A Comparison of Auroral Oval Proxies With the Boundaries of the Auroral Electrojets

IF 3.7 2区 地球科学
Space Weather Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1029/2023sw003689
Simon James Walker, Karl Magnus Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad, Anders Ohma, Spencer Mark Hatch, Gareth Chisham, Margot Decotte
{"title":"A Comparison of Auroral Oval Proxies With the Boundaries of the Auroral Electrojets","authors":"Simon James Walker, Karl Magnus Laundal, Jone Peter Reistad, Anders Ohma, Spencer Mark Hatch, Gareth Chisham, Margot Decotte","doi":"10.1029/2023sw003689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The boundaries of the auroral oval and auroral electrojets are an important source of information for understanding the coupling between the solar wind and the near-earth plasma environment. Of these two types of boundaries the auroral electrojet boundaries have received comparatively little attention, and even less attention has been given to the connection between the two. Here we introduce a technique for estimating the electrojet boundaries, and other properties such as total current and peak current, from 1-D latitudinal profiles of the eastward component of equivalent current sheet density. We apply this technique to a preexisting database of such currents along the 105° magnetic meridian, estimated using ground-based magnetometers, producing a total of 11 years of 1-min resolution electrojet boundaries during the period 2000–2020. Using statistics and conjunction events we compare our electrojet boundary data set with an existing electrojet boundary data set, based on <i>Swarm</i> satellite measurements, and auroral oval proxies based on particle precipitation and field-aligned currents. This allows us to validate our data set and investigate the feasibility of an auroral oval proxy based on electrojet boundaries. Through this investigation we find the proton precipitation auroral oval is a closer match with the electrojet boundaries. However, the bimodal nature of the electrojet boundaries as we approach the noon and midnight discontinuities makes an average electrojet oval poorly defined. With this and the direct comparisons differing from the statistics, defining the proton auroral oval from electrojet boundaries across all local and universal times is challenging.","PeriodicalId":22181,"journal":{"name":"Space Weather","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Weather","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1029/2023sw003689","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The boundaries of the auroral oval and auroral electrojets are an important source of information for understanding the coupling between the solar wind and the near-earth plasma environment. Of these two types of boundaries the auroral electrojet boundaries have received comparatively little attention, and even less attention has been given to the connection between the two. Here we introduce a technique for estimating the electrojet boundaries, and other properties such as total current and peak current, from 1-D latitudinal profiles of the eastward component of equivalent current sheet density. We apply this technique to a preexisting database of such currents along the 105° magnetic meridian, estimated using ground-based magnetometers, producing a total of 11 years of 1-min resolution electrojet boundaries during the period 2000–2020. Using statistics and conjunction events we compare our electrojet boundary data set with an existing electrojet boundary data set, based on Swarm satellite measurements, and auroral oval proxies based on particle precipitation and field-aligned currents. This allows us to validate our data set and investigate the feasibility of an auroral oval proxy based on electrojet boundaries. Through this investigation we find the proton precipitation auroral oval is a closer match with the electrojet boundaries. However, the bimodal nature of the electrojet boundaries as we approach the noon and midnight discontinuities makes an average electrojet oval poorly defined. With this and the direct comparisons differing from the statistics, defining the proton auroral oval from electrojet boundaries across all local and universal times is challenging.
极光椭圆代用指标与极光电子射流边界的比较
极光椭圆和极光电喷流的边界是了解太阳风与近地等离子体环境之间耦合关系的重要信息来源。在这两类边界中,极光电喷边界受到的关注相对较少,而对两者之间联系的关注就更少了。在这里,我们介绍一种从等效电流片密度向东分量的一维纬向剖面估算电喷边界以及总电流和峰值电流等其他特性的技术。我们将这一技术应用于利用地基磁强计估算的沿 105°磁子午线的现有此类电流数据库,得出了 2000-2020 年期间共计 11 年的 1 分钟分辨率电喷边界。利用统计数据和会合事件,我们将我们的电喷流边界数据集与基于 Swarm 卫星测量的现有电喷流边界数据集以及基于粒子降水和场对齐电流的极光椭圆代用数据进行了比较。这使我们能够验证我们的数据集,并研究基于电喷流边界的极光椭圆代用数据的可行性。通过这项研究,我们发现质子析出极光椭圆与电喷流边界更为匹配。然而,当我们接近正午和午夜的不连续性时,电喷边界的双峰性质使得平均电喷椭圆难以确定。由于这种情况以及直接比较与统计数据之间的差异,在所有本地和全球时间内根据电喷边界来定义质子极光椭圆具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
29.70%
发文量
166
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信