Functional Connectivity Alterations in Patients with Post-stroke Epilepsy Based on Source-level EEG and Graph Theory

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dong Ah Lee, Taeik Jang, Jaeho Kang, Seongho Park, Kang Min Park, Min Kang, Park
{"title":"Functional Connectivity Alterations in Patients with Post-stroke Epilepsy Based on Source-level EEG and Graph Theory","authors":"Dong Ah Lee, Taeik Jang, Jaeho Kang, Seongho Park, Kang Min Park, Min Kang, Park","doi":"10.1007/s10548-024-01048-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated the differences in functional connectivity based on the source-level electroencephalography (EEG) analysis between stroke patients with and without post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). Thirty stroke patients with PSE and 35 stroke patients without PSE were enrolled. EEG was conducted during a resting state period. We used a Brainstorm program for source estimation and the connectivity matrix. Data were processed according to EEG frequency bands. We used a BRAPH program to apply a graph theoretical analysis. In the beta band, radius and diameter were increased in patients with PSE than in those without PSE (2.699 vs. 2.579, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.03; 2.261 vs. 2.171, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.03). In the low gamma band, radius was increased in patients with PSE than in those without PSE (2.808 vs. 2.617, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.03). In the high gamma band, the radius, diameter, average eccentricity, and characteristic path length were increased (1.828 vs. 1.559, adjusted <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; 2.653 vs. 2.306, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.01; 2.212 vs. 1.913, adjusted <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; 1.425 vs. 1.286, adjusted <i>p</i> = 0.01), whereas average strength, mean clustering coefficient, and transitivity were decreased in patients with PSE than in those without PSE (49.955 vs. 55.055, adjusted <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; 0.727 vs. 0.810, adjusted <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01; 1.091 vs. 1.215, adjusted <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01). However, in the delta, theta, and alpha bands, none of the functional connectivity measures were different between groups. We demonstrated significant alterations of functional connectivity in patients with PSE, who have decreased segregation and integration in brain network, compared to those without PSE.</p>","PeriodicalId":55329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Topography","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Topography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-024-01048-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the differences in functional connectivity based on the source-level electroencephalography (EEG) analysis between stroke patients with and without post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). Thirty stroke patients with PSE and 35 stroke patients without PSE were enrolled. EEG was conducted during a resting state period. We used a Brainstorm program for source estimation and the connectivity matrix. Data were processed according to EEG frequency bands. We used a BRAPH program to apply a graph theoretical analysis. In the beta band, radius and diameter were increased in patients with PSE than in those without PSE (2.699 vs. 2.579, adjusted p = 0.03; 2.261 vs. 2.171, adjusted p = 0.03). In the low gamma band, radius was increased in patients with PSE than in those without PSE (2.808 vs. 2.617, adjusted p = 0.03). In the high gamma band, the radius, diameter, average eccentricity, and characteristic path length were increased (1.828 vs. 1.559, adjusted p < 0.01; 2.653 vs. 2.306, adjusted p = 0.01; 2.212 vs. 1.913, adjusted p < 0.01; 1.425 vs. 1.286, adjusted p = 0.01), whereas average strength, mean clustering coefficient, and transitivity were decreased in patients with PSE than in those without PSE (49.955 vs. 55.055, adjusted p < 0.01; 0.727 vs. 0.810, adjusted p < 0.01; 1.091 vs. 1.215, adjusted p < 0.01). However, in the delta, theta, and alpha bands, none of the functional connectivity measures were different between groups. We demonstrated significant alterations of functional connectivity in patients with PSE, who have decreased segregation and integration in brain network, compared to those without PSE.

Abstract Image

基于源级脑电图和图论的卒中后癫痫患者的功能连接性改变
我们研究了基于源水平脑电图(EEG)分析的功能连通性在有卒中后癫痫(PSE)和无卒中后癫痫(PSE)的卒中患者之间的差异。我们招募了 30 名有 PSE 的中风患者和 35 名没有 PSE 的中风患者。脑电图在静息状态下进行。我们使用 Brainstorm 程序进行源估计和连接矩阵。数据根据脑电图频带进行处理。我们使用 BRAPH 程序进行图论分析。在贝塔波段,PSE 患者的半径和直径均比非 PSE 患者增大(2.699 vs. 2.579,调整后 p = 0.03;2.261 vs. 2.171,调整后 p = 0.03)。在低伽马波段,PSE 患者的半径比非 PSE 患者的半径要大(2.808 vs. 2.617,调整后 p = 0.03)。在高伽马波段,半径、直径、平均偏心率和特征路径长度都有所增加(1.828 vs. 1.559,调整后 p = 0.01;2.653 vs. 2.306,调整后 p = 0.01;2.212 vs. 1.913,调整后 p = 0.01;1.425 vs. 1.286,调整后 p = 0.01)。01),而 PSE 患者的平均强度、平均聚类系数和转运性则比无 PSE 患者降低(49.955 vs. 55.055,调整后 p < 0.01;0.727 vs. 0.810,调整后 p < 0.01;1.091 vs. 1.215,调整后 p < 0.01)。然而,在 delta、theta 和 alpha 波段,各组之间的功能连接测量结果均无差异。我们发现,与无 PSE 患者相比,PSE 患者大脑网络的分离和整合能力下降,其功能连接发生了重大改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Topography
Brain Topography 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Topography publishes clinical and basic research on cognitive neuroscience and functional neurophysiology using the full range of imaging techniques including EEG, MEG, fMRI, TMS, diffusion imaging, spectroscopy, intracranial recordings, lesion studies, and related methods. Submissions combining multiple techniques are particularly encouraged, as well as reports of new and innovative methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信