Soil Cations Explain the Variation of Soil Extracellular Activities and Microbial Elemental Limitations on Subtropical Grassland, China

Leilei Ding, Hong Chen, Xin Wei, Taoying Qin, Xia Lei, Jingyi Li, Yujun Zhang, Lili Zhao, Puchang Wang
{"title":"Soil Cations Explain the Variation of Soil\nExtracellular Activities and Microbial Elemental\nLimitations on Subtropical Grassland, China","authors":"Leilei Ding, Hong Chen, Xin Wei, Taoying Qin, Xia Lei, Jingyi Li, Yujun Zhang, Lili Zhao, Puchang Wang","doi":"10.15244/pjoes/176566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to compare the effects of grazing and non-grazing on the physicochemical properties, stoichiometry, ecto-enzyme activities, and microbial element limitations of soils at five depths in subtropical grassland, China, and to identify the influencing factors of enzyme activities and element limitations. Results showed that grazing, soil depth, and the interaction between grazing and depth remarkably changed soil available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), available calcium (ACa) and available magnesium contents (AMg), bulk density (BD), water content (WC), and β-glucosidase activity (βGC) ( p = 6.702e-9 - 0.04739). Compared with no grazing, grazing remarkably declined the 0-5 cm soil AP by 73.10% ( p = 0.0250), the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm soil WC by 47.19% ( p = 0.0042), 37.19% ( p = 0.0090), and 30.80% ( p = 0.0034), however, grazing remarkably increased the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30 cm soil ACa by 188.76% ( p = 7.9e-05), 93.24% ( p = 0.0177) ,84.18% ( p = 0.00067), and 38.77% ( p = 0.01368), the 0-5, 5-10 cm soil AMg by 186.69% ( p = 0.0016), 78.89% ( p = 0.0109), the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm soil pH by 0.51 ( p = 0.0013), 0.37 ( p = 0.0006), and 0.27 ( p = 0.0114) units, the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm soil BD by 59.03% ( p = 0.0077), 44.14% ( p = 0.0147), and 35.55% ( p = 0.0071), the 30-50 cm soil WC by 22.88% ( p = 0.0241), the 0-5 cm soil βGC by 89.49% ( p = 0.0011), the 0-5, 5-10 cm soil ACP by 7.87% ( p = 0.0300), 6.57% ( p = 0.0240), respectively. Grazing exacerbated the microbial C limitation of 0-5 and 10-20 cm soils by 20.51% ( p = 0.0078) and 40.38% ( p = 0.0209) and switched the soil microbiome from under N limitation to under P limitation at 5-10 cm ( p = 0.0390). Specific soil available cations were identified as the important factors that significantly explained the variation of soil ecto-enzyme activities and soil microbial carbon and nutrient limitations.","PeriodicalId":510399,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","volume":"12 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/176566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of grazing and non-grazing on the physicochemical properties, stoichiometry, ecto-enzyme activities, and microbial element limitations of soils at five depths in subtropical grassland, China, and to identify the influencing factors of enzyme activities and element limitations. Results showed that grazing, soil depth, and the interaction between grazing and depth remarkably changed soil available phosphorus (AP), available potassium (AK), available calcium (ACa) and available magnesium contents (AMg), bulk density (BD), water content (WC), and β-glucosidase activity (βGC) ( p = 6.702e-9 - 0.04739). Compared with no grazing, grazing remarkably declined the 0-5 cm soil AP by 73.10% ( p = 0.0250), the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm soil WC by 47.19% ( p = 0.0042), 37.19% ( p = 0.0090), and 30.80% ( p = 0.0034), however, grazing remarkably increased the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20, 20-30 cm soil ACa by 188.76% ( p = 7.9e-05), 93.24% ( p = 0.0177) ,84.18% ( p = 0.00067), and 38.77% ( p = 0.01368), the 0-5, 5-10 cm soil AMg by 186.69% ( p = 0.0016), 78.89% ( p = 0.0109), the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm soil pH by 0.51 ( p = 0.0013), 0.37 ( p = 0.0006), and 0.27 ( p = 0.0114) units, the 0-5, 5-10, 10-20 cm soil BD by 59.03% ( p = 0.0077), 44.14% ( p = 0.0147), and 35.55% ( p = 0.0071), the 30-50 cm soil WC by 22.88% ( p = 0.0241), the 0-5 cm soil βGC by 89.49% ( p = 0.0011), the 0-5, 5-10 cm soil ACP by 7.87% ( p = 0.0300), 6.57% ( p = 0.0240), respectively. Grazing exacerbated the microbial C limitation of 0-5 and 10-20 cm soils by 20.51% ( p = 0.0078) and 40.38% ( p = 0.0209) and switched the soil microbiome from under N limitation to under P limitation at 5-10 cm ( p = 0.0390). Specific soil available cations were identified as the important factors that significantly explained the variation of soil ecto-enzyme activities and soil microbial carbon and nutrient limitations.
土壤阳离子解释中国亚热带草原土壤胞外活性和微生物元素限制的变化
本研究旨在比较放牧和非放牧对中国亚热带草原5个深度土壤理化性质、化学计量学、外源酶活性和微生物元素限制的影响,并确定酶活性和元素限制的影响因素。结果表明,放牧、土壤深度以及放牧与土壤深度的交互作用显著改变了土壤可利用磷(AP)、可利用钾(AK)、可利用钙(ACa)和可利用镁(AMg)含量、容重(BD)、含水量(WC)和β-葡萄糖苷酶活性(βGC)(p = 6.702e-9 - 0.04739)。与不放牧相比,放牧显著降低了 0-5 厘米土壤 AP 的 73.10%( p = 0.0250),0-5、5-10、10-20 厘米土壤 WC 的 47.19%( p = 0.0042)、37.19%( p = 0.0090)和 30.80%( p = 0.0034),但放牧显著增加了 0-5、5-10、10-20、20-30 cm 土壤 ACa 188.76%( p = 7.9e-05) 、93.24%( p = 0.0177) 、84.18%( p = 0.00067) 和 38.77%( p = 0.01368),0-5、5-10 cm 土壤 AMg 186.69%( p = 0.0016)、78.89%(p = 0.0109),0-5、5-10、10-20 cm 土壤 pH 值分别降低 0.51(p = 0.0013)、0.37(p = 0.0006)、0.27(p = 0.0114)个单位,0-5、5-10、10-20 cm 土壤 BD 值分别降低 59.03%(p = 0.0077)、44.14%(p = 0.0147) 和 35.55% ( p = 0.0071),30-50 cm 土壤 WC 分别降低 22.88% ( p = 0.0241),0-5 cm 土壤 βGC 降低 89.49% ( p = 0.0011),0-5、5-10 cm 土壤 ACP 分别降低 7.87% ( p = 0.0300)、6.57% ( p = 0.0240)。放牧加剧了 0-5 和 10-20 厘米土壤微生物的 C 限制,分别为 20.51% ( p = 0.0078) 和 40.38% ( p = 0.0209),并使 5-10 厘米土壤微生物群从 N 限制转为 P 限制 ( p = 0.0390)。特定的土壤可利用阳离子被认为是显著解释土壤外切酶活性和土壤微生物碳和养分限制变化的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信