Rowan Williams’ Theology of Revelation

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 N/A RELIGION
Lachlan Vines
{"title":"Rowan Williams’ Theology of Revelation","authors":"Lachlan Vines","doi":"10.1017/s1740355324000159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this essay, I explore two main areas of Rowan Williams’ theology of revelation. The former is his reflections on the silence of God – God’s reticence to clarify himself to us amid our theological and spiritual confusion. I argue that he is not denying that God has genuinely revealed himself to us, but rather Williams is grappling with – and exhorting us to grapple with – the limits of that revelation. The second area I explore is his theory of revelation as generative phenomena, and how his theory underwrites his understanding of church tradition and, mainly, scripture. Williams argues that there is a division within scripture between the parts containing true divine revelation and the parts containing humanity’s broken response to that revelation. I argue that this view, while it is very well formulated and has some merits, cannot surmount the epistemological obstacle of how biased and interested humans can adequately differentiate between these parts within scripture.","PeriodicalId":40751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anglican Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anglican Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740355324000159","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this essay, I explore two main areas of Rowan Williams’ theology of revelation. The former is his reflections on the silence of God – God’s reticence to clarify himself to us amid our theological and spiritual confusion. I argue that he is not denying that God has genuinely revealed himself to us, but rather Williams is grappling with – and exhorting us to grapple with – the limits of that revelation. The second area I explore is his theory of revelation as generative phenomena, and how his theory underwrites his understanding of church tradition and, mainly, scripture. Williams argues that there is a division within scripture between the parts containing true divine revelation and the parts containing humanity’s broken response to that revelation. I argue that this view, while it is very well formulated and has some merits, cannot surmount the epistemological obstacle of how biased and interested humans can adequately differentiate between these parts within scripture.
罗文-威廉斯的启示神学
在这篇文章中,我将探讨罗文-威廉斯启示神学的两个主要方面。前者是他对上帝沉默的反思--上帝在我们的神学和灵性困惑中缄默不语,不向我们阐明他自己。我认为,他并没有否认上帝已经真正地向我们启示了他自己,相反,威廉斯正在努力解决--并劝勉我们努力解决--这种启示的局限性。我探讨的第二个方面是他关于启示是生成现象的理论,以及他的理论是如何支撑他对教会传统,主要是对经文的理解的。威廉斯认为,在圣经中,包含真正神圣启示的部分与包含人类对这一启示的破碎回应的部分是有区别的。我认为,这种观点虽然表述得很好,也有一些可取之处,但无法克服认识论上的障碍,即有偏见和感兴趣的人类如何能充分区分经文中的这两部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信