Are some people more accurate than others about the unique impressions they make on close others?

IF 2.6 2区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL

Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104491

N. Elsaadawy , E.N. Carlson , P. Borkenau

{"title":"Are some people more accurate than others about the unique impressions they make on close others?","authors":"N. Elsaadawy , E.N. Carlson , P. Borkenau","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Some meta-perceivers have more insight than others into the impressions they make, but what is this meta-accuracy about? Do good meta-perceivers have insight into the unique impressions they make (dyadic meta-accuracy), or do they simply understand their reputation (generalized meta-accuracy)? In two studies, wemetaces in dyadic and generalized meta-accuracy among close others, as well as potential mechanisms and correlates. Results suggest that, among close others, there are good meta-perceivers of dyadic and generalized meta-accuracy. Good meta-perceivers of dyadic meta-accuracy form more differentiated meta-perceptions, while good meta-perceivers of generalized meta-accuracy make and think they make consistent impressions that align with their self-views. Thus, among close others – unlike in first impressions – there are good meta-perceivers who perspective-take.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 104491"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000394/pdfft?md5=24a3f4a11c8bfe0554c5cffe95e69c2a&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some meta-perceivers have more insight than others into the impressions they make, but what is this meta-accuracy about? Do good meta-perceivers have insight into the unique impressions they make (dyadic meta-accuracy), or do they simply understand their reputation (generalized meta-accuracy)? In two studies, wemetaces in dyadic and generalized meta-accuracy among close others, as well as potential mechanisms and correlates. Results suggest that, among close others, there are good meta-perceivers of dyadic and generalized meta-accuracy. Good meta-perceivers of dyadic meta-accuracy form more differentiated meta-perceptions, while good meta-perceivers of generalized meta-accuracy make and think they make consistent impressions that align with their self-views. Thus, among close others – unlike in first impressions – there are good meta-perceivers who perspective-take.

查看原文本刊更多论文

对于自己给亲密的人留下的独特印象，有些人是否比其他人更准确？

有些元感知者比其他人更能洞察自己给人留下的印象，但这种元准确性是怎么回事呢？优秀的元感知者是能洞察自己给人留下的独特印象（二元准确度），还是仅仅了解自己的声誉（广义准确度）？在两项研究中，我们分析了亲密他人中二元元准确度和广义元准确度的差异，以及潜在的机制和相关因素。研究结果表明，在关系密切的其他人中，有很好的元感知者，他们的元准确性很高。优秀的二元元准确度元感知者会形成更多不同的元感知，而优秀的广义元准确度元感知者则会产生并认为他们会产生与自我观点一致的印象。因此，与第一印象不同的是，在关系密切的人当中，也有善于透视的元感知者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Research in Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

6.10%

发文量

102

审稿时长

67 days

期刊介绍： Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.