Influence of silage preserved by Yenisey microbiovital on the physiological indicators of cells

N. N. Novikova, N. A. Kosareva
{"title":"Influence of silage preserved by Yenisey microbiovital on the physiological indicators of cells","authors":"N. N. Novikova, N. A. Kosareva","doi":"10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-237-245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data are presented on the effect of hay from mixtures of sweet sorghum plants Galiya 85% with Siberian fodder beans 15%, preserved with the probiotic preparation Microbiovit Enisey at a dilution of 1: 100, according to consistent indicators of fattening bulls. Research based on the branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center” RPF (Research and Production Farm) “Omsk” on 6-9-month-old fattening bulls in the amount of 18 heads, divided into three groups of 6 animals: a control and two experimental ones, in the diet of which silage with a preservative, was prepared. And without it. The diet is designed by age and live weight. Feed intake daily. In the comparative period, appetite and feed intake were the same in all groups – 80%. During the transition period, in the 1st and 2nd experimental groups, appetite and palatability remained at the same level, and in the control group, palatability increased by 10%. During the main period in the control group, feed intake remained at the same level - 90%, and in the 1st and 2nd experimental groups, it increased to 100%. As a result of complex studies of feces and biochemistry of blood serum, the following conclusions were made on the leading indicators: indicators of enzymatic (AST, ALT), mineral (Ca, P, Mg), and carbohydrate (glucose) metabolism, substances within normal limits for all groups, alkaline level. Phosphatase was higher than usual, which indicated increased growth of animals. The indicators of protein metabolism, total protein, and creatinine at the end of the main experiment were higher than in the equalization and transition periods; the urea content was at the average normal limits in all main groups. The organoleptic scatological examination and the biochemistry of feces show that the digestive processes of all the animals provided are not impaired. It was noted that bull calves that ate strength preserved by Microbiovit Yenisei had no indigestible fiber due to better digestion.","PeriodicalId":124451,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)","volume":" 45","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of NSAU (Novosibirsk State Agrarian University)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31677/2072-6724-2024-70-1-237-245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data are presented on the effect of hay from mixtures of sweet sorghum plants Galiya 85% with Siberian fodder beans 15%, preserved with the probiotic preparation Microbiovit Enisey at a dilution of 1: 100, according to consistent indicators of fattening bulls. Research based on the branch of the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center” RPF (Research and Production Farm) “Omsk” on 6-9-month-old fattening bulls in the amount of 18 heads, divided into three groups of 6 animals: a control and two experimental ones, in the diet of which silage with a preservative, was prepared. And without it. The diet is designed by age and live weight. Feed intake daily. In the comparative period, appetite and feed intake were the same in all groups – 80%. During the transition period, in the 1st and 2nd experimental groups, appetite and palatability remained at the same level, and in the control group, palatability increased by 10%. During the main period in the control group, feed intake remained at the same level - 90%, and in the 1st and 2nd experimental groups, it increased to 100%. As a result of complex studies of feces and biochemistry of blood serum, the following conclusions were made on the leading indicators: indicators of enzymatic (AST, ALT), mineral (Ca, P, Mg), and carbohydrate (glucose) metabolism, substances within normal limits for all groups, alkaline level. Phosphatase was higher than usual, which indicated increased growth of animals. The indicators of protein metabolism, total protein, and creatinine at the end of the main experiment were higher than in the equalization and transition periods; the urea content was at the average normal limits in all main groups. The organoleptic scatological examination and the biochemistry of feces show that the digestive processes of all the animals provided are not impaired. It was noted that bull calves that ate strength preserved by Microbiovit Yenisei had no indigestible fiber due to better digestion.
叶尼塞微生物菌剂保存的青贮饲料对细胞生理指标的影响
根据育肥公牛的一致指标,用益生菌制剂 "Microbiovit Enisey "以 1:100 的稀释比例保存 85%的甜高粱植物 "Galiya "和 15%的西伯利亚饲料豆的混合物干草的效果。在联邦国家预算机构 "鄂木斯克农业科学中心"(RPF)"鄂木斯克 "分部对 18 头 6-9 个月大的育肥公牛进行了研究,这些公牛分为三组,每组 6 头:一组对照组和两组实验组。实验组则不使用防腐剂。日粮按年龄和活重设计。每天的采食量。在比较期,所有组的食欲和采食量都一样 - 80%。在过渡时期,第一和第二实验组的食欲和适口性保持在同一水平,而对照组的适口性提高了 10%。在主要时期,对照组的采食量保持在相同水平 - 90%,而第一和第二实验组的采食量则增加到 100%。通过对粪便和血清生化的综合研究,对主要指标得出了以下结论:酶(谷草转氨酶、谷丙转氨酶)、矿物质(钙、磷、镁)和碳水化合物(葡萄糖)代谢指标,所有组的物质都在正常范围内,碱性水平。磷酸酶高于正常水平,这表明动物的生长速度加快。主要实验结束时的蛋白质代谢指标、总蛋白和肌酐均高于平衡期和过渡期;所有主要组别的尿素含量均处于平均正常范围。粪便感官检查和粪便生化检查表明,所提供的所有动物的消化过程均未受损。我们注意到,食用叶尼塞微生物制剂的公牛犊由于消化能力较强,所以没有难消化的纤维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信