear simulations, coupled with linear stability analysis at various steps throughout the nonlinear time evolution, was developed to include such physics and improve on the linear results. These new nonlinear-to-linear simulations confirm previous findings. This result suggests that pellet ELM triggering in ITER could require pellets much larger than those currently planned, which makes ELM-pacing operationally challenging. On the other hand, fueling pellets injected from the high-field side will likely not unintentionally trigger ELMs in an otherwise ELM-stable plasma.
预测在低碰撞性、类似国际热核聚变实验堆的放电中触发 ELM 的弹丸质量阈值
据计算,在热核实验堆中,颗粒需要比目前计划的质量大 8 倍以上,才能可靠地触发 ELM。在热核实验堆中,在全功率和全电流条件下,边缘定位模式(ELM)产生的无限制热通量脉冲是不可容忍的。因此,ITER 运行依靠多种方法来控制 ELM 热通量。其中一种方法是颗粒 ELM 起搏,以激发低热通量的小型快速 ELM。预计热核实验堆将在低碰撞、剥离受限的基底上运行,因此预测颗粒起搏的性能对于热核实验堆来说至关重要。然而,要触发 ELMs,膨胀颗粒云中的局部压力增加会将平衡推到气球稳定性极限之上。在这项工作中,使用线性和非线性 M3D-C1 模拟来预测 DIII-D 放电和具有剥离限制基座的热核实验堆方案中的颗粒质量阈值。结果发现,平衡运行点与基座稳定性边界气球分支的距离会强烈改变阈值。线性 M3D-C1 模拟发现,在 ITER 的 15 MA、Q=10 方案中,球团质量阈值与极性注入位置有很大关系。计划注入位置所需的颗粒质量比目前考虑的大 8 到 17 倍。然而,这种线性模拟不包括颗粒烧蚀物理或密度和温度的时间演变。我们开发了一种新的二维非线性模拟方案,并在整个非线性时间演化过程中的不同阶段进行了线性稳定性分析,以包含这些物理特性并改进线性结果。这些新的非线性到线性模拟证实了之前的发现。这一结果表明,在热核实验堆中触发燃料芯块 ELM 可能需要比目前计划的大得多的燃料芯块,这使得 ELM 步调在操作上具有挑战性。另一方面,从高场侧注入的燃料颗粒很可能不会在 ELM 稳定的等离子体中无意触发 ELM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信