A flexible theory for the dynamics of social populations: Within-group density dependence and between-group processes

IF 7.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Brian A. Lerch, Karen C. Abbott
{"title":"A flexible theory for the dynamics of social populations: Within-group density dependence and between-group processes","authors":"Brian A. Lerch,&nbsp;Karen C. Abbott","doi":"10.1002/ecm.1604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Despite the importance of population structures throughout ecology, relatively little theoretical attention has been paid to understanding the implications of social groups for population dynamics. The dynamics of socially structured populations differ substantially from those of unstructured or metapopulation-structured populations, because social groups themselves may split, fuse, and compete. These “between-group processes” remain understudied as drivers of the dynamics of socially structured populations. Here, we explore the role of various between-group processes in the dynamics of socially structured populations. To do so, we analyze a model that includes births, deaths, migration, fissions, fusions, and between-group competition and flexibly allows for density dependence in each process. Both logistic growth and an Allee effect are considered for within-group density dependence. We show that the effect of various between-group processes is mediated by their influence on the stable distribution of group sizes, with the ultimate impact on the population determined by the interaction between within-group density dependence and the process's effect on the group size distribution. Between-group interactions that change the number of groups can lead to both negative and positive density dependence at the global population level (even if birth and death rates depend only on group size and not population size). We conclude with a series of case studies that illustrates different ways that age, sex, and class structure impact the dynamics of social populations. These case studies demonstrate the importance of group-formation mechanisms, the cost of having excess males in a group, and the potential drawbacks of generating too many reproductive individuals. In sum, our results make clear the importance of within-group density dependence, between-group dynamics, and the interactions between them for the population dynamics of social species and provide a flexible framework for modeling social populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11505,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Monographs","volume":"94 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecm.1604","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the importance of population structures throughout ecology, relatively little theoretical attention has been paid to understanding the implications of social groups for population dynamics. The dynamics of socially structured populations differ substantially from those of unstructured or metapopulation-structured populations, because social groups themselves may split, fuse, and compete. These “between-group processes” remain understudied as drivers of the dynamics of socially structured populations. Here, we explore the role of various between-group processes in the dynamics of socially structured populations. To do so, we analyze a model that includes births, deaths, migration, fissions, fusions, and between-group competition and flexibly allows for density dependence in each process. Both logistic growth and an Allee effect are considered for within-group density dependence. We show that the effect of various between-group processes is mediated by their influence on the stable distribution of group sizes, with the ultimate impact on the population determined by the interaction between within-group density dependence and the process's effect on the group size distribution. Between-group interactions that change the number of groups can lead to both negative and positive density dependence at the global population level (even if birth and death rates depend only on group size and not population size). We conclude with a series of case studies that illustrates different ways that age, sex, and class structure impact the dynamics of social populations. These case studies demonstrate the importance of group-formation mechanisms, the cost of having excess males in a group, and the potential drawbacks of generating too many reproductive individuals. In sum, our results make clear the importance of within-group density dependence, between-group dynamics, and the interactions between them for the population dynamics of social species and provide a flexible framework for modeling social populations.

社会人口动态的灵活理论:群内密度依赖和群间过程
尽管种群结构在整个生态学中都很重要,但人们对了解社会群体对种群动态的影响的理论关注却相对较少。社会结构种群的动态与非结构或元种群结构种群的动态有很大不同,因为社会群体本身可能分裂、融合和竞争。这些 "群体间过程 "作为社会结构种群动态的驱动因素仍未得到充分研究。在此,我们将探讨各种群体间过程在社会结构种群动态中的作用。为此,我们分析了一个包括出生、死亡、迁移、裂变、融合和群体间竞争的模型,并灵活地考虑了每个过程的密度依赖性。群内密度依赖性考虑了逻辑增长和阿利效应。我们的研究表明,各种群间过程的影响是以它们对群体大小稳定分布的影响为中介的,而对种群的最终影响则取决于群内密度依赖性与过程对群体大小分布的影响之间的相互作用。改变群体数量的群体间相互作用可导致全球种群水平上的负向和正向密度依赖性(即使出生率和死亡率只取决于群体大小而不取决于种群大小)。最后,我们将通过一系列案例研究来说明年龄、性别和阶级结构对社会种群动态的不同影响。这些案例研究表明了群体形成机制的重要性、群体中雄性个体过多的代价以及产生过多繁殖个体的潜在弊端。总之,我们的研究结果清楚地表明了群内密度依赖性、群间动态以及它们之间的相互作用对社会性物种种群动态的重要性,并为社会性种群建模提供了一个灵活的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Monographs
Ecological Monographs 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The vision for Ecological Monographs is that it should be the place for publishing integrative, synthetic papers that elaborate new directions for the field of ecology. Original Research Papers published in Ecological Monographs will continue to document complex observational, experimental, or theoretical studies that by their very integrated nature defy dissolution into shorter publications focused on a single topic or message. Reviews will be comprehensive and synthetic papers that establish new benchmarks in the field, define directions for future research, contribute to fundamental understanding of ecological principles, and derive principles for ecological management in its broadest sense (including, but not limited to: conservation, mitigation, restoration, and pro-active protection of the environment). Reviews should reflect the full development of a topic and encompass relevant natural history, observational and experimental data, analyses, models, and theory. Reviews published in Ecological Monographs should further blur the boundaries between “basic” and “applied” ecology. Concepts and Synthesis papers will conceptually advance the field of ecology. These papers are expected to go well beyond works being reviewed and include discussion of new directions, new syntheses, and resolutions of old questions. In this world of rapid scientific advancement and never-ending environmental change, there needs to be room for the thoughtful integration of scientific ideas, data, and concepts that feeds the mind and guides the development of the maturing science of ecology. Ecological Monographs provides that room, with an expansive view to a sustainable future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信