Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Cheng-Yu Tang , Shih-Hung Yang , Chung-Pin Li , Yung-Yeh Su , Sz-Chi Chiu , Li-Yuan Bai , Yan-Shen Shan , Li-Tzong Chen , Shih-Chang Chuang , De-Chuan Chan , Chia-Jui Yen , Cheng-Ming Peng , Tai-Jan Chiu , Yen-Yang Chen , Jen-Shi Chen , Nai-Jung Chiang , Wen-Chi Chou
{"title":"Impact of previous S-1 treatment on efficacy of liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer","authors":"Cheng-Yu Tang ,&nbsp;Shih-Hung Yang ,&nbsp;Chung-Pin Li ,&nbsp;Yung-Yeh Su ,&nbsp;Sz-Chi Chiu ,&nbsp;Li-Yuan Bai ,&nbsp;Yan-Shen Shan ,&nbsp;Li-Tzong Chen ,&nbsp;Shih-Chang Chuang ,&nbsp;De-Chuan Chan ,&nbsp;Chia-Jui Yen ,&nbsp;Cheng-Ming Peng ,&nbsp;Tai-Jan Chiu ,&nbsp;Yen-Yang Chen ,&nbsp;Jen-Shi Chen ,&nbsp;Nai-Jung Chiang ,&nbsp;Wen-Chi Chou","doi":"10.1016/j.pan.2024.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/objectives</h3><p>Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (<em>p</em> = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, <em>p</em> = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, <em>p</em> = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, <em>p</em> = 0.02).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19976,"journal":{"name":"Pancreatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1424390324000760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives

Liposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV) provides survival benefits for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) refractory to gemcitabine-based treatment, mainly gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GA), in current practice. Gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) is another commonly administered first-line regimen before nab-paclitaxel reimbursement; however, the efficacy and safety of nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV for mPDAC after failed GS treatment has not been reported and was therefore explored in this study.

Methods

In total, 177 patients with mPDAC received first-line GS or GA treatment, followed by second-line nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV treatment (identified from a multicenter retrospective cohort in Taiwan from 2018 to 2020); 85 and 92 patients were allocated to the GS and GA groups, respectively. Overall survival (OS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and adverse events were compared between the two groups.

Results

The baseline characteristics of the two groups were generally similar; however, a higher median age (67 versus 62 years, p < 0.001) and fewer liver metastases (52% versus 78%, p < 0.001) were observed in the GS versus GA group. The median OS was 15.0 and 15.9 months in the GS and GA groups, respectively (p = 0.58). The TTF (3.1 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.36) and OS (7.6 versus 6.7 months, p = 0.83) after nal-IRI treatment were similar between the two groups. More patients in the GS group developed mucositis during nal-IRI treatment (15% versus 4%, p = 0.02).

Conclusions

The efficacy of second-line nal-IRI +5-FU/LV treatment was unaffected by prior S-1 exposure. GS followed by nal-IRI treatment is an alternative treatment sequence for patients with mPDAC.

曾接受过 S-1 治疗对转移性胰腺癌患者接受脂质体伊立替康+5-氟尿嘧啶和亮菌甲素治疗疗效的影响
脂质体伊立替康+5-氟尿嘧啶和亮菌甲素(纳尔-伊立替康+5-FU/LV)可为对吉西他滨治疗(主要是吉西他滨+萘紫杉醇(GA))难治的转移性胰腺腺癌(mPDAC)带来生存获益。吉西他滨加S-1(GS)是纳布-紫杉醇报销前另一种常用的一线治疗方案;然而,纳尔-IRI+5-FU/LV治疗GS治疗失败后的mPDAC的有效性和安全性尚未见报道,因此本研究对其进行了探讨。共有177名mPDAC患者接受了一线GS或GA治疗,随后接受二线nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV治疗(从2018年至2020年台湾多中心回顾性队列中确定);分别有85名和92名患者被分配到GS组和GA组。比较了两组患者的总生存期(OS)、治疗失败时间(TTF)和不良事件。两组患者的基线特征基本相似,但GS组比GA组患者的中位年龄更高(67岁对62岁,<0.001),肝转移灶更少(52%对78%,<0.001)。GS组和GA组的中位OS分别为15.0个月和15.9个月 ( = 0.58)。两组患者在接受纳尔-IRI治疗后的TTF(3.1个月对2.8个月,=0.36)和OS(7.6个月对6.7个月,=0.83)相似。在纳尔-IRI治疗期间,GS组出现粘膜炎的患者更多(15%对4%,=0.02)。二线 nal-IRI +5-FU/LV 治疗的疗效不受之前 S-1 暴露的影响。对于 mPDAC 患者来说,先用 GS 再用 nal-IRI 治疗是一种可供选择的治疗顺序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pancreatology
Pancreatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
194
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Pancreatology is the official journal of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP), the European Pancreatic Club (EPC) and several national societies and study groups around the world. Dedicated to the understanding and treatment of exocrine as well as endocrine pancreatic disease, this multidisciplinary periodical publishes original basic, translational and clinical pancreatic research from a range of fields including gastroenterology, oncology, surgery, pharmacology, cellular and molecular biology as well as endocrinology, immunology and epidemiology. Readers can expect to gain new insights into pancreatic physiology and into the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapeutic approaches and prognosis of pancreatic diseases. The journal features original articles, case reports, consensus guidelines and topical, cutting edge reviews, thus representing a source of valuable, novel information for clinical and basic researchers alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信