Constitutional Referrals by Ordinary Courts: A Platform for Judicial Dialogue and Another Toolkit for Judicial Resistance?

IF 1.6 2区社会学 Q1 LAW

European Constitutional Law Review Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1017/s1574019624000087

Michal Kovalčík

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Constitutional referrals by ordinary courts – Judicial dialogue between constitutional courts and ordinary courts – Toolkit for judicial resistance – Novel taxonomy of features and functions of constitutional referrals – Separation of powers approach – Democratic decay – Self-defence mechanism – Mix of methodological approaches – Case study on Czechia

查看原文本刊更多论文

普通法院移交宪法案件：司法对话的平台和司法抵制的工具包？

普通法院的宪法转介--宪法法院与普通法院之间的司法对话--司法抵制工具包--宪法转介的特征和功能的新分类法--权力分立方法--民主衰败--自卫机制--方法论方法的混合--捷克案例研究

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

European Constitutional Law Review LAW-

CiteScore

2.80

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The European Constitutional Law Review (EuConst), a peer reviewed English language journal, is a platform for advancing the study of European constitutional law, its history and evolution. Its scope is European law and constitutional law, history and theory, comparative law and jurisprudence. Published triannually, it contains articles on doctrine, scholarship and history, plus jurisprudence and book reviews. However, the premier issue includes more than twenty short articles by leading experts, each addressing a single topic in the Draft Constitutional Treaty for Europe. EuConst is addressed at academics, professionals, politicians and others involved or interested in the European constitutional process.