Christophe Cauchi, Jonathan Grainger, Bernard Lété
{"title":"On the learning trajectory of directional biases in reading: Evidence from the flankers task","authors":"Christophe Cauchi, Jonathan Grainger, Bernard Lété","doi":"10.1017/s0142716424000134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prior research with adult participants reported a rightward bias in the reading version of the flankers task. Here, we investigated how this bias evolves as a function of reading expertise. We tested two groups of French primary school children from Cycle 2 (grades 1 and 2) and Cycle 3 (grades 4 and 5) and one group of adult participants. In the related flanker conditions, the central target word was flanked by the same word either on the left (park park ####), the right (#### park park), or on both sides (park park park). In the unrelated conditions, the repeated flanker words were replaced by a different unrelated word. In the analysis of standardized reaction times (RTs), there was a three-way interaction between the three groups of participants and the impact of flanker relatedness as a function of the position of the related flankers. This three-way interaction reflected the significantly greater increase in effects of flanker relatedness between Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 for the bilateral flanker and the right flanker conditions compared with the left flanker condition. This suggests that the rightward bias is driven by attentional asymmetries that develop during the process of learning to read.","PeriodicalId":48065,"journal":{"name":"Applied Psycholinguistics","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Psycholinguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716424000134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prior research with adult participants reported a rightward bias in the reading version of the flankers task. Here, we investigated how this bias evolves as a function of reading expertise. We tested two groups of French primary school children from Cycle 2 (grades 1 and 2) and Cycle 3 (grades 4 and 5) and one group of adult participants. In the related flanker conditions, the central target word was flanked by the same word either on the left (park park ####), the right (#### park park), or on both sides (park park park). In the unrelated conditions, the repeated flanker words were replaced by a different unrelated word. In the analysis of standardized reaction times (RTs), there was a three-way interaction between the three groups of participants and the impact of flanker relatedness as a function of the position of the related flankers. This three-way interaction reflected the significantly greater increase in effects of flanker relatedness between Cycle 2 and Cycle 3 for the bilateral flanker and the right flanker conditions compared with the left flanker condition. This suggests that the rightward bias is driven by attentional asymmetries that develop during the process of learning to read.
先前对成人参与者进行的研究表明,在阅读版的侧翼任务中存在右倾偏差。在这里,我们研究了这种偏向是如何随着阅读专长的变化而变化的。我们测试了两组来自第二学段(一、二年级)和第三学段(四、五年级)的法国小学生以及一组成人参与者。在相关侧翼条件下,中心目标单词的左侧(park park ####)、右侧(#### park park)或两侧(park park park)都有相同的单词。在无关联条件下,重复出现的侧翼词由不同的无关联词代替。在对标准化反应时间(RTs)的分析中,三组被试之间存在三方交互作用,侧翼词相关性的影响是相关侧翼词位置的函数。这种三向交互作用反映出,在第二和第三周期之间,双侧侧翼和右侧侧翼条件对侧翼相关性的影响比左侧侧翼条件明显增加。这表明,右侧偏向是由学习阅读过程中形成的注意不对称驱动的。
期刊介绍:
Applied Psycholinguistics publishes original research papers on the psychological processes involved in language. It examines language development , language use and language disorders in adults and children with a particular emphasis on cross-language studies. The journal gathers together the best work from a variety of disciplines including linguistics, psychology, reading, education, language learning, speech and hearing, and neurology. In addition to research reports, theoretical reviews will be considered for publication as will keynote articles and commentaries.