Effects of responsive breastfeeding intervention on breastfeeding and infant growth in China: A randomised controlled trial

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Shuliang Zhao, Huimin Jiang, Honghong Sun, Qingchun Shao, Xinxia Zu, Yanan Li, Yuanyuan Zhang, Aihua Wang, Xinghui Cui
{"title":"Effects of responsive breastfeeding intervention on breastfeeding and infant growth in China: A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Shuliang Zhao,&nbsp;Huimin Jiang,&nbsp;Honghong Sun,&nbsp;Qingchun Shao,&nbsp;Xinxia Zu,&nbsp;Yanan Li,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Zhang,&nbsp;Aihua Wang,&nbsp;Xinghui Cui","doi":"10.1111/mcn.13654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Responsive feeding serves as an important protective factor for infant growth and overall health development. This study based on self-determination theory (SDT) aimed to assess the effects of a responsive breastfeeding (RBF) intervention programme on maternal breastfeeding and infant growth and development. A total of 110 mother–infant pairs were recruited and randomly divided into an intervention group (<i>n</i> = 55) and a control group (<i>n</i> = 55). The primary outcomes were breastfeeding motivation score, breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE) and exclusive breastfeeding rate; the secondary outcomes were infant physical development at 6 weeks and 3 months. A repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the intervention group had significantly higher Enjoyment scores compared to the control group at three time points: at discharge (MD: 5.28; 95% CI: 3.68 to 6.89; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 5.06; 95% CI: 3.80 to 6.31; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 5.24; 95% CI: 4.12 to 6.35; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Similarly, the intervention group reported significantly higher connection and mother's self-perception scores at discharge (MD: 4.31; 95% CI: 3.07 to 5.56; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 4.69; 95% CI: 3.71 to 5.68; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 4.93; 95% CI: 4.14 to 5.72; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), compared to the control group. In contrast, the pressure from significant others scores were higher in the control group relative to the intervention group at discharge (MD: −2.09; 95% CI: −2.88 to −1.31; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: −4.35; 95% CI: −5.20 to −3.49; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 3 months (MD: −4.89; 95% CI: −5.70 to −4.08; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Finally, the intervention group also reported higher Instrumental Needs scores at all three time points: at discharge (MD: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.58; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 3.58; 95% CI: 3.05 to 4.11; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.69; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). BSE scores were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group at discharge (MD: 14.29; 95% CI: 10.38 to 18.21; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 14.04; 95% CI: 11.05 to 17.02; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 6.80; 95% CI: 4.66 to 8.94; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The rates of exclusive breastfeeding were higher in the intervention group than in the control group at each stage of the intervention (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). At 6 weeks post-partum, the intervention group's infants showed slower weight (<i>t</i> = −0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.371) and length (<i>t</i> = −0.69, <i>p</i> = 0.495) growth compared to the control group, though not significantly. By 3 months post-partum, there was a significant difference in both weight (<i>t</i> = −3.46, <i>p</i> = 0.001) and length (<i>t</i> = −2.95, <i>p</i> = 0.004) between the groups. The findings in this study suggest that the RBF intervention programme based on SDT may be effective in improving mothers' motivation to breastfeed, building breastfeeding self-confidence and increasing the rate of exclusive breastfeeding. The effects of the intervention on infant physical development will need to be verified with longer follow-up in future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":51112,"journal":{"name":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/mcn.13654","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal and Child Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mcn.13654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Responsive feeding serves as an important protective factor for infant growth and overall health development. This study based on self-determination theory (SDT) aimed to assess the effects of a responsive breastfeeding (RBF) intervention programme on maternal breastfeeding and infant growth and development. A total of 110 mother–infant pairs were recruited and randomly divided into an intervention group (n = 55) and a control group (n = 55). The primary outcomes were breastfeeding motivation score, breastfeeding self-efficacy (BSE) and exclusive breastfeeding rate; the secondary outcomes were infant physical development at 6 weeks and 3 months. A repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the intervention group had significantly higher Enjoyment scores compared to the control group at three time points: at discharge (MD: 5.28; 95% CI: 3.68 to 6.89; p < 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 5.06; 95% CI: 3.80 to 6.31; p < 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 5.24; 95% CI: 4.12 to 6.35; p < 0.001). Similarly, the intervention group reported significantly higher connection and mother's self-perception scores at discharge (MD: 4.31; 95% CI: 3.07 to 5.56; p < 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 4.69; 95% CI: 3.71 to 5.68; p < 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 4.93; 95% CI: 4.14 to 5.72; p < 0.001), compared to the control group. In contrast, the pressure from significant others scores were higher in the control group relative to the intervention group at discharge (MD: −2.09; 95% CI: −2.88 to −1.31; p < 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: −4.35; 95% CI: −5.20 to −3.49; p < 0.001) and 3 months (MD: −4.89; 95% CI: −5.70 to −4.08; p < 0.001). Finally, the intervention group also reported higher Instrumental Needs scores at all three time points: at discharge (MD: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.35 to 2.58; p < 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 3.58; 95% CI: 3.05 to 4.11; p < 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.69; p < 0.001). BSE scores were significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group at discharge (MD: 14.29; 95% CI: 10.38 to 18.21; p < 0.001), 6 weeks post-partum (MD: 14.04; 95% CI: 11.05 to 17.02; p < 0.001) and 3 months post-partum (MD: 6.80; 95% CI: 4.66 to 8.94; p < 0.001). The rates of exclusive breastfeeding were higher in the intervention group than in the control group at each stage of the intervention (p < 0.01). At 6 weeks post-partum, the intervention group's infants showed slower weight (t = −0.90, p = 0.371) and length (t = −0.69, p = 0.495) growth compared to the control group, though not significantly. By 3 months post-partum, there was a significant difference in both weight (t = −3.46, p = 0.001) and length (t = −2.95, p = 0.004) between the groups. The findings in this study suggest that the RBF intervention programme based on SDT may be effective in improving mothers' motivation to breastfeed, building breastfeeding self-confidence and increasing the rate of exclusive breastfeeding. The effects of the intervention on infant physical development will need to be verified with longer follow-up in future research.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

响应式母乳喂养干预对中国母乳喂养和婴儿生长的影响:随机对照试验
顺应性喂养是婴儿成长和整体健康发展的重要保护因素。这项基于自我决定理论(SDT)的研究旨在评估顺应性母乳喂养(RBF)干预计划对产妇母乳喂养和婴儿生长发育的影响。研究共招募了 110 对母婴,随机分为干预组(55 人)和对照组(55 人)。主要结果是母乳喂养动机得分、母乳喂养自我效能(BSE)和纯母乳喂养率;次要结果是婴儿在 6 周和 3 个月时的身体发育情况。重复测量方差分析显示,干预组在三个时间点的 "享受 "得分明显高于对照组:出院时(MD:5.28;95% CI:3.68 至 6.89;p < 0.001)、产后 6 周(MD:5.06;95% CI:3.80 至 6.31;p < 0.001)和产后 3 个月(MD:5.24;95% CI:4.12 至 6.35;p < 0.001)。同样,与对照组相比,干预组在出院时(MD:4.31;95% CI:3.07 至 5.56;p < 0.001)、产后 6 周(MD:4.69;95% CI:3.71 至 5.68;p < 0.001)和产后 3 个月(MD:4.93;95% CI:4.14 至 5.72;p < 0.001)的连接和母亲自我感知得分均显著提高。相比之下,对照组在出院时(MD:-2.09;95% CI:-2.88 至 -1.31 ;p < 0.001)、产后 6 周(MD:-4.35;95% CI:-5.20 至 -3.49;p < 0.001)和 3 个月(MD:-4.89;95% CI:-5.70 至 -4.08;p < 0.001)来自重要他人的压力得分均高于干预组。最后,干预组在出院时(MD:1.96;95% CI:1.35 至 2.58;p < 0.001)、产后 6 周(MD:3.58;95% CI:3.05 至 4.11;p < 0.001)和产后 3 个月(MD:1.18;95% CI:0.68 至 1.69;p < 0.001)这三个时间点的工具性需求得分也较高。出院时(MD:14.29;95% CI:10.38 至 18.21;p <0.001)、产后 6 周(MD:14.04;95% CI:11.05 至 17.02;p <0.001)和产后 3 个月(MD:6.80;95% CI:4.66 至 8.94;p <0.001),干预组的 BSE 评分明显高于对照组。在干预的每个阶段,干预组的纯母乳喂养率均高于对照组(p < 0.01)。产后 6 周时,干预组婴儿的体重(t = -0.90,p = 0.371)和身长(t = -0.69,p = 0.495)增长速度低于对照组,但差异不大。产后 3 个月时,两组的体重(t = -3.46,p = 0.001)和身长(t = -2.95,p = 0.004)均有显著差异。本研究的结果表明,基于 SDT 的 RBF 干预方案可有效提高母亲的母乳喂养动机、建立母乳喂养自信心并提高纯母乳喂养率。至于干预对婴儿身体发育的影响,还需要在今后的研究中进行更长时间的跟踪验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maternal and Child Nutrition
Maternal and Child Nutrition 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Maternal & Child Nutrition addresses fundamental aspects of nutrition and its outcomes in women and their children, both in early and later life, and keeps its audience fully informed about new initiatives, the latest research findings and innovative ways of responding to changes in public attitudes and policy. Drawing from global sources, the Journal provides an invaluable source of up to date information for health professionals, academics and service users with interests in maternal and child nutrition. Its scope includes pre-conception, antenatal and postnatal maternal nutrition, women''s nutrition throughout their reproductive years, and fetal, neonatal, infant, child and adolescent nutrition and their effects throughout life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信