Analysis and Consideration of Legal Issues Related to Stem Cell Therapy

Lan Jiang
{"title":"Analysis and Consideration of Legal Issues Related to Stem Cell Therapy","authors":"Lan Jiang","doi":"10.54254/2753-7048/50/20240948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stem cell therapy has gained momentum in recent years and has positively and innovatively impacted the biomedical field. This paper uses a comprehensive literature analysis and comparative methodology to compare the differences in the development and regulatory systems of stem cell therapies in the UK and China through the available references. The legal framework for stem cell therapies is more complete in the UK, and the government has invested in a regulatory system that promotes research and development. By contrast, China has had problems with surveillance confusion in the past. In recent years, it has worked to standardize the development of therapies and strengthen the regulatory system. While both countries are improving their censorship, some challenges remain. Based on the challenges analyzed, this paper intends to provide suggestions to those involved in stem cell therapies to develop better in the future.","PeriodicalId":506419,"journal":{"name":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","volume":"4 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/50/20240948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stem cell therapy has gained momentum in recent years and has positively and innovatively impacted the biomedical field. This paper uses a comprehensive literature analysis and comparative methodology to compare the differences in the development and regulatory systems of stem cell therapies in the UK and China through the available references. The legal framework for stem cell therapies is more complete in the UK, and the government has invested in a regulatory system that promotes research and development. By contrast, China has had problems with surveillance confusion in the past. In recent years, it has worked to standardize the development of therapies and strengthen the regulatory system. While both countries are improving their censorship, some challenges remain. Based on the challenges analyzed, this paper intends to provide suggestions to those involved in stem cell therapies to develop better in the future.
干细胞疗法相关法律问题的分析与思考
干细胞疗法近年来发展势头迅猛,对生物医学领域产生了积极而创新的影响。本文采用综合文献分析和比较方法,通过现有参考文献,比较中英两国干细胞疗法发展和监管制度的差异。英国的干细胞疗法法律框架较为完善,政府在促进研究与开发的监管体系方面也进行了投资。相比之下,中国过去存在监管混乱的问题。近年来,中国致力于规范疗法开发,加强监管体系。虽然两国都在改进审查制度,但仍存在一些挑战。基于对这些挑战的分析,本文旨在为干细胞疗法相关人员提供建议,以便在未来更好地发展干细胞疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信