Dengcai Zhang, Lihua Zhang, Yanjiong Wang, Guangshu Hao, Zhiyuan Li
{"title":"Analysis of the application value of HPV mRNA and DNA detection in early screening of cervical lesions","authors":"Dengcai Zhang, Lihua Zhang, Yanjiong Wang, Guangshu Hao, Zhiyuan Li","doi":"10.2217/fvl-2024-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: At present, COBAS human papillomavirus (HPV) and Aptima HPV screening are widely used to detect HPV infection. In this study, we compared and analyzed the positive rates of DNA and mRNA (n = 10,128 women). Methods: After HPV screening, colposcopy was performed. Subsequently, pathological analysis was conducted on the screening results. Results: In Aptima HPV 16 group, the proportion of pathological lesions ≥CIN2 was 32.69%, while in COBAS HPV group, it was 24.18% (p < 0.05). Aptima HPV other risk types and COBAS HPV other risk types, the proportion of cases ≥CIN2 was 12.42 and 5.79%, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results illustrated that the Aptima HPV test detects more accurately clinically relevant lesions than the COBAS test.","PeriodicalId":503758,"journal":{"name":"Future Virology","volume":" 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/fvl-2024-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: At present, COBAS human papillomavirus (HPV) and Aptima HPV screening are widely used to detect HPV infection. In this study, we compared and analyzed the positive rates of DNA and mRNA (n = 10,128 women). Methods: After HPV screening, colposcopy was performed. Subsequently, pathological analysis was conducted on the screening results. Results: In Aptima HPV 16 group, the proportion of pathological lesions ≥CIN2 was 32.69%, while in COBAS HPV group, it was 24.18% (p < 0.05). Aptima HPV other risk types and COBAS HPV other risk types, the proportion of cases ≥CIN2 was 12.42 and 5.79%, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results illustrated that the Aptima HPV test detects more accurately clinically relevant lesions than the COBAS test.