Exposing Discrepancies in Indonesia's Legislative Processes

Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-22 DOI:10.21070/ijins.v25i2.1069

Faidhul Mannan, Isvandiar Muhammad Ramzy, Dominikus Rato, Fendi Setyawan

{"title":"Exposing Discrepancies in Indonesia's Legislative Processes","authors":"Faidhul Mannan, Isvandiar Muhammad Ramzy, Dominikus Rato, Fendi Setyawan","doi":"10.21070/ijins.v25i2.1069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study critically examines the application of Indonesia’s Law Number 12 of 2011, which governs legislative processes with principles aimed at ensuring clarity, justice, and accountability. Utilizing a normative research method, the analysis synthesizes relevant literature and legal documents to explore the practical implementation of these principles. The findings reveal significant discrepancies between the theoretical framework and its practical execution, suggesting that while the law establishes a robust basis for legislation, its effectiveness is hindered by gaps in application. This research underscores the need for policy refinement and offers actionable insights for enhancing the functionality and integrity of legal systems globally. \nHighlights: \n \nTheory vs. Practice Gap: Reveals discrepancies between legislative principles and their real-world application. \nLegal Framework Effectiveness: Discusses how implementation gaps impact legal integrity. \nPolicy Improvement Suggestions: Provides recommendations for enhancing legislative processes. \n \nKeywords: Policy Implementation, Legal Integrity, Principles, Concepts, Legislation","PeriodicalId":431998,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21070/ijins.v25i2.1069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study critically examines the application of Indonesia’s Law Number 12 of 2011, which governs legislative processes with principles aimed at ensuring clarity, justice, and accountability. Utilizing a normative research method, the analysis synthesizes relevant literature and legal documents to explore the practical implementation of these principles. The findings reveal significant discrepancies between the theoretical framework and its practical execution, suggesting that while the law establishes a robust basis for legislation, its effectiveness is hindered by gaps in application. This research underscores the need for policy refinement and offers actionable insights for enhancing the functionality and integrity of legal systems globally. Highlights: Theory vs. Practice Gap: Reveals discrepancies between legislative principles and their real-world application. Legal Framework Effectiveness: Discusses how implementation gaps impact legal integrity. Policy Improvement Suggestions: Provides recommendations for enhancing legislative processes. Keywords: Policy Implementation, Legal Integrity, Principles, Concepts, Legislation

查看原文本刊更多论文

揭示印度尼西亚立法程序中的差异

本研究对印度尼西亚 2011 年第 12 号法律的应用进行了批判性研究，该法律以旨在确保清晰、公正和问责的原则管理立法程序。分析采用规范研究方法，综合了相关文献和法律文件，探讨了这些原则的实际执行情况。研究结果表明，理论框架与其实际执行之间存在重大差异，这表明虽然法律为立法奠定了坚实的基础，但其有效性却因应用方面的差距而受到阻碍。这项研究强调了完善政策的必要性，并为增强全球法律体系的功能性和完整性提供了可行的见解。亮点：理论与实践的差距：揭示了立法原则与其现实应用之间的差异。法律框架的有效性：讨论实施差距如何影响法律的完整性。政策改进建议：为加强立法程序提供建议。关键词政策实施、法律完整性、原则、概念、立法

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Indonesian Journal of Innovation Studies

自引率

0.00%

发文量