Technical determinants of air rifle and pistol shooting performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 1.5 4区教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1177/17479541241245356

Vasanth Sundaram, Viswanath Sundar, Kane Middleton

{"title":"Technical determinants of air rifle and pistol shooting performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Vasanth Sundaram, Viswanath Sundar, Kane Middleton","doi":"10.1177/17479541241245356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aimed to investigate the influence of key technical determinants on shooting performance in both air rifle and pistol shooting disciplines. Following a systematic search across four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library), a total of 22 articles were included. The findings indicate that there was a significant correlation between the stability of hold component, as measured by DEV_X ( r = −0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.69 to −0.49; p < 0.001) and HITf ( r = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.79; p < 0.001) and shooting performance in both shooting disciplines. In addition, HITr, another stability component, revealed a significant positive correlation for shooting performance ( r = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.77; p < 0.001) in air pistol shooting. Furthermore, in both disciplines, there was a significant positive correlation between shooting performance and measures of aiming accuracy such as COGhit ( r = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.75; p < 0.001), Targetf ( r = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.84; p < 0.001), and Targetr ( r = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.78; p < 0.001). In both disciplines, there was a strong negative correlation between the cleanliness of triggering and shooting performance ( r = −0.63; 95% CI = −0.75 to −0.48; p < 0.001). Time on target measure significantly correlated with shooting performance ( r = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.68; p < 0.001) across both disciplines. The relationship between postural balance and shooting performance in air rifle shooting was negative, indicating that better postural balance is associated with improved shooting ( r = −0.53; 95% CI = −0.69 to −0.33; p < 0.001). This review emphasizes the significance of various technical components in both air rifle and pistol disciplines.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241245356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the influence of key technical determinants on shooting performance in both air rifle and pistol shooting disciplines. Following a systematic search across four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library), a total of 22 articles were included. The findings indicate that there was a significant correlation between the stability of hold component, as measured by DEV_X ( r = −0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = −0.69 to −0.49; p < 0.001) and HITf ( r = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.79; p < 0.001) and shooting performance in both shooting disciplines. In addition, HITr, another stability component, revealed a significant positive correlation for shooting performance ( r = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.77; p < 0.001) in air pistol shooting. Furthermore, in both disciplines, there was a significant positive correlation between shooting performance and measures of aiming accuracy such as COGhit ( r = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.75; p < 0.001), Targetf ( r = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.84; p < 0.001), and Targetr ( r = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.78; p < 0.001). In both disciplines, there was a strong negative correlation between the cleanliness of triggering and shooting performance ( r = −0.63; 95% CI = −0.75 to −0.48; p < 0.001). Time on target measure significantly correlated with shooting performance ( r = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.68; p < 0.001) across both disciplines. The relationship between postural balance and shooting performance in air rifle shooting was negative, indicating that better postural balance is associated with improved shooting ( r = −0.53; 95% CI = −0.69 to −0.33; p < 0.001). This review emphasizes the significance of various technical components in both air rifle and pistol disciplines.

查看原文本刊更多论文

气步枪和手枪射击成绩的技术决定因素：系统回顾和荟萃分析

该研究旨在调查气步枪和手枪射击项目中关键技术决定因素对射击成绩的影响。在对四个数据库（PubMed、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus 和 Cochrane Library）进行系统检索后，共收录了 22 篇文章。研究结果表明，DEV_X（r = -0.60; 95% 置信区间 (CI) = -0.69 to -0.49; p < 0.001）和 HITf（r = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.56 to 0.79; p < 0.001）所测量的持枪组件稳定性与两个射击项目的射击成绩之间存在显著相关性。此外，在气手枪射击中，另一个稳定性成分 HITr 与射击成绩呈显著正相关（r = 0.60；95% CI = 0.35 至 0.77；p <；0.001）。此外，在这两个项目中，射击成绩与瞄准精度的测量值之间存在显著的正相关，如 COGhit ( r = 0.64; 95% CI = 0.49 to 0.75; p < 0.001)、Targetf ( r = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.63 to 0.84; p < 0.001)和 Targetr ( r = 0.60; 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.78; p < 0.001)。在这两个项目中，触发器的清洁度与射击成绩之间存在很强的负相关（r = -0.63; 95% CI = -0.75 to -0.48; p <0.001）。在两个项目中，瞄准目标的时间与射击成绩明显相关（r = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.31 to 0.68; p <0.001）。在气步枪射击中，姿势平衡与射击成绩之间呈负相关，表明更好的姿势平衡与射击成绩的提高相关（r = -0.53; 95% CI = -0.69 to -0.33; p <0.001）。本综述强调了气步枪和手枪项目中各种技术要素的重要性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Multiple-

CiteScore

3.50

自引率

15.80%

发文量

208

期刊介绍： The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.