OVERCOMING TRADEMARK BULLYING IN INDONESIA IS LINKED TO BRAND LAW AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS

Asep Suryadi, S. T. Paramitha, M. G. Ramadhan
{"title":"OVERCOMING TRADEMARK BULLYING IN INDONESIA IS LINKED TO BRAND LAW AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS","authors":"Asep Suryadi, S. T. Paramitha, M. G. Ramadhan","doi":"10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.2327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Accentuation of trademarks makes the business competition even tighter, both from large companies and newly established companies. Having a trademark makes consumers interested in buying the goods or services offered. Trademark bullying is defined as intimidation from large companies to small companies regarding their trademarks, which could result in the bankruptcy of the newly established company. So this research discusses the concept of bullying in Indonesia and how to overcome brand bullying in Indonesia.\n \nMethods: This research is descriptive in nature with a normative juridical type of research, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Data was collected through a literature study, and then analyzed qualitatively.\n \nResults: This research shows, firstly, that the concept of bullying in Indonesia is carried out through intimidation, which starts with summons to small companies and results in the deletion of trademarks and can result in company bankruptcy which causes a lot of loss of income and permanent consumers. Second, efforts to overcome trademark bullying in Indonesia use preventive and repressive legal protection.\n \nConclusions: Preventive protection is carried out by conducting outreach by related institutions to prevent trademark violations and repressive protection in the form of criminal, civil and administrative protection in order to achieve justice, certainty and legal benefits.","PeriodicalId":510463,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","volume":" 433","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v12i4.2327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Accentuation of trademarks makes the business competition even tighter, both from large companies and newly established companies. Having a trademark makes consumers interested in buying the goods or services offered. Trademark bullying is defined as intimidation from large companies to small companies regarding their trademarks, which could result in the bankruptcy of the newly established company. So this research discusses the concept of bullying in Indonesia and how to overcome brand bullying in Indonesia.   Methods: This research is descriptive in nature with a normative juridical type of research, using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Data was collected through a literature study, and then analyzed qualitatively.   Results: This research shows, firstly, that the concept of bullying in Indonesia is carried out through intimidation, which starts with summons to small companies and results in the deletion of trademarks and can result in company bankruptcy which causes a lot of loss of income and permanent consumers. Second, efforts to overcome trademark bullying in Indonesia use preventive and repressive legal protection.   Conclusions: Preventive protection is carried out by conducting outreach by related institutions to prevent trademark violations and repressive protection in the form of criminal, civil and administrative protection in order to achieve justice, certainty and legal benefits.
在印度尼西亚克服商标霸凌与品牌法和地理标志有关
目的:商标的重要性使来自大公司和新成立公司的商业竞争更加激烈。有了商标,消费者才有兴趣购买所提供的商品或服务。商标欺凌是指大公司在商标方面对小公司进行恐吓,这可能会导致新成立的公司破产。因此,本研究将讨论印尼商标欺凌的概念以及如何在印尼克服商标欺凌。研究方法:本研究为描述性研究,属于规范法学研究类型,采用法定方法和概念方法。通过文献研究收集数据,然后进行定性分析。研究结果:本研究表明,首先,印尼的商标欺凌概念是通过恐吓进行的,从传唤小公司开始,导致商标被删除,并可能导致公司破产,造成大量收入和永久性消费者损失。其次,印尼利用预防性和压制性法律保护来克服商标欺凌行为。结论:预防性保护通过相关机构开展外联活动来防止商标侵权行为,而压制性保护则通过刑事、民事和行政保护的形式来实现公正、确定性和法律利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信