A Comparison of Perioperative Complications and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping Performed Ultra-Early (≤ 24 hours) versus Late (> 24 hours): A 7-Year Retrospective Study of 302 Patients

S. Muangman, M. Raksakietisak, Kamheang Vacharaksa, Kattiya Manomatangkul, Ekawut Chankaew, Chayasorn Kotchasit, Penpuk Deepinta, Sirima Phoowanakulchai
{"title":"A Comparison of Perioperative Complications and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cerebral Aneurysm Clipping Performed Ultra-Early (≤ 24 hours) versus Late (> 24 hours): A 7-Year Retrospective Study of 302 Patients","authors":"S. Muangman, M. Raksakietisak, Kamheang Vacharaksa, Kattiya Manomatangkul, Ekawut Chankaew, Chayasorn Kotchasit, Penpuk Deepinta, Sirima Phoowanakulchai","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Objectives The intracerebral aneurysm with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has a high morbidity and mortality rate. This study aimed to compare the incidences of perioperative complications in ultra-early surgery (within 24 hours) with those in late surgery (> 24 hours).\n Methods Retrospective data were reviewed for 302 patients who underwent craniotomies with aneurysm clipping between January 2014 and December 2020. Perioperative data were obtained from the medical records and reviewed by the investigators. The complications were compared between ultra-early and late operations. We were interested in major complications such as delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IAR), and anesthesia-related complications. The short-term (in hospital) and long-term (1 year) outcomes in patients with or without DIND and IAR were compared. The collected data was statistically analyzed.\n Results Three hundred and two patients were analyzed, and 264 patients had completed follow-up. The ultra-early cases (150 patients) had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, a lower Glasgow Coma Scale, and higher Hunt and Hess scales. The surgeons operated on more cases of the anterior cerebral artery as ultra-early operations. The incidence rates of DIND, IAR, severe hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest were 5.6, 8.3, 6.3, and 0.3%, respectively, which were not different between groups. However, the reintubation rate was higher in the ultra-early surgery cases (0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.023). The DIND and IAR patients had poorer short-term (in hospital) outcomes.\n Conclusions There were no differences in major complications between ultra-early and late craniotomy with aneurysm clipping. However, the reintubation rate was strikingly higher in the ultra-early group. Patients with major complications had early, unfavorable outcomes.","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives The intracerebral aneurysm with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) has a high morbidity and mortality rate. This study aimed to compare the incidences of perioperative complications in ultra-early surgery (within 24 hours) with those in late surgery (> 24 hours). Methods Retrospective data were reviewed for 302 patients who underwent craniotomies with aneurysm clipping between January 2014 and December 2020. Perioperative data were obtained from the medical records and reviewed by the investigators. The complications were compared between ultra-early and late operations. We were interested in major complications such as delayed ischemic neurologic deficit (DIND), intraoperative aneurysm rupture (IAR), and anesthesia-related complications. The short-term (in hospital) and long-term (1 year) outcomes in patients with or without DIND and IAR were compared. The collected data was statistically analyzed. Results Three hundred and two patients were analyzed, and 264 patients had completed follow-up. The ultra-early cases (150 patients) had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, a lower Glasgow Coma Scale, and higher Hunt and Hess scales. The surgeons operated on more cases of the anterior cerebral artery as ultra-early operations. The incidence rates of DIND, IAR, severe hemodynamic instability, and cardiac arrest were 5.6, 8.3, 6.3, and 0.3%, respectively, which were not different between groups. However, the reintubation rate was higher in the ultra-early surgery cases (0 vs. 3.3%, p = 0.023). The DIND and IAR patients had poorer short-term (in hospital) outcomes. Conclusions There were no differences in major complications between ultra-early and late craniotomy with aneurysm clipping. However, the reintubation rate was strikingly higher in the ultra-early group. Patients with major complications had early, unfavorable outcomes.
超早期(≤ 24 小时)与晚期(> 24 小时)脑动脉瘤夹闭术患者围手术期并发症和预后的比较:302例患者的7年回顾性研究
目的 脑内动脉瘤合并蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)的发病率和死亡率都很高。本研究旨在比较超早期手术(24 小时内)和晚期手术(24 小时以上)围手术期并发症的发生率。方法 回顾性分析 2014 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月间 302 名接受开颅动脉瘤夹闭术患者的数据。研究人员从病历中获取围手术期数据并进行审查。我们对超早期手术和晚期手术的并发症进行了比较。我们关注的是主要并发症,如延迟缺血性神经功能缺损(DIND)、术中动脉瘤破裂(IAR)和麻醉相关并发症。比较了有无 DIND 和 IAR 患者的短期(住院)和长期(1 年)预后。对收集的数据进行了统计分析。结果 分析了 320 名患者,其中 264 名患者完成了随访。超早期病例(150 例)的美国麻醉医师协会身体状况较好、格拉斯哥昏迷量表较低、亨特和赫斯量表较高。外科医生对更多的大脑前动脉病例进行了超早期手术。DIND、IAR、严重血流动力学不稳定和心脏骤停的发生率分别为5.6%、8.3%、6.3%和0.3%,组间无差异。然而,超早期手术病例的再插管率更高(0 vs. 3.3%,P = 0.023)。DIND和IAR患者的短期(住院)预后较差。结论 超早期和晚期开颅动脉瘤夹闭术的主要并发症没有差异。但是,超早期组的再插管率明显更高。出现主要并发症的患者早期结局不佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信